Elzo69Renaissance
Didnt you hear about the last nigga who swung @ me
U seen that crib? No one who had access to 500k would be living like that
“GRAPHIC”: Ex NFL Player Zac Stacy Caught Beating Baby Moms
- Thread starter figo
- Start date
The Lonious Monk
Celestial Souljah
That may be true, but people get killed for stealing a lot less than 500K. If that shit is true, she might count herself as lucky.
Remedy
Doper Than Coke
If she didn't try to steal his life he need to stfu. Nothing he can say will get him out of this. Neither of them mentioned money once while he brutalized the mother of his child in that video. Then the magnitude of the attack..like how you come back and continue after throwing her into a whole tv...These types be so fucking big and bold until they get caught then they turn into docile bitches with their tails tucked.
SeaSnake
OG
bruh it’s not true lol he don’t got half a million
Allah_U_Akbar
New Member
It’s funny how they call this dude her “alleged abuser”.
Did we not see this guy with our own eyes ABUSING this woman?
DOS_patos
Unverified Legion of Trill member
I guess they saying he didn’t hit her , he threw her.
Innocent until proven guilty, he's alleged until that guilty verdict
Rubato
it only matters to us
Olorun22
Active Member
I see why they be coming after you
Fam in court he's not guilty yet so they can't put the abuser tag on him even though we know he did it. Y'all should know this
Allah_U_Akbar
New Member
He’s not denying the fact that it’s him, though.
I get what you’re saying though.
My point is, he’s not charged with “abusing” her.
I don’t know what the exact charges are against him.
But, it’s like if I’m on video urinating in public and I admit it was me, but they still say I “ALLEGEDLY” urinated in public….. That just don’t make any sense to me.
Rubato
it only matters to us
Yea, I’m sure they are just following the general protocol for this kinda thing tho
Dwayne
Laissez le bon temps rouler
Huh?
By law they have to use the word alleged. That’s what’s he saying
Olorun22
Active Member
I never see you do this in a thread when a black person is killed on camera.
Where is this energy for Ahmad? George floyd? Sandra bland? Tamir rice etc.....
I don't see you say to the abw members that the white supremacists are innocent until proven guilty in the court of law..
But you do in a DV thread lol and I'm just speaking on what I see
The guy asked why he's alleged while in a court hearing and I answered why. I didn't give my opinion on guilt or innocenceI never see you do this in a thread when a black person is killed on camera.
Where is this energy for Ahmad? George floyd? Sandra bland? Tamir rice etc.....
I don't see you say to the abw members that the white supremacists are innocent until proven guilty in the court of law..
But you do in a DV thread lol and I'm just speaking on what I see
Olorun22
Active Member
We're on a message board and we don't have to say alleged. Nobody is going to get sue for calling someone guilty when they haven't been tried yet.
Dwayne
Laissez le bon temps rouler
Bruh. It was a response to the video and the words they used and bruh gave the reason to why it was used.
us being on the ABW and what we words we would use is irrelevant to their convo about the words used in the video