Let's just end the discussion here: Being "Pro-black" has nothing to do with nothing, having facts about history and the precise timing with the details is what I am concerning myself with.
You made a statement earlier in this thread that I read, which stated that you don't think the wealth gap between whites and blacks is not as wide as people make it out to be, that type of mind-thinking and rhetoric being projected is not true and it casts a perception to those reading your statements to think that black people are not struggling and not at the bottom of the barrel. The wealth gap between the average black man and woman is not even close compared to an Asian, white woman, or man, etc. I gave you raw numbers to debunk your statement. When you make a statement like that, please explain to us what it is meant or have raw data/sources to be looked at.
Now you are talking about the slave trade and posting on what you may think, instead of actual facts that's listed. You made a statement about the Arabs and their control in Africa, Busta had to inject that they owned slaves in Africa, which is a slave trade and the market. I stated to you that Europe was a broke continent and the moors came with all types of things to enhance their society, You stated that Africa was unable to fight back because of the Trans-Atlantic slave trade which makes no sense, when a slave trade was already happening in the continent, been going on
You said that Europe made money with iron, and I asked you what was being built with iron before slavery? Where did they even get iron from? Who was buying up all this iron to make Europe this wealthy country before slavery? Now you stated that they were in the dark ages, after I stated that they were a broke infested, illiterate nasty ass group of people, being in the dark ages, Dark ages, is a white soft term that they use, instead of telling it like it is, which is Europeans were dumb, broke, poverty, sick, diseased infested etc people
You are all over the place and now you post a picture of a castle, not understanding that the kings and queens use to live in barns (as I posted) before they were living in castles, where do you think they got the idea to live in Castles come from? Who do you think built/designed the buildings and structures over there in Europe? Where do you think all of that came from?? If Europe was not a broke continent, why were many of their kings and queens living in barns sleeping with animals, Why was feces all over the streets, no sewer system in place whatsoever, why there were many famines, why was there no street lights or running water, why was the literacy rate so low, why were there hardly any universities in Europe before the Moors got there. Again, if Europe had money, all of these things wouldn't be happening, why was there even a dark age period if Europe wasn't broke?? Again let's look at logic and be precise about history instead of playing this guessing game
Most if not 90-95% of those structures come from the structural contents of Africa
Washington DC whole structure is of Africa content/design, The Lincoln Memorial, who is he sitting like that has a statue in Africa which was built thousands of years before DC was even thought of?
The Washington Monument looks like a what that's in Africa? That whole city structural content is a replica of Africa structural content and you're trying to project that Europe was this thriving continent before slavery, that is completely false. Europe was a broke, cold, dirty continent.
The end 1492, Europe is freed. Boabdil, the Black Muslim General and ruler of Granada city, is defeated … Read the article
en.lisapoyakama.org