Love and thunder is in no way similar to Ragnarok . It feels like a complete different franchise. In Ragnarok Thor was a minor comedic foil but the movie kept the essence of Thor. In love and thunder they turned him into a buffoon and delivered constant jokes that weren funny at all. Also they tried the same jokes from Ragnarok like the stage play. Ithis time it fell flat. In Ragnarok korg was tolerable and he was never funny but at least he didn't talk too much , but he's all over love and thunder and he's the worst thing about that movie. In Ragnarok the humor was balanced and more enjoyable. There were a couple of jokes here and there s d they didn't bombard us with bad jokes by the minute. Ragnarok had a good story with kick ass action
scenes.
Love and thunder is garbage an it shouldn't even be considered canon. I.cant.believd both of them was written by taika waititi. I heard he was trolling all the geeks who criticized Ragnarok when he filmed love and thunder. I really believe this. Nobody can make a .movie this shitty unintentionally. Either that or he doesn't respect the intelligence of the viewing audience and he views us as mindless consumers that will spend money on whatever marvel puts out because they'll show up just because marvels name is on it no matter how bad it is. Also stop saying it was "decent" it wasn't. Stop making excuses for this shit. If you really were a fan you would hold marvel to a.higher standard. If people keeps saying this . Marvel will get comfortable and put out more horse shit like love and thunder. I hate this movie and I've never said that about a movie before in my life.