I think there is credence in corruption allegations. The lap top shit DOES sound ridiculous, but what if we are shooting the messenger while ignoring the message. Let's say it is a russian campaign, but the emails are real. Do we ignore it bc it's russia? Or do we still face the truth in it (if any)?@ChicagoFigure
I have noticed you giving some credence to these biden stories. I haven't said anything but i gotta ask. Are you giving any validity to the hunter/email/laptop story? Or are u jus sayin you will "listen" to anything?
You're right it's not illegal. Or we just don't know enough. But where there's smoke theres fire. There is more to his alleged corruption than Burisma though.I'll admit hunter bein on the board at burisma is some swampy foul shit. Yes he was using his name to get a easy check. Like Clay Davis said "i'll take any motherfuckers money if he giving it away." Thats politics. Hunter aint the 1st n surely wont be the last. Its not right, but technically its not "illegal"
I was quick to dismiss the lap top shit myself. The handling of it by Dems, Bidens and media made me think twice. If nothing comes of it fine. But if investigation states the emails are real why would I ignore that? I'm not taking trump's word for it...I'm curious to see what DOJ or FBI says.But if u say ur jus down to "listen". imo thats the same as trump retweeting seal team 6/bin laden conspiracies. There is no respectable line, no established baseline facts.
I won't have a prob admitting if I'm wrongBut come tf on. The story came from rudy Giuliani. Jus that alone should tell you its 100% bullshit. Let alone the timing.