Welcome To aBlackWeb

Register

Off Topic (We hit 1 Million Views)

Status
Not open for further replies.
lol@ locking a thread when there's still people actively posting in it.


Isn't that the whole point of a message board?


To generate discussion?


Anyway, since that thread is locked and I can't address it there..........I'm gonna have to address it here.


What is it I need to address?


This post by @AP21:



" I may have said or done some creepy shit, but at least I ain't harass her"
- deadeye

Smh
Click to expand...



Why do I want to address this post?



Because of this post:




You know what.. Fuck this.

I'm gonna preface this by saying that not all the names have been accused of being a sexual harasser but just being an antagonizer, being messy or an instigator which has turned a few females off.

Deadeye
Allergens
Elzo
Chitown B
Max
Beta ( I'm only mentioning him bc of what Goldie said El said)
Click to expand...



What's wrong with this picture?


Why would I have a problem with this post?


Ok, I'll explain.


AP prefaces his post by saying that "not all names on here have been accused of being a sexual harasser."


And that some of them are accused of being antagonizers and instigators.


I can't speak for anyone else on that list.........only for myself.


AP finally acknowledged that NOT ONE WOMAN ON ABW HAS ACCUSED ME OF SEXUALLY HARASSING HER:



Harassing, no

Creepy, yes

But you knew this
Click to expand...


Everybody keeping up so far?


Good.


SO WHY IN THE FUCK AM I THE FIRST PERSON ON THAT LIST..............WHEN I HAVEN'T BEEN ACCUSED OF SEXUALLY HARASSING ANYONE???


And I don't wanna hear any bullshit about "well, the list wasn't in any particular order" either.


I just wanna know why I was the FIRST PERSON WHO CAME TO MIND when........according to you..........THERE ARE PEOPLE ON THAT LIST WHO WOMEN HAVE ACTUALLY ACCUSED OF SEXUAL HARASSMENT???


What's the logic behind that?


Seriously.


You really don't see how fucked up that is???


Or do you really think that someone who's been labelled as an antagonizer/instigator or "creepy" is just as bad as someone who's been accused of sexual harassment?


I can't be the only person who sees something wrong with this.
 
Last edited:
fam, real shit

I'm done having that conversation

the thread reached it's conclusion. I'm sorry your availability didn't allow you to say what you just said but at this point, after 40 pages, suffice to say it's over

everyone seemed to get things off their chest so let's as a collective just move better moving forward

I'm not taking about this anymore
 
deadeye said:
lol@ locking a thread when there's still people actively posting in it.


Isn't that the whole point of a message board?


To generate discussion?


Anyway, since that thread is locked and I can't address it there..........I'm gonna have to address it here.


What is it I need to address?


This post by @AP21:







Why do I want to address this post?



Because of this post:








What's wrong with this picture?


Why would I have a problem with this post?


Ok, I'll explain.


AP prefaces his post by saying that "not all names on here have been accused of being a sexual harasser."


And that some of them are accused of being antagonizers and instigators.


I can't speak for anyone else on that list.........only for myself.


AP finally acknowledged that not one woman on ABW has accused me of sexually harassing her:






Everybody keeping up so far?


Good.


SO WHY IN THE FUCK AM I THE FIRST PERSON ON THAT LIST..............WHEN I HAVEN'T BEEN ACCUSED OF SEXUALLY HARASSING ANYONE???


And I don't wanna hear any bullshit about "well, the list wasn't in any particular order" either.


I just wanna know why I was the FIRST PERSON WHO CAME TO MIND when........according to you..........THERE ARE PEOPLE ON THAT LIST WHO WOMEN HAVE ACTUALLY ACCUSED OF SEXUAL HARASSMENT???


What's the logic behind that?


Seriously.


You really don't see how fucked up that is???


Or do you really think that someone who's been labelled as an antagonizer/instigator or "creepy" is just as bad as someone who's been accused of sexual harassment?


I can't be the only person who sees something wrong with this.
Click to expand...
Im dead af @statement in bold caps
 
deadeye said:
lol@ locking a thread when there's still people actively posting in it.


Isn't that the whole point of a message board?


To generate discussion?


Anyway, since that thread is locked and I can't address it there..........I'm gonna have to address it here.


What is it I need to address?


This post by @AP21:







Why do I want to address this post?



Because of this post:








What's wrong with this picture?


Why would I have a problem with this post?


Ok, I'll explain.


AP prefaces his post by saying that "not all names on here have been accused of being a sexual harasser."


And that some of them are accused of being antagonizers and instigators.


I can't speak for anyone else on that list.........only for myself.


AP finally acknowledged that not one woman on ABW has accused me of sexually harassing her:






Everybody keeping up so far?


Good.


SO WHY IN THE FUCK AM I THE FIRST PERSON ON THAT LIST..............WHEN I HAVEN'T BEEN ACCUSED OF SEXUALLY HARASSING ANYONE???


And I don't wanna hear any bullshit about "well, the list wasn't in any particular order" either.


I just wanna know why I was the FIRST PERSON WHO CAME TO MIND when........according to you..........THERE ARE PEOPLE ON THAT LIST WHO WOMEN HAVE ACTUALLY ACCUSED OF SEXUAL HARASSMENT???


What's the logic behind that?


Seriously.


You really don't see how fucked up that is???


Or do you really think that someone who's been labelled as an antagonizer/instigator or "creepy" is just as bad as someone who's been accused of sexual harassment?


I can't be the only person who sees something wrong with this.
Click to expand...


Because you are the creepiest member and you post them long ass videos by that one dude talking down on black women that nobody watches. I mean ap did creepy shit too he was making Sims characters. But I mean you know this. You say this often “if it’s handsome Paul saying something freaky it’s cool, but if it was 49 year old Jack it would be creepy”

You’re the 49 year old. You can’t be mad people find you creepy unless they were brainwashed
 
Hellczar said:
Because you are the creepiest member and you post them long ass videos by that one dude talking down on black women that nobody watches. I mean ap did creepy shit too he was making Sims characters. But I mean you know this. You say this often “if it’s handsome Paul saying something freaky it’s cool, but if it was 49 year old Jack it would be creepy”

You’re the 49 year old. You can’t be mad people find you creepy unless they were brainwashed
Click to expand...


So..........you didn't read anything I posted then?



Not surprising at all.



D'Angelo from The Wire clip.gif
 
I'll just change the author on a dumb ass posts to you, then paste your words in the thread....



The challenge is to find where in the conversationb the best fit....



I'm ready when you are
 
Thing with Du who probably a good dude you just got to ignore them. Now maybe he was talking to a bunch of bums or stubborn and unyielding. Sometimes you just got to ignore niggas in real life. Dude could’ve been a deadbeat or could’ve been going thru it idk. He was definitely trying to co sign him tho. But many niggas don’t talk nicely
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top