AZTG
OG
I dont disagree, mostly because we need to trade Randle either way, so adding a Zion or Lavine also means that Randle is gone, so theres addition by subtraction there.Yeah but I don’t think the Knicks need to gamble on Zion either
Zach lavine is a better gamble imo
My concern though is that both players are risky but Lavine would require more assests imo.