VIBE
Do More. Be Legendary.
Show me where Jonah's story is written as "satire"
cuz according to the bible it's a true story that actually happened
the cows even repented...
can cows do that?
Show me where Jonah's story is written as "satire"
cuz according to the bible it's a true story that actually happened
There's way more groups than that.
But we are literally trying to decipher shit that no one truly understands with 2,000 year old instruments...
Reality doesn't care if you believe in it..mit just is.....
I don't think God cares if we believe in him or not, it's just too insignificant...
However.... If we must insist.... There are means to do so.... Just understand... It's more for our benefit than his...
Just my take
the cows even repented...
can cows do that?
a fundamentalist is
"a person who believes in the strict, literal interpretation of scripture in a religion."
so, you don't believe Methuselah lived to be almost 1,000yrs old?
The Bible said he lived to be 969 years old, who knows what that could really mean since our measure of time could be much different than how time was measured while he was alive.
What I do know is that the Bible isn't the only ancient text that cited humans as having prolonged life spans.
Whether he actually lived 969 years as we know or not really isn't important but I do believe he lived, along with many other biblical figures like Adam and Noah, lived much longer than we do now.
idk, maybe
they have feelings
they can feel pain, love & fear
but, you're still dancing around
if Jonah's story was written as a true event, how can you say it wasn't & not call God a liar?
I’m not dancing around at all. I’ve answered you and given you examples and you’re dancing around. I told you that in Jonah 1, until the verse last verse, it is taken as satire.
Here’s a screen shot of a video that breaks down the whole story.
The story of the fish is symbolic to the true Jesus story.
Is this difficult for you to understand? Because I have no other way of telling you this. This is not saying God is a liar, nor was the writer of this book. The cultural writing of the time was much different than ours. They didn’t have a sense of literalism like we do today. They had to paint images to tell a story that told about real events or taught life lessons.
Ken Ham is an absolute literalist. He is beyond illogical. Dr. Hugh Ross is a astrophysicist who is also a theologian. They had a debate over the creation timeline and Ham got owned. Yet he argues it being so literal, which is ridiculous. There is parts that are literal and parts that are not. This isn’t a difficult thing to grasp. This doesn’t come down to one or the other. It can absolutely be both and in saying so this doesn’t call anyone a liar. It’s still telling a story, conveying a message, teaching guidelines, etc. There’s no lying going on. There’s illustrative writing within the Bible and there’s also literal writing. Using the context of the words and sequences that follow, you can figure out what is and isn’t.
Thankfully, our interpretations, and that’s what they are, everyone interprets it a certain way, there’s no way around this, but thankfully our salvation isn’t based on this stuff that really trivial compared to the overall message which is faith in Christ... not faith in a fish or 6 days.
You’re impossible. I ain’t feeding the troll.
That story alone tells you the bible is fiction. Reasonable free thinking people begin to question all god related shit once something like that doesn't sound rightLot’s daughters got him drunk and had sex w him, not Job... his whole family was dead.