Welcome To aBlackWeb

Register

FEATURED Who You Got: Drake, Kendrick or Cole?

test

Drake's lawsuit against UMG

  • For the culture

  • Embarrassing and shameful

  • Just take the L and make some more music

Results are only viewable after voting.
BlackRain said:
Yes and no. Yes because it does reframe the popularity if NLU and goes against this image people have placed on Kendrick of him being anti everything corporate when it comes to hip hop. No because as has been said Draks has also most likely benefited from the same practices.
Click to expand...

Fam, reframe it how? We all lived through this shit together. We didn’t need numbers on a chart to tell us what we all witnessed in real time.
 
BlackRain said:
The core he's trying to prove is that UMG boosted NLU to lower Drake's value while he negotiating a new deal. And if they did do that along with lowering the percentage value of the stream then that is fucked up. But Drake ain't a sympathetic figure so ain't nobody gonna care if that shit was used against him.
Click to expand...

I'm sure that's the justification for the case, but how much was his value really lowered when he was still among the most streamed artists throughout the beef. Stream boosting is apparently pretty common, so it might be difficult for him to prove specific maliciousness against him.
 
Rickyrich said:
If this was any other artist yall be rootin for them to go at the label but since its drake yall dissin
Click to expand...
It’s not like he’s trying to do this for getting jerked for his music.

Ppl might side with Drake if there’s proof of him getting jerked or illegal practices.

This is a dumb ass waste of time action over him being mad he lost a battle.

Do you think if things went another way and he was perceived as the winner he would be suing or talking about suing ?
 
The Lonious Monk said:
I'm sure that's the justification for the case, but how much was his value really lowered when he was still among the most streamed artists throughout the beef. Stream boosting is apparently pretty common, so it might be difficult for him to prove specific maliciousness against him.
Click to expand...

I mean there's definitely a case to be made his value was lowered because his public image did take a hit. But as you said he'd have to prove it was aided by UMG. And that's where he's gonna be struggling to prove
 
unSCENE said:
Fam, reframe it how? We all lived through this shit together. We didn’t need numbers on a chart to tell us what we all witnessed in real time.
Click to expand...

It reframes it only in a strictly numbers way. It doesn't reframe the impact of the song. But for people who also use numbers to justify a songs impact if the streams were boosted then all the "NLU was #1 for 8 weeks" doesnt matter. It never should have but to a certain segment it does.
 
BlackRain said:
I mean there's definitely a case to be made his value was lowered because his public image did take a hit. But as you said he'd have to prove it was aided by UMG. And that's where he's gonna be struggling to prove
Click to expand...

Yeah, I'd argue his image was hurt more by him acting like a bitch than NLU. Most people thought that was the knockout punch in the beef, but everyone was giving Drake credit for making the beef interesting.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top