I don't think there was a real concentration on continuity back then.
Niggaz just went at it.
I can't look at the Bible as literally the word of God. And maybe that's where I fall short, but so be it. I see it as how that author understood God to be at the time of his writing.
There absolutely could have been some divine intervention at play.... I'm all for that....
But 1,000's of years later?
All the hands this shit went thru.
Politics, scandals, greed, corruption.....
It's just not likely the book we hold in our hands today is anything more than a guide. I have faith that it'll still lead me in the right direction.
But that faith is not extended to taking every single word literal, and trying to out my ass explain clear contradictory verses prolly written by two completely different people in different years and possibly different languages....
Like none of these words are printed in their original language... And how much gets lost in translation??
Just too much human error involved to get worked up over being verbatim.. especially when most churches to this day still have sermons trying to interpret these same scriptures.
Not to mention, you can listen to 100 sermons from 100 preachers covering the exact same scripture... An each may give a complete different explanation...
It's just all too much IMO to realistically hold a gun to anyones head about a couple of words