That video is wild... The victim and his family are blessed, having a gun jam three times is crazy...
Doesn't appear apples to apples. The Rittenhouse defense was he wasn't committing a criminal act by shooting those people. Not "he's just a kid and deserves a second chance."
25 gets him out of jail at 40. How's that life?
Y'all weird up here, but I'll go into it more later.
He should’ve gotten 5 years. There’s no stand your ground law in Wisconsin btw….
What is an example of standing your ground?You don't know what "stand your ground" is, or you don't know what happened in the Rittenhouse case.
You'll probably reply with a subject change. But focus instead.
Bunch of random wackos from other places, took it upon themselves to travel to where BLM protests were and "patrol" while open carrying AR's. Cops saw them and didnt even send them home to their own neighborhoods, in stead thanked them.
Then after they found the trouble they were looking for, and the shooting took place, didnt cops responding to the scene just let Kyle run by them holding his AR? While everyone was pointing toward him. In stead they were focused on the BLM people still.
He should of been charged with something.
Perfect example of conditioning.
Going to prison at 14 and possibly getting out at 40 is pretty much life. Tell me how its not.
I already have an idea on what angle you will try and take but, i want to hear it from you.
Theres a reason why 25 years is life in a bunch of European countries, but they're way ahead of us in thinking and it seems we just keep regressing as more time goes on.
What is an example of standing your ground?
For example, if an unarmed child is attacking a man, the man cannot use deadly force in self defense regardless of the jurisdiction's stand your ground law. Similarly, if the threat is not imminent, force is not justified.
So what am I missing here?
Are you trolling me? Or gaslighting?That's not about stand your ground. It literally says that example is what he's not allowed to do "regardless of the jurisdiction's stand your ground law." You have reading comprehension issues.
That's about when lethal force can be used regarding being in imminent danger. Stand your ground is about your responsibly in these situations. In stand your ground states you don't have an obligation to try to retreat or get away.
That doesn't matter with Rittenhouse because he did try to run away from every person he shot.
The state doesn’t have stand your ground.That's not about stand your ground. It literally says that example is what he's not allowed to do "regardless of the jurisdiction's stand your ground law." You have reading comprehension issues.
That's about when lethal force can be used regarding being in imminent danger. Stand your ground is about your responsibly in these situations. In stand your ground states you don't have an obligation to try to retreat or get away.
That doesn't matter with Rittenhouse because he did try to run away from every person he shot.
Went exactly how I expected. I'd go into detail on why you are wrong, but if your at this age and still dont understand what I was getting at, its pointless. I'm sure other understood what I was getting at.He was charged with something. Why do you think there was a trial?
Life is life. Being able to live another 30+ years a free man vs being in jail is different. That's not an angle, that's what it is.
And fuck Europe. People act like it's some shining example of proper behavior. Europe is racist as fuck and lets adults fuck minors in a way we find disgusting here. I don't view Europe as morally superior.
Everywhere in the world suffers with this shit. To try and localise these issues to certain parts of the globe is nuts.He was charged with something. Why do you think there was a trial?
Life is life. Being able to live another 30+ years a free man vs being in jail is different. That's not an angle, that's what it is.
And fuck Europe. People act like it's some shining example of proper behavior. Europe is racist as fuck and lets adults fuck minors in a way we find disgusting here. I don't view Europe as morally superior.
Went exactly how I expected. I'd go into detail on why you are wrong, but if your at this age and still dont understand what I was getting at, its pointless. I'm sure other understood what I was getting at.
And Americans calling other countries super racist is always funny. As for the last part, I'm going to assume you either made that up, or its a big reach from the actual truth or law out there. But i'm sure you'll double down on it
Everywhere in the world suffers with this shit. To try and localise these issues to certain parts of the globe is nuts.
But I know you like to troll these kinda topics.
There’s aspects of every country you could pull for good points and bad points, it’s all relative to what angle you wanna go with .What's trolling to say Europe isn't morally superior? Everywhere does suffer with issues. That's my point. Don't treat shit like it's how things should be done just because Europe does it.
There’s aspects of every country you could pull for good points and bad points, it’s all relative to what angle you wanna go with .
A lot of european fans are racist, a lot of major clubs (Italian etc) have ultras fan groups which are borderline neo nazi, some are.Agreed. So if the idea is that America is handling something wrong, say it's wrong. Not "Europe does it this way..." without even saying how that's fared better for them. Just that it's the European way.
You're British. You follow soccer? Tell him about how things went for Rashford, Sancho, and Saka for missing those PK's.
The state doesn’t have stand your ground.