You just said had he never won nobody would careNo hypothetical I remember the perception about Dirk.
If Luka is the best player according to y’all then yeah he deserves more flack. Can’t have it both ways.
But he did win so you are just making up something that can’t be proven
And this is after I factually told you he got flack prior to winning but you moved the goalpost and said he didn’t get flack his entire career (which isn’t even smart to say because again he won)
So yeah you’re using hypotheticals
Now you’re using the best player according to us in here as the crux of your argument to say why a 24 year old hasn’t gotten much flack for winning yet. When
1. Nobody in here says he’s the best in the game
2. The original argument is about media perception but you moved the goalposts to talk about perception in here to get a point across and you can’t play both sides
And again luka is too young to have the whole why hasn’t he won yet talk (which should be obvious)
The only outlier for the age thing (24) is probably only Lebron and if you wanna hold Luka to that standard than that’s a glowing assessment on how good you think Luka is
the mavs weren’t supposed to be trying to win a championship in Luka’s first 3-4 years anyways but he’s so good that the mavs have to operate like that but it’s not really fair to luka
So again there’s only Dirk (who got flack) and Jokic (who’s starting to get whispers this season) and nobody else to have a narrative
Thanks for playing
Last edited: