Welcome To aBlackWeb

Racists are in their feelings over Kap’s new Nike ad



https://www.mediaite.com/tv/ex-nfl-...kes-kaepernick-ad-like-9-11-and-pearl-harbor/

Ex-NFL Player Burgess Owens on Fox Business: Nike’s Kaepernick Ad ‘Like 9/11 and Pearl Harbor’

In the mind of Fox Business guest Burgess Owens, Nike’s partnership with Colin Kaepernick is basically tantamount to an attack by a foreign power that leaves thousands of Americans dead or injured.

The former football star has long made his disagreement clear with national anthem-kneeling athletes. And on Monday, he spoke with Fox Business host Stuart Varney to react to yesterday’s events prior to the Miami Dolphins game — where Miami wideouts Kenny Stills and Albert Wilson continued Kaepernick’s protests against social injustice and police brutality. During his appearance, Owens railed against Nike’s “Marxist” representative and what he stunningly deems the “assault” they’re launching on America.

“We have to look at the bigger picture and understand in America that we’re under assault,” Owens said. “It’s like 9/11 and Pearl Harbor, we’re being assaulted by the left. And we need to understand who they are. They’re globalists, and they’re leftist globalists. The worst thing that can happen to our country is to let them get away with it and not understand what their long game is. It’s not American, it’s not about patriotism. It’s profit and politics for them.”

Let’s have a brief history lesson, shall we?

When the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor in 1941, over 2,300 American military personnel were killed, and the event prompted the U.S.’ decision to enter World War II.

When the September 11 attacks happened, thousands of people were killed and injured, billions of dollars worth of property got damaged, and in many ways, the War on Terror that followed after shaped the course of world history at the start of the 21st century.

According to Burgess Owens, Nike’s pact with Kaepernick is comparable to both of those events.

2A703CED-B319-4FBF-9E3D-265EF3DF54B3.gif
 
A customer on the phone tried to engage in a Kap/Nike discussion with me. Talmbout he doesn't know what to make of it.

JLpBPmk.gif
No sir...not today Satan.

You ain't gonna try and bait me into that conversation. By saying "I don't know what to make of it"...tells me all I know where your position stands.

I engage...voice my opinion...next thing you know I get called into my supervisor's office for expressing my support b/c he told on me and trying to get me fired...NO SIR!

Lol
 









BnVB0Zxl25N-png__700.jpg



BnXEjwjgacw-png__700.jpg
 
Last edited:
A customer on the phone tried to engage in a Kap/Nike discussion with me. Talmbout he doesn't know what to make of it.

View attachment 71347
No sir...not today Satan.

You ain't gonna try and bait me into that conversation. By saying "I don't know what to make of it"...tells me all I know where your position stands.

I engage...voice my opinion...next thing you know I get called into my supervisor's office for expressing my support b/c he told on me and trying to get me fired...NO SIR!

Lol

Is this a common thing?

What kind of idiot doesn't know how to form an opinion on an issue. If you have no opinion, that's a good sign you don't know enough about the subject to even be broaching it at all, let alone with strangers
 
https://www.salon.com/2018/09/11/th...merica-is-still-in-slave-patrol-mode_partner/

The ongoing Kaepernick controversy shows much of white America is still in “slave patrol” mode

There’s a long history of whites trashing blacks when they protest the systems whites implemented to keep them down

Thom Hartmann

The slave patrols live.

Just ask any of the people at Nike who answer the phones and are dealing with an avalanche of angry white callers throwing the N-word around and complaining about Nike treating Kaepernick with respect. Trump, Pence, and billionaire Rupert Murdoch’s Fox News are ginning up even more racist hysteria on a near-daily basis.

But this doesn’t come out of thin air. There’s a long history of whites trashing blacks when they protest the systems whites have put in place to keep them down.

Policing people of color, which our history teaches was a “government function” handled by the southern states back in the day, was actually a largely civilian effort, although it depended on the support and constant encouragement of political leaders within government.

So, too, today’s largely civilian, male, and white “slave patrols” are on the lookout for anybody who may support Colin Kaepernick in his protests of police killings of unarmed black people. And those civilians, being called to arms by Trump and Pence with lies that Kaepernick doesn’t “respect” the flag or the national anthem, are flooding into the public square, from Twitter to retail stores.

