My logic is one of them are going to be president so I might as well try to get the one in office that’s going to do the best by me.Nah I don’t agree
If your choices were Vin Diesel or Hawk Tuah girl you’d still vote?
There’s no point where you would say this election is below my tolerance level for acceptable candidates?
How do you incentivize the people who pick candidates for us to do better?My logic is one of them are going to be president so I might as well try to get the one in office that’s going to do the best by me.
If we could organize and make a point by withholding our vote I’d be down, but I’m not throwing it away for nothing.
When you say incentivize the people who pick candidates, are you referring to the democratic or republican parties? Just want to clarify so I can answer appropriately.How do you incentivize the people who pick candidates for us to do better?
I’ll include @AP3.0 too cause I hear yall
I guess that depends on who you are but let’s say Democrats for the sake of discussionWhen you say incentivize the people who pick candidates, are you referring to the democratic or republican parties? Just want to clarify so I can answer appropriately.
Got it.I guess that depends on who you are but let’s say Democrats for the sake of discussion
So we can only encourage better candidates by helping them lose so they do better next time? Which also hurts us in process? Kind of a fucked up process when you think about it lolGot it.
It’s pretty simple actually. The only incentive driving either party is winning.
So the real question is can we find a candidate to get behind that will keep our best interests at heart AND be able to win.
How do they do that? Convince 80 million people that our best interests matter to them too or make them feel indifferent to them. Indifference comes from our best interests not impeding on their life or being countered with benefits of their own.
Only problem for black people is the racism in our country. Black benefits impede on the sensibilities of racists on both sides. It’s a sad reality I hope we can overcome one day.
And if I understand your reply, this is what the non voting crowd premise is. They lose by us not voting so if they want to win the next time, they'll have to give us something to get our voteSo we can only encourage better candidates by helping them lose so they do better next time? Which also hurts us in process? Kind of a fucked up process when you think about it lol
That’s actually what the don’t vote crowd says. So yes, that is a fucked up way of going about it.So we can only encourage better candidates by helping them lose so they do better next time? Which also hurts us in process? Kind of a fucked up process when you think about it lol
Voting doesn’t exempt one from being part of the problems going on…still don’t agree with your last point. And my gripe is limited to presidential candidate selection not congressional races. I plan to vote at the congressional level.@Rubato
I think the issue is understanding that if we are going to really shake shit up, we may not see immediate results for maybe 2-3 voting cycles and some people aren't in this for the long haul. They want things like __________ next fall or they burning shit down.
It's a slow burn. It takes time to strategize then mobilize. The brother Gary Chambers here in baton rouge ran for a Senate seat that was going to be vacated by another brotha. He was the definition of grass roots. He was talking the talk and walking the walk and when it came time to vote, people stayed home.
1.3M people voted and 18% voted for him. He didn't even win the parish he was born and raised in. 62% voted for a cac Republican who has not done shit for Louisiana since he's been in the US Senate.
Using my example from earlier. My kids might be adults so things I'm voting on might not impact them, but my vote along with their votes will impact any kids they may parent in the next 1-5 years as they will be direct beneficiaries of those voting acts/policies.
Simply put, you can't afford to stay home
You don't get to stay home and keep complaining about things while also being part of the problem.
Exactly this. There are a lot of good candidates and good people out there but they aren’t getting the shine because non-presidential election cycles and local cycles don’t get our turnout. Then when the presidential election comes around and the politicians who were able to mobilize a base gets the nomination, everybody is up in arms.@Rubato
I think the issue is understanding that if we are going to really shake shit up, we may not see immediate results for maybe 2-3 voting cycles and some people aren't in this for the long haul. They want things like __________ next fall or they burning shit down.
It's a slow burn. It takes time to strategize then mobilize. The brother Gary Chambers here in baton rouge ran for a Senate seat that was going to be vacated by another brotha. He was the definition of grass roots. He was talking the talk and walking the walk and when it came time to vote, people stayed home.
1.3M people voted and 18% voted for him. He didn't even win the parish he was born and raised in. 62% voted for a cac Republican who has not done shit for Louisiana since he's been in the US Senate.
Using my example from earlier. My kids might be adults so things I'm voting on might not impact them, but my vote along with their votes will impact any kids they may parent in the next 1-5 years as they will be direct beneficiaries of those voting acts/policies.
Simply put, you can't afford to stay home
You don't get to stay home and keep complaining about things while also being part of the problem.
But it’s typically congress members or governors that get the nominations. So you can’t just focus on the presidential nomination, it starts at the state and local level.Voting doesn’t exempt one from being part of the problems going on…still don’t agree with your last point. And my gripe is limited to presidential candidate selection not congressional races. I plan to vote at the congressional level.
If you’re trying to talk me out of voting at all it’s kinda workingBut it’s typically congress members or governors that get the nominations. So you can’t just focus on the presidential nomination, it starts at the state and local level.
So if your gripe is with the presidential nomination, that gripe has to be extended to the state and local level too.
Definitely not. Just saying by time we get to the presidential you’re stuck with voting for the lesser of two evils. And in this one there’s an huge gap.If you’re trying to talk me out of voting at all it’s kinda working
@Rubato
I think the issue is understanding that if we are going to really shake shit up, we may not see immediate results for maybe 2-3 voting cycles and some people aren't in this for the long haul. They want things like __________ next fall or they burning shit down.
It's a slow burn. It takes time to strategize then mobilize. The brother Gary Chambers here in baton rouge ran for a Senate seat that was going to be vacated by another brotha. He was the definition of grass roots. He was talking the talk and walking the walk and when it came time to vote, people stayed home.
1.3M people voted and 18% voted for him. He didn't even win the parish he was born and raised in. 62% voted for a cac Republican who has not done shit for Louisiana since he's been in the US Senate.
Using my example from earlier. My kids might be adults so things I'm voting on might not impact them, but my vote along with their votes will impact any kids they may parent in the next 1-5 years as they will be direct beneficiaries of those voting acts/policies.
Simply put, you can't afford to stay home
You don't get to stay home and keep complaining about things while also being part of the problem.
Appreciate the response famVoting doesn’t exempt one from being part of the problems going on…still don’t agree with your last point. And my gripe is limited to presidential candidate selection not congressional races. I plan to vote at the congressional level.
That would certainly open up a more viable field of alternativesId actually be curious to hear from the no vote folks... if rank choice voting was a thing across the country..which it 100% should be... and you could pick your top choice of candidate without having to worry about them being a potential "spoiler"... who would you vote for? Who are the options?