Maybe to you. Like Inori said, there's a clear difference between her actions and Trump’s actions
Did pelosi state the conclusion (her opinion) before the investigation was complete? Yes. Wheres the integrity there? How does that not undermine the integrity of democracy?
2016 "our election was hijacked! Protect the integrity of our democracy!"
2020
*Trump does the same*
"Trump won't accept the outcome! Protect the integrity of our democracy!"
I feel like this is pretty clear cut lol
You're looking at it in hindsight.fair.
One statement resulted in an investigation..
The other resulted in a full blown riot.
But I get your point. Slippery slope if either side is claiming the shit is janky
Election denial is election denialMaybe to you. Like Inori said, there's a clear difference between her actions and Trump’s actions
I thought u were responding to the post I quoted u in. If not then my mistake.Where did I say those tweets were fake? Lol
Election denial is election denial
She claimed the election was hijacked without any evidence, denying the election results."follow the facts" vs "fight like hell"
fuck Pelosi crook ass btw.. im jussayin lol lets not act like these things are the same
She claimed the election was hijacked without any evidence, denying the election results.
Next post gets on trump for not accepting the results. Which she did in her 2017 tweet.
It's very much the same. We're gonna have to agree to disagree here.
How do u know it was hijacked before an investigation?hey this shit was hijacked! Lets investigate to figure out wtf happend
hey this shit was hijacked! Burn this muthafucka down!
same thing in essence but drastic differences. We can agree to disagree
How do u know it was hijacked before an investigation?
So she can deny the results by claiming it was hijacked with no evidence while at the same time talking about protecting the democracy. That's the contradiction.neither of them did.
"Proven to be a thing"Cause there had been talk about the Russian disinformation campaign going on since before the election? Which was proven to be a thing afterwards. People within his team went to jail/prison
Going off the Mueller Report. Idk if you're expecting statistics or what"Proven to be a thing"
To what extent?
Yea stats exactlyGoing off the Mueller Report. Idk if you're expecting statistics or what
That Pelosi = Trump? Idk but I'm still waiting for the day Pelosi incites a crowd to storm a government building cause she didn't believe the results of an electionI think ive lost the plot of this debate. I thought the initial argument was - hey.. election denial from both sides is trash which I agree with.
Once it was pointed out that one sides election denial led to an investigation and the others led to an insurrection.. thats where I felt things separated.
What exactly are we arguing here?