The 2nd Impeachment of Donald J Trump: ACQUITTED
- Thread starter Chicity
- Start date
Scandalust313
Unshakeable Unbreakable Victorious
It sure was!
news.yahoo.com
Raskin: Michigan Statehouse siege was a 'dress rehearsal' for Capitol riot
Rep. Jamie Raskin laid out a case Thursday that former President Donald Trump's "pattern" of inciting violence began long before the Jan. 6 riot at the Capitol. Raskin revisited the political unrest last spring in Michigan and the foiled plot to kidnap and kill the state's Democratic governor.
Get the ethics committee on this dudes
www.cnn.com
Three GOP senators meet with Trump's lawyers on eve of impeachment defense presentation
A trio of Republican senators allied with former President Donald Trump met with his defense team Thursday evening, in the middle of an impeachment trial in which they will vote on whether to convict Trump and potentially bar him from holding public office again.
www.cnn.com
TheNightKing
J.A.P.A.N.
I only wish the Democrats were bold enough to impeach them for violating their oath as a juror in the impeachment.Get the ethics committee on this dudes
Three GOP senators meet with Trump's lawyers on eve of impeachment defense presentation
A trio of Republican senators allied with former President Donald Trump met with his defense team Thursday evening, in the middle of an impeachment trial in which they will vote on whether to convict Trump and potentially bar him from holding public office again.
There is no way you can be impartial and at the same time be strategizing with the person on trial.
TheNightKing
J.A.P.A.N.
One thing we've learned with Trump is that all these rules and norms and oaths are not enforcible in the least.
I would say Democrats need to put laws in place to be able to enforce these things but they probably only looking at it as an opportunity to do it themselves at some point.
I would say Democrats need to put laws in place to be able to enforce these things but they probably only looking at it as an opportunity to do it themselves at some point.
There should be Dems drawing up legislation RIGHT NOW on amending that Constitution so that the impeaching former members question is never raised again
Secondly, NO senator may work with an impeached member once the article(s) has submitted to Senate
Thirdly, update the language of insurrection. We had a sitting president defaming/slandering the country for over 2 months!
@Scandalust313 this is why no one in the room that day will testify. They'd have to lie under oath. I say they complicit
www.mediaite.com
Mark Meadows Falsely Claims Trump Pushed for National Guard Response, 'Condemned' Rioters as Part of 'Immediate' Response to Capitol Insurrection
Former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows falsely claimed that Donald Trump pushed for National Guard response amid the Jan. 6 insurrection, adding that the former president immediately condemned the rioters as they stormed the Capitol.
www.mediaite.com
Scandalust313
Unshakeable Unbreakable Victorious
Woooow!@Scandalust313 this is why no one in the room that day will testify. They'd have to lie under oath. I say they complicit
Mark Meadows Falsely Claims Trump Pushed for National Guard Response, 'Condemned' Rioters as Part of 'Immediate' Response to Capitol Insurrection
Former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows falsely claimed that Donald Trump pushed for National Guard response amid the Jan. 6 insurrection, adding that the former president immediately condemned the rioters as they stormed the Capitol.
They are absolutely complicit!!
That damn Mark Meadows and the rest of the Trumpers, are on some Richard Pryor shit..."Who you gon' believe, me or your lyin eyes?"
This shit is crazy!!
IP360
Doctorate & Ph.D in Bootyology
@Scandalust313 this is why no one in the room that day will testify. They'd have to lie under oath. I say they complicit
Mark Meadows Falsely Claims Trump Pushed for National Guard Response, 'Condemned' Rioters as Part of 'Immediate' Response to Capitol Insurrection
Former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows falsely claimed that Donald Trump pushed for National Guard response amid the Jan. 6 insurrection, adding that the former president immediately condemned the rioters as they stormed the Capitol.
I mean does this jackazzz not realize the whole WORLD watched all this in real time? That the dems dropped COUNTLESS of evidence refuting his claim?
Marc123
You got it dude!
@Scandalust313 this is why no one in the room that day will testify. They'd have to lie under oath. I say they complicit
Mark Meadows Falsely Claims Trump Pushed for National Guard Response, 'Condemned' Rioters as Part of 'Immediate' Response to Capitol Insurrection
Former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows falsely claimed that Donald Trump pushed for National Guard response amid the Jan. 6 insurrection, adding that the former president immediately condemned the rioters as they stormed the Capitol.
These cacs are tryin to re write history in real time
I haven't been keeping up with this other than clips that make the nightly news, but have any of the impeachment managers brought up how their requests for more police and national guard were denied yet? Or have they named any of the ppl that aided the rioters?
Yes and no. Not that the request were denied but that Donald was late in responding to said request
There are no official documents at this time that he denied request or that it was actually Pence that mobilized them. Its all hearsay
And there are no officials on record for having aided them
ElijahPrice
Active Member
The defense arguement is "I know you are but what am I". Wish trump was testifying.