Welcome To aBlackWeb

Register

Kyle Rittenhouse Trial (Jacob Blake Protest Shooting)

Inori said:



thoughts?
Click to expand...

That is true.. there are tons of people who run unopposed as a result you get what you get.. its not the only factor but its a factor also you can vote your way out of white supremacy and into equality fairness and equity especially voting for people who have invested in the status quo... for decades of their political careers

It is one tool and and can be an important one
 
If this case was “wHiTe On WhItE cRiMe1!1!” then why aren’t there a good amount of MAGA people on the side of the victims? Why are they all on Kyle’s side?
 
5th Letter said:
I thought he was being facetious but I don’t know now. He might be deadass serious.
Click to expand...
Same. Thought he was B1

I did some digging and this brother made a video 2 days ago going at joe for his reasons. It showed a clip of Joe's new show in which he had Larry Elder on a panel. So uhh, yea he's not what we thought

21:00
 
Disanthrope said:
Same. Thought he was B1

I did some digging and this brother made a video 2 days ago going at joe for his reasons. It showed a clip of Joe's new show in which he had Larry Elder on a panel. So uhh, yea he's not what we thought

21:00
Click to expand...

It’s early but it’s not looking good…
 
illed_Out said:
Kyle beating this case means it is totally legal for white supremacists to show up to protests with guns with intent to disrupt and kill protesters…

They set a bold and dangerous precedent with the outcome of this case…
Click to expand...
This was already going on before Kyle was born. Yall act like white supremacist were not already targeting blacks and anti racist protestors. That is the whole reason for the protesting ....white supremacy.

Nothing changes if he was found guilty. People keep ignoring that point for some reason. Let me guess, Kyle was they key to ending white supremacy?

Yall keep missing the forrest cause you keep staring at the tree. People like that judge is the problem. Just like the laws and the system which allowed all of this to happen.

This is why progress never happens fast enough. You had that scum who killed George found guilty but does that stop cops from hurting unarmed blacks? No. There is no precedence to bet set when the system is still the same regardless.

Its just like when slavery ended. The issue of racism continued. As ling as the system is the same there will always be someone getting off even if Kyle did not. Look at all the cops who get away.
 
VulcanRaven said:
This was already going on before Kyle was born. Yall act like white supremacist were not already targeting blacks and anti racist protestors. That is the whole reason for the protesting ....white supremacy.

Nothing changes if he was found guilty. People keep ignoring that point for some reason. Let me guess, Kyle was they key to ending white supremacy?

Yall keep missing the forrest cause you keep staring at the tree. People like that judge is the problem. Just like the laws and the system which allowed all of this to happen.

This is why progress never happens fast enough. You had that scum who killed George found guilty but does that stop cops from hurting unarmed blacks? No. There is no precedence to bet set when the system is still the same regardless.

Its just like when slavery ended. The issue of racism continued. As ling as the system is the same there will always be someone getting off even if Kyle did not. Look at all the cops who get away.
Click to expand...
Kyle was not a cop

He was a vigilante

A conviction could've helped deter future vigilantes, at least make them think twice

The acquittal certainly doesn't do that

You understand that.
 
illed_Out said:
Kyle beating this case means it is totally legal for white supremacists to show up to protests with guns with intent to disrupt and kill protesters…

They set a bold and dangerous precedent with the outcome of this case…
Click to expand...

This is an over emotional logic leap.

They were already showing up with guns to these protests and it was already legal.

They were already “intending” to shoot people given the proper excuse. Ain’t a damn thing change with this case.

All this case does is bolster the “fuck around and find out” rhetoric. They can’t just show up to a protest and start mowing niggas down for no reason. THATS STILL ILLEGAL. It’ll take one of these morons thinking he’s Charles Bronson to run up on them and instigate a confrontation to make it legal.

Which is what they’ve always wanted from you. So be smart. You run up on somebody armed with a rifle and attack them and you ain’t at least similarly armed… and he shoot your dumbass… you had it coming to you.

Ignore them larping Gravy SEAL wanna be tier 3 operators and let them do all that posturing. They’re there for the “action”. Don’t give them none unless you gon REALLY give them some.

Our problem is we keep half steppin. Do a little and then when they overreact we start begging for white supremacy to take down white supremacy. Either go all In Or don’t
 
SneakDZA said:
It's pretty obvious who here has never been to a protest but somehow has mad shit to say online.

These "this is white on white crime" folks are some cornballs for real.
Click to expand...
Uh huh? I've been going to protests since the 90s, but keep talking out ya ass.

People in here are really desperate for everyone to give a fuck about 3 caucs shot by another cauc. Why? Because the media told them to. Admit that shit, if this case wasn't on tv nobody would be bringing it up. Save all the "this sets a precedent" bullshit, it doesn't. It's like some of you MFers think struggles began the last 10 years. I'm sure civil rights protestors would be amused to find out that resistant wasn't allowed at protests before this case.

And like clockwork you whine about three white degenerates, and attack anyone in here who disagrees. Because we at a point the past few years where disagreement isn't allowed. if you disagree with what white people want us to think then something must be wrong with you apparently. Just like when some of us pointed out that Biden was garbage and that we shouldn't supported him during the primaries, and got called names. "Oh but he'll come through for us!", how'd that work out. You new niggas are funny as hell. Keep kissing white people's ass and hoping they give a shit about us, I'm sure if we cried over these deaths enough it will finally happen. It's god damn Saturday, stop whining about this shit and enjoy your weekend.
 
