Welcome To aBlackWeb

Register

New job is requiring me to be fully vaccinated

TheNightKing said:
Your post stated sever breakthrough infections are rare. Which suggests the vaccines protect against severe infection.

And you somehow use that to say you’re not getting vaccinated.

See how illogical that is?

But please, regale is with the hella stories you mention and I bet there will be hella more where people got vaccinated, never caught Covid, or caught Covid and was fine.
Click to expand...
You cherry picking points my dude. I said the article reads 50/50 pro con. That particular statement would read as a positive but the tone of the article overall is lost in the sauce, confused af like I said. That same excerpt also says that looks like defense against virus and severe infection fades in months after inoculation and breakthrough hospitalizations may be on rise but that's no biggie right? 😂
 
B_A said:
Surely a guy with a PHD is smart enough to realize the US, alone, doesn't want 250 million people to drop dead in near future.
Click to expand...


With a little bit of research

his Doctrine is in philosophy.

Oxford, as in the city in Ohio (The university of Miami-Ohio) (Not the great University of Oxford)


Dude set up there and EMBELLISHED EVERYTHING to make himself sound better/smart lolololololol
 
Ville'sFinest said:
You cherry picking points my dude. I said the article reads 50/50 pro con. That particular statement would read as a positive but the tone of the article overall is lost in the sauce, confused af like I said. That same excerpt also says that looks like defense against virus and severe infection fades in months after inoculation and breakthrough hospitalizations may be on rise but that's no biggie right? 😂
Click to expand...
Nope, because that’s been publicized and the reason why a booster is being suggested. Still very simple.

Tone is in the eye of the beholder, which brings me back to my original point about seeing what you want to see in the article instead of going by what it’s actually saying.
 
TheNightKing said:
Nope, because that’s been publicized and the reason why a booster is being suggested. Still very simple.

Tone is in the eye of the beholder, which brings me back to my original point about seeing what you want to see in the article instead of going by what it’s actually saying.
Click to expand...
You gotta be playing my dude. Like you cant see how the goal post is consistently moving regarding this shit 1 booster, 2 booster , 3 booster, 4 lmao. The way the vaccine is presented regarding it's efficacy and reliability is trending more and more to the negative.

And it even says directly in the damn article explicitly if read the whole thing that there's many question marks. And there's several questions stated in text directly as well. Huh? 😕
 
Race Jones said:
wait, what is this saying?
Click to expand...
She's saying he same shit the article I posted yesterday mentioned, which we've now built a cross reference for this point in this thread.

Trends internationally specifically in Israel are indicating that breakthrough infection rates in the vaccinated is becoming worse than expected. With rise in potential hospitalizations etc.
 
Ville'sFinest said:
You gotta be playing my dude. Like you cant see how the goal post is consistently moving regarding this shit 1 booster, 2 booster , 3 booster, 4 lmao. The way the vaccine is presented regarding it's efficacy and reliability is trending more and more to the negative.

And it even says directly in the damn article explicitly if read the whole thing that there's many question marks. And there's several questions stated in text directly as well. Huh? 😕
Click to expand...
To those who don’t understand how science works, it might seem like goal posts being moved. When in actuality we’re learning more and more and adjusting accordingly.

Did you expect people to know exactly how everything would unfold with a brand new virus AND a new way of vaccination?

If so, maybe that’s why you’re so hesitant and confused.
 
TheNightKing said:
To those who don’t understand how science works, it might seem like goal posts being moved. When in actuality we’re learning more and more and adjusting accordingly.

Did you expect people to know exactly how everything would unfold with a brand new virus AND a new way of vaccination?

If so, maybe that’s why you’re so hesitant and confused.
Click to expand...
Understand how science works quite well actually and it's common sense that certain things would become more clear with more data. However, as we continue to learn more and more we see how the trustworthiness and efficacy of the vaccine is smaller and smaller. Interesting ain't it.
 
BlackRain said:
The wild shit is so many of the conspiracy theories are so USA specific its amazing the arrogance of people in this country to think an entire global pandemic would be faked just to affect some shit here.
Click to expand...
It’s riots in other cities about damn near the same.
 
I hate that jobs are requiring this.
What if you ya know....... who’s accountable for forcing it?

people can’t even have beliefs anymore
 
DOS_patos said:
I hate that jobs are requiring this.
What if you ya know....... who’s accountable for forcing it?

people can’t even have beliefs anymore
Click to expand...
I agree with you here. I don’t see an issue with the vaccine, but you have to respect people’s decision to not get it.

I know many vaccines are now mandatory and understand why, but it just doesn’t sit right with me. I don’t believe strongly enough though to fight for others’ right to choose either.
 
Ville'sFinest said:
Understand how science works quite well actually and it's common sense that certain things would become more clear with more data. However, as we continue to learn more and more we see how the trustworthiness and efficacy of the vaccine is smaller and smaller. Interesting ain't it.
Click to expand...
That does not equate to dangerous though. And it is effective for a period of time as you agree.

So why not get that protection for the 8 months or so? Might just save a life.
 
TheNightKing said:
That does not equate to dangerous though. And it is effective for a period of time as you agree.

So why not get that protection for the 8 months or so? Might just save a life.
Click to expand...

Theres many that have died or had health drastically reduced that would beg to differ
And the risk for just a short time span of "protection" unless consistently getting the boosters "boosting" the chance of ill effects. NAH 💯
 
Ville'sFinest said:
Theres many that have died or had health drastically reduced that would beg to differ
And the risk for just a short time span of "protection" unless consistently getting the boosters "boosting" the chance of ill effects. NAH 💯
Click to expand...
And literally millions more that have died or had health drastically reduced from Covid. I’d bet those dead would have loved to have had a vaccine. And you know that from stories right now about people being in the hospital regretting not getting it, while vaccinated people are fairing pretty well.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top