At the core of modern American policing (particularly in the South), and at the creation of the Second Amendment, we find the slave patrols that were the first militia of the southern states. They’re also essential to the modern neo-confederate and white supremacist efforts to demonize black people whenever they stand up for their rights.

In Georgia, for example, a generation before the American Revolution, the colonial government passed laws in 1755 and 1757 that required all white men 17-47 years old to be members of the Georgia Militia, and for those armed Militia members to make monthly inspections of the quarters of every slave in the state. The law defined which counties had which armed militias, and explicitly required armed militia members to keep a keen eye out for slaves who may be planning uprisings.

As Dr. Carl T. Boguswrote for the University of California Law Review in 1998, “The Georgia statutes required patrols, under the direction of commissioned militia officers, to examine every plantation each month and authorized them to search ‘all Negro Houses for offensive Weapons and Ammunition’ and to apprehend and give twenty lashes to any slave found outside plantation grounds.”

It’s the answer to the question raised by the character played by Leonardo DiCaprio in Quentin Tarantino's "Django Unchained" when he asks, “Why don’t they just rise up and kill the whites?” If the movie were real, it would have been a purely rhetorical question, because every southerner of the era knew the simple answer: well regulated militias kept the slaves in chains.

Sally E. Hadden, in her book "Slave Patrols: Law and Violence in Virginia and the Carolinas "notes that, “Although eligibility for the Militia seemed all-encompassing, not every middle-aged white male Virginian or Carolinian became a slave patroller.” There were exemptions so “men in critical professions” like judges, legislators, and wealthy white students could stay at their work. Generally, though, she documents how most southern men – including physicians and ministers – had to serve on slave patrol in the militia at one time or another in their lives.

And slave rebellions were keeping the slave patrols busy.

By the time the Constitution was ratified, hundreds of substantial slave uprisings had occurred across the South. Blacks outnumbered Whites in large areas, and the state militias were used to both prevent and to put down slave uprisings. As Dr. Bogus points out, slavery can only exist in the context of a police state, and the enforcement of that police state was the explicit job of the gun toting mostly civilian militias.

As I’vewritten before, the Second Amendment was written the way it was — mentioning “state” instead of, as in its original version, “country” — to allow the southern states to keep their militias intact, and those militias were overwhelmingly slave patrols.

As a result, for the two-plus centuries since then, American police — and, in the 19thcentury, American slave patrollers — have largely had carte blanche to execute black men who they think are “out of line.”

In the 21stcentury the publicly-known (and partial) list of the victims of this white and “blue” violence runs long: Akiel Denkins, Gregory Gunn, Samuel DuBose, Brendon Glenn, Freddie Gray, Natasha McKenna, Walter Scott, Christian Taylor, Michael Brown, Ezell Ford, Eric Garner, Akai Gurley, Laquan McDonald, Tamir Rice, Yvette Smith, Jamar Clark, Rekia Boyd, Shereese Francis, Ramarley Graham, Manuel Loggins Jr., Sean Bell, Ronald Madison, and Kendra James (among others).

Not to mention Treyvon Martin, killed by the most notorious recent civilian volunteer “slave patroller,” George Zimmerman.

None of the killers of any of these human beings are in prison for that crime. All of the killers were afforded great deference and privilege — something that wouldn’t have happened if they’d been European cops — because of our uniquely long history of slave patrols.

Our history is also filled with stories and anecdotes about times black people protested this treatment — the story of the response to the brutal murder of Emmit Till is probably best known in the 20thcentury. There was also the murder of Jimmie Lee Jackson, a protest known now as the Selma to Montgomery march.

Protest has now moved from the streets to social media, and then into the venue most visible to white men in American public life: the NFL’s football fields.

Predictably, this inflamed the older white men who run the GOP — particularly President Trump and Vice President Pence – who are regularly shouting out to today’s somewhat less organized but no less enthusiastic “slave patrollers,” encouraging them to “police” the unruly African Americans among us.

At the top of Trump and Pence’s hit list is Colin Kaepernick, who began the protests against these police killings.

But in order to sanitize the naked racism of Trump, Pence, and their lickspittles at Fox News, they had to add a twist to the story: the lie that Kaepernick “hates” and “doesn’t respect” the flag and the national anthem. Fox has even gone so far as to have (white) soldiers’ widows come on and respond to leading questions about Kaepernick “disrespecting” their dead husbands.