Regardless how u feel about Rittenhouse and what his true intentions were, the prosecution simply didn't have a strong enough case and the evidence/witnesses (even the ones the state called) hurt them more than helped.

www.npr.org

Why the Kyle Rittenhouse 'not guilty' verdict is not a surprise to legal experts

Prosecutors had argued that Rittenhouse was responsible for the deadly peril that night. But legal experts said his claim of self-defense was strong from the beginning.
www.npr.org www.npr.org
 
ThaManMythLegnd said:
Uh huh? I've been going to protests since the 90s, but keep talking out ya ass.

People in here are really desperate for everyone to give a fuck about 3 caucs shot by another cauc. Why? Because the media told them to. Admit that shit, if this case wasn't on tv nobody would be bringing it up. Save all the "this sets a precedent" bullshit, it doesn't. It's like some of you MFers think struggles began the last 10 years. I'm sure civil rights protestors would be amused to find out that resistant wasn't allowed at protests before this case.

And like clockwork you whine about three white degenerates, and attack anyone in here who disagrees. Because we at a point the past few years where disagreement isn't allowed. if you disagree with what white people want us to think then something must be wrong with you apparently. Just like when some of us pointed out that Biden was garbage and that we shouldn't supported him during the primaries, and got called names. "Oh but he'll come through for us!", how'd that work out. You new niggas are funny as hell. Keep kissing white people's ass and hoping they give a shit about us, I'm sure if we cried over these deaths enough it will finally happen. It's god damn Saturday, stop whining about this shit and enjoy your weekend.
Click to expand...

You're all over the place, man.

During a Gish gallop, a debater confronts an opponent with a rapid series of many specious arguments, half-truths, and misrepresentations in a short space of time, which makes it impossible for the opponent to refute all of them within the format of a formal debate. In practice, each point raised by the "Gish galloper" takes considerably more time to refute or fact-check than it did to state in the first place.
Click to expand...
 
ThaManMythLegnd said:
People in here are really desperate for everyone to give a fuck about 3 caucs shot by another cauc. Why? Because the media told them to. Admit that shit, if this case wasn't on tv nobody would be bringing it up. Save all the "this sets a precedent" bullshit, it doesn't. It's like some of you MFers think struggles began the last 10 years. I'm sure civil rights protestors would be amused to find out that resistant wasn't allowed at protests before this case.
Click to expand...
  • After one user on Patriots.win wrote, “Antifags and BLMKKK gotta be shitting. We have permission to defend ourselves now,” [sic] another responded, “We don’t need fucking permission and never did. But now, it’s a legal precedent.”
  • One boogalooer on Twitter wrote: “WE CAN PROTECT OUR COMMUNITIES NOW REFERENCING RITTENHOUSE V. Wisconsin.”
  • On Telegram, QAnon John wrote, “This case is a MAJOR turning point in the quest for JUSTICE in our country. Especially in terms of the 2nd Amendment, and self-defense cases moving forward…The precedent set in this trial will be one that is revisited, and referenced for the unseeable future.”
  • Also on Telegram, Aaron Chapman, the leader of the neo-Nazi group the Occidental Templars, praised the verdict as giving “good Americans legal precedent and license to kill violent commies without worrying about doing life in prison if we defend ourselves in a riot. This will also show militia types that they don’t have to avoid the riots to protect themselves legally.”
  • One user in the Proud Boys public chatroom on Telegram shared an image of the snake from the Gadsden flag biting the fist from the antifa logo with the caption “YOU WERE WARNED.” Beneath it, the user wrote, “#Kyle #FAFO” (“FAFO” stands for “Fuck around and find out.”)

    You are being redirected...

    www.adl.org
 
5th Letter said:
  • After one user on Patriots.win wrote, “Antifags and BLMKKK gotta be shitting. We have permission to defend ourselves now,” [sic] another responded, “We don’t need fucking permission and never did. But now, it’s a legal precedent.”
  • One boogalooer on Twitter wrote: “WE CAN PROTECT OUR COMMUNITIES NOW REFERENCING RITTENHOUSE V. Wisconsin.”
  • On Telegram, QAnon John wrote, “This case is a MAJOR turning point in the quest for JUSTICE in our country. Especially in terms of the 2nd Amendment, and self-defense cases moving forward…The precedent set in this trial will be one that is revisited, and referenced for the unseeable future.”
  • Also on Telegram, Aaron Chapman, the leader of the neo-Nazi group the Occidental Templars, praised the verdict as giving “good Americans legal precedent and license to kill violent commies without worrying about doing life in prison if we defend ourselves in a riot. This will also show militia types that they don’t have to avoid the riots to protect themselves legally.”
  • One user in the Proud Boys public chatroom on Telegram shared an image of the snake from the Gadsden flag biting the fist from the antifa logo with the caption “YOU WERE WARNED.” Beneath it, the user wrote, “#Kyle #FAFO” (“FAFO” stands for “Fuck around and find out.”)

    You are being redirected...

    www.adl.org
Click to expand...
But what does any of that have to do with black people /s
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top