Is Terrence Howard The Real Life Tony Stark
- Thread starter Goldie
- Start date
GOAT
🐐
I like that NDT actually responded to Terrence with the video but i still want a "debate" w Terrence.
A debate is what he asked for if not w NDT (which is his preference) than w any professional in the field.
I want to see how Terrence would respond to the things NDT said.
Not gonna lie as soon as NDT started talkin about square roots of fractions i was lost
A debate is what he asked for if not w NDT (which is his preference) than w any professional in the field.
I want to see how Terrence would respond to the things NDT said.
Not gonna lie as soon as NDT started talkin about square roots of fractions i was lost
GOAT
🐐
I wonder how many nights Terrence spent reading NDT's red citations on his 36page thesis.
I know he was sour as hell when he got that back.
Him askin for a debate i bet he got some shit up his sleeve to say.
Im tryn hear it
But then again maybe NDT is correct about everything and he can actually show Terrence the light. It could be a beautiful teaching moment for Terrence and anyone riding w him.
I know he was sour as hell when he got that back.
Him askin for a debate i bet he got some shit up his sleeve to say.
Im tryn hear it
But then again maybe NDT is correct about everything and he can actually show Terrence the light. It could be a beautiful teaching moment for Terrence and anyone riding w him.
TheNightKing
J.A.P.A.N.
I commend NDT for addressing this.
Although I think Terrance’s assumptions are intriguing, I believe NDT is right to pressure test those assumptions under established scientific methods and have Terrance’s assumptions evaluated by others.
I think that is the path, not so much a debate. The worst thing one can do is debate someone whose logic might be on shaky ground. You just end up in circular arguments and it doesn’t really go anywhere because you are put in a position to disprove rather than have them prove.
Although I think Terrance’s assumptions are intriguing, I believe NDT is right to pressure test those assumptions under established scientific methods and have Terrance’s assumptions evaluated by others.
I think that is the path, not so much a debate. The worst thing one can do is debate someone whose logic might be on shaky ground. You just end up in circular arguments and it doesn’t really go anywhere because you are put in a position to disprove rather than have them prove.
The Lonious Monk
Celestial Souljah
Howard wanting a debate with NDT is low key insulting. That's like some random dude questioning an NBA players BBall knowledge and then insisting that they play a game to prove who's right. I mean there's nothing wrong in principle with someone issuing that challenge, but if it were a basketball thing everyone would be looking at that dude like he was crazy.
What NDT was trying to say in a nice way is that learning some surface level shit about science is easy, but actually getting the knowledge and understanding necessary to truly know what you're talking about takes a lot of time and study. NDT could tell by what Howard wrote that he's not at that level yet, so what purpose would a debate serve?
Agree with all of this
I know for me the point of the debate is what I love to tell smart dumb niggas
"You sound smart to somebody dumb"
This would go exactly the way we all think it would.
Howard is going to run out of rehearsed talking points when ndt refutes everything he says, then it's gonna be "you think what you think, I'll do the same"
Fuck him mane
It's insulting but also par for the course in today's age of "I did my own research so I'm as knowledgeable as people who studied and worked this topic for decades."
GOAT
🐐
NDT said himself that he was actually friends w Howard and hung out on a few occasions. Howard didnt pick NDT to debate out of thin air. He basically said NDT ghosted him after he gave him the thesis. Which NDT kinda confirmed in the response video.
Saying NDT is above a debate or at least a conversation w Terrence is a stretch. It doesn't need to be on Joe Rogan, NDT has his own podcast where he will entertain comedians and ppl like Steve-O but cant sit down w Terrence?
I want them in the same room
I want NDT to explain to Terrence why he didnt kill gravity.
Why he didnt kill cranes.
I want NDT to ask Terrence to explain how suns fart out planets.
Make him explain his nonsense and tell him why he is incorrect.
If anything that is NDT responsibility as an ambassador of his field. Hes basically Americas pop culture face of science and astrophysics.
Should be quick work and would do numbers not sure why hes duckin.
Saying NDT is above a debate or at least a conversation w Terrence is a stretch. It doesn't need to be on Joe Rogan, NDT has his own podcast where he will entertain comedians and ppl like Steve-O but cant sit down w Terrence?
I want them in the same room
I want NDT to explain to Terrence why he didnt kill gravity.
Why he didnt kill cranes.
I want NDT to ask Terrence to explain how suns fart out planets.
Make him explain his nonsense and tell him why he is incorrect.
If anything that is NDT responsibility as an ambassador of his field. Hes basically Americas pop culture face of science and astrophysics.
Should be quick work and would do numbers not sure why hes duckin.
TheNightKing
J.A.P.A.N.
Sounded to me like Terrance ghosted NDT after NDT gave him that ether.
Last edited:
GOAT
🐐
Joe Rogan is a big supporter of Graham Hancock.
Graham Hancock is an author and "independent investigator" of ancient/lost civilizations. He is very successful with this and has been for decades.
He asked for a debate on Joe Rogan and ended up debating a random archeologists. It was pretty bad for him when debating an actual professional in the field.
He looked dumb and that was the consensus of all the commentary on YouTube, Instagram, & Reddit.
You could even tell Rogan halfway thru the episode was losing faith in Hancock.
Debates can be good, i dnt know why anyone would not want this to happen between Terrence & NDT. All the dumb content produced and consumed across platforms. Lets see NDT vs Terryology
Graham Hancock is an author and "independent investigator" of ancient/lost civilizations. He is very successful with this and has been for decades.
He asked for a debate on Joe Rogan and ended up debating a random archeologists. It was pretty bad for him when debating an actual professional in the field.
He looked dumb and that was the consensus of all the commentary on YouTube, Instagram, & Reddit.
You could even tell Rogan halfway thru the episode was losing faith in Hancock.
Debates can be good, i dnt know why anyone would not want this to happen between Terrence & NDT. All the dumb content produced and consumed across platforms. Lets see NDT vs Terryology
GOAT
🐐
Or that Terryology rocked everything NDT has ever known and loved and had him shook.
Terrence askin for the fade
Neil duckin
Inori
NAWF
lol how you figure NDT ghosted him when he actually took time to respond to Howards shit in earnest?
GOAT
🐐
I watched his entire interview and what he said about NDT.
They had plans to do Neils podcast/radio show but after Terrence gave him the paper it never happen.
Now hes on JRE beggin for a debate.
mike030270
Memes
Lol at Peak of "Mt. Stupid"
The Lonious Monk
Celestial Souljah
Conversations and debates are not the same. Any two people can have a conversation. Two people with two vastly different levels of understanding of a subject can't really have a debate. It would be a schooling. If you watched NDT's video, then you know Howard couldn't even take the basic pushback that even undergrads get when taking up a subject in the sciences. He was on Rogan making it seem like NDT trashed him when all he did was give a fair criticism of the treatise.
GOAT
🐐
Thats exactly what im asking for.
I want to see NDT take Terrence Howard to school.
I want to see the conversation.
Disagree. This isn't a competition. It's science and discussion of ideas. It doesn't have to be a me vs you, winner/loser.
Not saying ndt has to do it. He don't have to explain shit. I'd love to see it tho.
Props to him for the vid.