But Fox and Trump/Pence have it all wrong, as they well know.

If you’re going to protest police killings of black people during the national anthem, the most respectful way to do it, according to many veterans, is to take a knee. Kaepernick got the idea from special forces veteranNate Boyer, who suggested to him that he should consider going to his knee to respectfully protest the police killings, rather than just sitting on the bench.

“Soldiers take a knee in front of a fallen brother’s grave, you know, to show respect,” Boyer told a reporter he’d told Kaepernick. “When we’re on a patrol, you know, and we go into a security halt, we take a knee, and we pull security. . . . [P]eople take a knee to pray. So for me it was a common ground, at least, to start from.”

Kaepernick loved the idea and adopted it, and now this respectful, almost prayerful protest has spread across the NFL. And Trump and Pence are cynically using it as new and useful shorthand for “uppity black people” that they can use to call out the modern-day slave patrol.

What’s so breathtaking about the entire thing is how often the media in America allows Trump’s and Pence’s slanders of Kaepernick to go unchallenged when its repeated in speeches and rallies. Trump, Pence, and hard-right media have clearly adopted the model, “When one lies, it should be a big lie, and one should stick to it.”

But Americans are figuring it out.

Just as African Americans have been economically disenfranchised since the founding of America, the white billionaire owners of the NFL are continuing that tradition by denying Kaepernick an opportunity to practice his craft. Now Trump and Pence are encouraging the NFL to extend that economic segregation, that redlining, to any other players who may join the protest.

Nike has now stepped up to embrace Kaepernick, in what many Republicans are calling a “crazy” marketing campaign, which has brought this all to the top of the news again. But is it crazy?

Maybe. Or maybe it’s just crazy enough to finally wake white America up to what’s been happening for centuries to our black brothers and sisters.
 
https://www.theadvocate.com/new_orl...cle_83c9b552-b5fb-11e8-9c92-e7c9d75bee5d.html

Slidell teacher no longer a school employee after probe into racially charged post about Nike ad

Valerie Scogin, a ninth-grade math teacher at Slidell High School who drew a torrent of criticism following a racially charged Facebook post, is no longer an employee of the St. Tammany Parish school system.

A spokeswoman for the system would not say Tuesday whether Scogin was fired or resigned, saying that it is a personnel issue.

On Monday, another spokeswoman had said that the teacher had been disciplined but did not elaborate, also saying that it was a personnel matter.


Scogin, a 2003 graduate of Slidell High who has worked at the school her entire teaching career, drew fire when she responded to a Facebook posting by a Slidell High graduate concerning the controversial Nike ad featuring former NFL quarterback Colin Kaepernick, who refused to stand during performances of the national anthem.

It featured a picture of an angry man making an obscene gesture with the words "If you're upset about Nike choosing Kaepernick for the Just Do It Campaign, 'Just Ignore It' like you do police brutality and racial injustice."

Scogin, who posted in a discussion on that post, said, among other things: "Want to not be stereotyped, tell people of that color to quit acting like animals and perpetuating the stereotype." Kaepernick is African-American.

Skylar Broussard, a Loyola University student who graduated from Slidell High in 2017, said she was glad that Scogin is no longer working in the school system.

"I think she got what she deserved," Broussard said. While she said that Scogin was a good teacher who did a lot for her students, she doesn't think that someone who engaged in what she described as "hate speech" should be working with children or members of minority groups.

"I still think she should be gone," Broussard said. "It shows her true colors and true intentions and feelings."

On Monday, schools spokeswoman Meredith Mendez said that Scogin had voluntarily removed the Facebook post and had been disciplined.

But Tuesday, spokeswoman Angela Davitson sent the following statement:

"When this situation was brought to our attention, the school system launched a full investigation, and the teacher involved was allowed due process. This process has been completed, and the teacher in question is no longer an employee of our school system."

It continued: "This incident does not reflect our district’s values, mission and vision, and we remain committed to providing a school culture that is inclusive and meets the needs of all our students, employees and community."

Scogin did not return a call for comment. Her Facebook page has been removed, as have her postings on the former student's page. But the responses others made to her post remain; several of them said she should not be a teacher.

Joshua Dillon, a 2013 graduate of Slidell High who is black, was one of the people posting in the thread when Scogin joined in. He said he understands that people have different points of view, but that he found her comments harsh and objected to her blaming black people for the struggles they face.

