He has no credibility. Who’s fault is that?Y'all really trying to use this di exonerate R. Kelly. But nobody is defending him, right?
He has no credibility. Who’s fault is that?Y'all really trying to use this di exonerate R. Kelly. But nobody is defending him, right?
He has no credibility. Who’s fault is that?
How do we know all these so called evidence he has is legit? All these tapes he claimed he has all these people that recently popped up under him?What does his credibility have to do with R. Kelly fucking kids? Is it his word that got R Kelly indicted?
Y'all cats are strange.
How do we know all these so called evidence he has is legit? All these tapes he claimed he has all these people that recently popped up under him?
I thought the evidence was the tape he “ gave” to the policeLet me break this down. R Kelly was not indicted on this man's word about what evidence he still has. R. Kelly was indicted based on evidence that the police already have in their possession. So, again, what does his credibility have to do with R. Kelly's pending criminal charges?
I believe u read it that’s why I’m asking uI believe there is a thread here about the indictment. I believe a link to the indictment was shared there.
I believe u read it that’s why I’m asking u
I’ll save this post for later usageWhy rely on second hand info?
So he didn’t claim he had evidence and women that said they were molested by him? Those very things were used against him and we don’t even know if it was true?Let me break this down. R Kelly was not indicted on this man's word about what evidence he still has. R. Kelly was indicted based on evidence that the police already have in their possession. So, again, what does his credibility have to do with R. Kelly's pending criminal charges?
So he didn’t claim he had evidence and women that said they were molested by him? Those very things were used against him and we don’t even know if it was true?
I’ll save this post for later usage
Were Avenatti’s “evidence” used to indict R Kelly?For the third time, what does any of that have to do with the evidence, that the police have in their possession, that was used to secure the indictment against R. Kelly?
You keep avoiding answering this simple question.
So r. Kelly still a rapist just 10% of the time
if dude has a tape of kelz doing dirt.....thats the case.How does this affect the rkelly case?