Another thing - this may not be intentional- but notice he use language that assumes responsibility to the entire 13% collectively for all the crime within the group all over, without regard to geographical regions with varying rates that are accordingly higher or lower, and despite the fact the entire 13% isn’t criminal.
The true number is even way smaller. The data he’s going off doesn’t account for how many arrests were unique as opposed to the same individuals. This a totally unrelated video but I recommend check out data they got off this study mentioned at the 8:25 mark. They found that out of 3300 total arrests 2200 of them were arrests of the same 97 individuals in that community over a 5 year time span. That means 3% account for 67% of the arrests. We don’t know the break down of the race of these individuals, but it shows how big a difference a few in number can make in this data.
In light of that, the guy from the clip in that tweet isn’t even giving an accurate representation of how small the group he’s referring to really is, considering his whole point was about trying to say it’s a relatively small group (13%) doing the crime. Well, turns outs it’s actually an even smaller number when you break it down down.