Among other things, she posted that people should move if they don't like their ZIP code, ignoring the economic difficulties they face, Dillon said.

"To be a teacher and think that, it's very hurtful ... it's really racist to refer to them as animals," said Dillon, who added that Scogin had never seemed to harbor such views when he encountered her at Slidell High.

Scogin had also posted an apology on her own page, but Dillon said the apology made him even angrier because he felt she didn't take responsibility for the offensiveness of what she had said.

Casey Kelly, a 2008 Slidell High graduate who had commented on the issue on his Facebook page, said Tuesday that he is glad the school system "will not tolerate educators who exhibit racist tendencies," and is proud to be an alumnus of a place that takes those issues seriously.

"I'm hoping the school and the students heal from this and continue in the tradition of diversity, inclusiveness and sensitivity," he said.
 
https://www.theadvocate.com/new_orleans/news/article_4c22cc5c-b505-11e8-a27f-6f6f916d3ce9.html

'These policies are illegal': Hundreds, including area leaders, Saints players, protest Kenner Nike ban

Kenner Mayor Ben Zahn's anti-Nike policy faced growing criticism on Monday, forcing him to defend a ban on Nike apparel purchases by Kenner recreational clubs amid protests in the city that drew local activists and politicians as well as members of the New Orleans Saints.

A memo from Zahn that surfaced online over the weekend appeared to order the head of Kenner's Parks and Recreation Department to ban the purchase of Nike apparel by booster clubs affiliated with the department.

In a statement Monday, Zahn said the new policy was designed to prevent the use of tax dollars to support a corporation's political position, but it instead sparked a broad response from politicians, residents and prominent local voices who saw it as an attempt to inject Kenner into a controversial national political debate through a potentially unenforceable policy.

"It's a shame we're here for this," said Jefferson Parish Councilman Mark Spears, addressing a crowd of several hundred protesters who gathered Monday evening at Kenner's Susan Park Gymnasium. "These policies are illegal."

The rally did not attract any members of the Kenner City Council, though some members of the Saints were in attendance, including Cam Jordan, Terron Armstead and Craig Robertson.

The Kenner policy and the resulting protests come amid the broader controversy surrounding Colin Kaepernick, the former San Francisco 49ers quarterback who sparked a national discussion on race and patriotism for his decision to kneel during the national anthem.

Kaepernick has said his decision to kneel before the start of NFL games was a protest against police killings of African-Americans. His release by the 49ers led to broader protests by NFL players during playing of the national anthem before games last fall.

With the start of this year's NFL season, Kaepernick has been featured in a prominent, and controversial, ad campaign by Nike focusing on his decision to protest.

Zahn's Nike ban, as well as his statement Monday, ignited a firestorm online as well as in the New Orleans area.

New Orleans Mayor LaToya Cantrell said Zahn's policy was "out of step" with the values of her city and "not reflective of the way our city does business." She said that Louis Armstrong International Airport, which is located in Kenner but owned by the City of New Orleans, would not follow the policy.

Gregory Carroll, the Kenner City Council’s lone black member, said he had no knowledge of the memo before it was released and was “100 percent against" the new policy. "I will meet with the mayor and other council members in an effort to rescind this directive,” he said in a statement posted online Sunday.

Other council members also said they had no knowledge of the memo before it was released. Booster clubs were also not informed of the policy and learned of the memo's existence over the weekend, several club members said.

Zahn received support from some corners, however.

“Great message, Mayor Zahn,” Jason Durel wrote on a Kenner-focused Facebook page. “Our tax dollars should not be used to support anyone’s political agenda.”

The anti-Nike policy marks the second time this summer that politicians in Louisiana have attempted to bar certain companies from doing business with the state because of their political positions. Last month, the state Bond Commission voted to reject bids from two of the nation’s largest banks — Bank of America Merrill Lynch and Citigroup — due to a decision by the banks that they would limit their business with firearms companies.

Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry called the two banks’ policies “fascism at its best," though others questioned whether the policy of shunning the two companies would raise costs for Louisiana borrowers.

Zahn insisted that his memo — which also ordered any purchases made by booster clubs to be routed through the city administration — did not ban Nike gear from being worn at the city’s parks.

In his Monday statement, Zahn praised Nike for its “message of inclusion and encouragement for everyone to be their best and dream big.” But in promoting that message, he said, “Nike, in its zeal to sell shoes, chose to promote and sell a political message.”

