Welcome To aBlackWeb

A Black man dies after being shot by Atlanta pigs at Wendy's drive-thru. Update: special prosecutor dropped charges against the pig

Watchin CNN, Atlanta police aint taking the burning of the Wendys lying down. CNN said there is a 10K reward for the person who turns them in. And they showed the clip of the white broad lighting a fire. And claim the police are looking a "enhanced footage"

Shit, durin these covid times. 10K aint no small money.

"riight"
Niggas gone be like

tenor.gif
 
No need to use the taser in the first place....there were two of them and its not like brooks was massive. All these chokeholds and tasers cause more trouble than they're worth.

That said tho, even though it was wrong as shit...when brooks fired that back taser at the one cop it was almost a wrap for him. Your natural instincts are just to return fire when a weapon is pointed at you when you're trained in the military...i would imagine its similar to police training.
 
It wouldn't surprise me at all if the cop that did the shooting says that he thought when he saw dudes arm point back towards them he feared that his hand had the other officers gun in it. So he fired.
 
Y'all still missing the fact a random white broad walks up and starts the fire.

Wtf is going on?

Karen is a pyromaniac too?
 
It wouldn't surprise me at all if the cop that did the shooting says that he thought when he saw dudes arm point back towards them he feared that his hand had the other officers gun in it. So he fired.

He probably will indeed go with something like this but fuck that, that taser was bright yellow.
 
cac is claiming that the police standard is if a taser is aimed at a cop, the cop is supposed to fire his gun...is that true? Or is this cac str8 up lying on tv.

I'm betting it's allowed. This case I think is less of a race thing and more of a bad police practice thing. Most of us think that lethal force should be used solely when a cop's life is in danger. That doesn't really seem to be policy though. If their safety is in jeopardy at all, they have a lot of leverage to respond with lethal force. If the dude was just running away and that's all, it probably would have been a cut dry case against the cop. Since he turned around and tried to fire the taser at the cop, that will probably be enough for the cop to go free.

Like someone else said though, it's crazy that even in this environment, that cop didn't even pause for thought before going for the kill. Dude went so quick from actually doing a decent job of policing to being a killer cop.
 
I'm betting it's allowed. This case I think is less of a race thing and more of a bad police practice thing. Most of us think that lethal force should be used solely when a cop's life is in danger. That doesn't really seem to be policy though. If their safety is in jeopardy at all, they have a lot of leverage to respond with lethal force. If the dude was just running away and that's all, it probably would have been a cut dry case against the cop. Since he turned around and tried to fire the taser at the cop, that will probably be enough for the cop to go free.

Like someone else said though, it's crazy that even in this environment, that cop didn't even pause for thought before going for the kill. Dude went so quick from actually doing a decent job of policing to being a killer cop.

Ugh. I have seen on TV many times n heard from retired cops. Lethal force can only be used if the cops life is in danger or some one else's life in danger.

CNN slowed the tape down and it clearly shows the cop reached for his gun b4 the dude turned n aimed the taser. That cop clearly shot dude cuz he wasnt down for the chase
 
Ugh. I have seen on TV many times n heard from retired cops. Lethal force can only be used if the cops life is in danger or some one else's life in danger.

CNN slowed the tape down and it clearly shows the cop reached for his gun b4 the dude turned n aimed the taser. That cop clearly shot dude cuz he wasnt down for the chase

Yes, but the standard for a cop feeling his or her life is in danger is wide as the ocean. We all agree that this cop didn't need to kill that man. That doesn't change the fact that if he was put on trial, he'd likely say he thought his life was in danger and he'd walk. How do I know that? Because we've seen this same thing happen a million times. The man in this case actually had a weapon. We've seen plenty of cases where cops killed people who were unarmed and still said it was because they felt their lives were in danger. The rules on this are not specific enough to make it a cut and dry case.
 
Back
Top