Inori
NAWF
That was a serious question I asked. Yall laughing at it makes it seem like a trap, lol
It's not a trap. The information dude consumes is clearly 1000% vetted by the finest and most credentialed sources
That was a serious question I asked. Yall laughing at it makes it seem like a trap, lol
Yo, you bring up a good point. People that have a problem with someone giving a review without credentials is a problem.It's not a trap. The information dude consumes is clearly 1000% vetted by the finest and most credentialed sources
Yo, you bring up a good point. People that have a problem with someone giving a review without credentials is a problem.
How come it's not a problem when someone post a source as a random person in their basement over an actual news publication ?
And boom. There it iswe talkin bout actual news with verifiable facts or what food somebody thinks tastes nice and subjectively thinks is good customer service?
And boom. There it is
boom what? You seem to take issue with dude giving his opinion
I said that first paragraph wrong. Im saying that people that have a problem with someone not having the "creditals" to speak about something, why is the energy different when they or someone uses random people in their basement to try and prove a point?we talkin bout actual news with verifiable facts or what food somebody thinks tastes nice and subjectively thinks is good customer service?
This
IT SHOULD NOT MATTER IF IT'S KEITH LEE OR KEITH PLUMBER. TREAT ALL YOUR CUSTOMERS THE SAME
Keith Lee in NYC