Many questions related to the policy remained unanswered following Zahn's statements, including whether the ban is enforceable on clubs that often raise money privately in addition to receiving taxpayer funds.

The city’s booster clubs are generally attached to parks or playgrounds, operating concession stands and working to improve the parks or other facilities. Kenner's budget provides several thousand dollars per year for the clubs, but many also raise money via food sales and other fundraisers.

Tulane law school professor Keith Werhan said that Zahn would likely be limited to exercising control over public money. A 1996 U.S. Supreme Court decision would prohibit the city from canceling any existing contracts because of Nike’s political speech, he said. And it remains an open question whether Zahn can prevent any new contracts from being executed, or if he can influence the spending of privately raised money.

“If the boosters are private and he’s trying to extend the prohibition to non-government money, that seems to be more of a problem,” Werhan said.

Questions have also been raised about whether a prohibition on buying Nike products would violate the state's public bid law, which generally requires public bodies to select the lowest priced responsive bidder.

The memo was not the first statement Zahn has made about NFL players kneeling for the national anthem. On Sept. 2, at the City’s Freedom Fest, Zahn introduced the singer of the national anthem by telling the crowd, "In the city of Kenner, we all stand."

A Kenner spokesman did not respond to an email question about whether the city is reviewing its other private vendors for “political campaigns.”

At the protest Monday evening, coach Victor Franklin brought along nine members of his 7- and 8-year-olds football team at Lincoln Manor playground in Kenner.

Franklin said he had to work hard to get the football program going, and Zahn’s comments were making it more difficult.

“I have parents trying to pull their kids out of the program,“ he said. “Parents don’t like what the mayor said.”
 
https://www.kcentv.com/article/news/kenner-mayor-rescinds-ban-on-nike-purchases/500-593498841

Kenner mayor rescinds ban on Nike purchases

Kenner Mayor Ben Zahn made the order on September
5th, the same day that Nike debuted an ad making former NFL quarterback Colin Kaepernick the face of its 30th anniversary 'Just Do It' campaign. Kaepernick came under scrutiny after kneeling during the National Anthem to protest police brutality and social injustice.



KENNER - Mayor Ben Zahn, citing the advice of his city attorney, said Wednesday that he has rescinded his memorandum banning the purchase of Nike equipment by the city's recreation departments and booster clubs one week after it was first sent out to recreation directors.

The move came as somewhat of a surprise after Zahn appeared to double down on the Nike ban when he clarified his policy prior to a large protest Monday night at a city playground.

Zahn made the order on September 5th, the same day that Nike debuted an ad making former NFL quarterback Colin Kaepernick the face of its 30th anniversary 'Just Do It' campaign. Kaepernick came under scrutiny after kneeling during the National Anthem to protest police brutality and social injustice.

"That memorandum divided our city, and placed Kenner in a false and unflattering light on the national stage," said Zahn. "I am passionate about my country and the brave men and women who put their lives on the line every day... My patriotism will not waver."


Zahn had earlier issued a statement saying that the intention of the memorandum was to "protect taxpayer dollars" by not having them used as part of what he called a "political campaign" by Nike.

The 'ban' on purchases came under fire from Kenner Councilman Gregory Carroll, the ACLU and several residents, but also was met with support by other Kenner residents and on social media. The 'ban' made national headlines, something Zahn said he never intended.

fd6.gif
 
https://www.wibw.com/content/news/A...-as-congregation-cheers-laughs-493065141.html

Alabama pastor cuts up Nike gear during sermon, as congregation cheers, laughs

MOBILE, Ala. (AP) — An Alabama reverend has cut up a Nike headband and wristband before his congregation to protest the company partnering with former NFL quarterback Colin Kaepernick.

Al.com reports the Rev. Mack Morris also told his Mobile congregation Sunday that he had bought his last pair of Nikes. Morris says his actions are in protest to the apparel company’s advertising campaign that features Kaepernick, who knelt during the national anthem at football games to protest police brutality.

Morris says no one’s saying how much Kaepernick is earning from Nike “simply because he won’t stand when the national anthem is sung.” Morris received a standing ovation from his parishioners.
This comes as some others denounce Nike’s move, including a Louisiana mayor who last week banned the purchase of Nike products at city booster clubs.

Reverend-Mack-Morris.jpg
 
Back
Top