Welcome To aBlackWeb

Should She Be Sent To Prison?

Should She Be Sent To Prison

  • Yes, that's involuntary manslaughter

    Votes: 16 80.0%
  • No

    Votes: 4 20.0%

  • Total voters
    20
Ppl get charge with negligence all the time for the actions of others that they have influenced

No different in this situation here other than when parents are charged for the actions of their child, difference is, the parents are not encouraging the kids to do such act, but they are responsible for such act of a minor.
 
The entire point of law is to punish those who are harmful to society.....

Niggaz got misguided at some point cuz now law is just a pissing contest to see how good a lawyer is at getting guilty people off due top loop holes and flaws in an imperfect system.

But at its core.... it comes down to fair or foul....


Kill the bitch
 
Ppl get charge with negligence all the time for the actions of others that they have influenced

No different in this situation here other than when parents are charged for the actions of their child, difference is, the parents are not encouraging the kids to do such act, but they are responsible for such act of a minor.


The term negligence would mean that she was responsible for him, which she's not. Those parents are responsible for those children. Not the same.
 
The term negligence would mean that she was responsible for him, which she's not. Those parents are responsible for those children. Not the same.

That's just one of the scopes of what the word means, it also means to exercise the appropriate and or ethical ruled care expected to be exercised amongst specified circumstances.

She caused the man's death by her negligence breh
 
That's just one of the scopes of what the word means, it also means to exercise the appropriate and or ethical ruled care expected to be exercised amongst specified circumstances.

She caused the man's death by her negligence breh

Again, causation. He was already talking about killing himself prior to her, she didn;t cause these suicidal thoughts.
 
The entire point of law is to punish those who are harmful to society.....

Niggaz got misguided at some point cuz now law is just a pissing contest to see how good a lawyer is at getting guilty people off due top loop holes and flaws in an imperfect system.

But at its core.... it comes down to fair or foul....


Kill the bitch

Laws and rules were made cause we're not all going to agree on what's wrong or right, so there has to be laws and rules. She did not break any law.
 
Again, causation. He was already talking about killing himself prior to her, she didn;t cause these suicidal thoughts.


That has nothing do with anything breh, ppl have premeditated thoughts every minute by the minute.

If you contribute to something that's detrimental, you're at fault breh and then you're assisting with the act, breh you're at fault.


If you say, "man I'm thinking about killing my mama next month/year/day" and yo patna on some, man this is how you should do it, use poison, use this type of gun, tie her up, you should drown her, you should use this that and the third to do so, you think once the court ppl find out that your patna of yours told you these things, they will let him be free and be off somewhere chilling in the Bahamas while you're on trial??

Come on breh
 
Again, causation. He was already talking about killing himself prior to her, she didn;t cause these suicidal thoughts.
the messages you posted seemed to be in reference to self-harm, not suicide. she said "you'll feel worse after" in response.
The entire point of law is to punish those who are harmful to society.....

Niggaz got misguided at some point cuz now law is just a pissing contest to see how good a lawyer is at getting guilty people off due top loop holes and flaws in an imperfect system.

But at its core.... it comes down to fair or foul....


Kill the bitch
Laws and rules were made cause we're not all going to agree on what's wrong or right, so there has to be laws and rules. She did not break any law.
both good points. look @ ABW fam, debating the purpose of the law itself lol
 
Negligence is a failure to take reasonable care to avoid causing injury or loss to another person.

(We can stop right there)


There are four steps in proving negligence. The plaintiff must prove: that there is a duty in the circumstances to take care duty of care. ... that the damage was caused by the breach of duty
 
That has nothing do with anything breh, ppl have premeditated thoughts every minute by the minute.

If you contribute to something that's detrimental, you're at fault breh and then you're assisting with the act, breh you're at fault.


If you say, "man I'm thinking about killing my mama next month/year/day" and yo patna on some, man this is how you should do it, use poison, use this type of gun, tie her up, you should drown her, you should use this that and the third to do so, you think once the court ppl find out that your patna of yours told you these things, they will let him be free and be off somewhere chilling in the Bahamas while you're on trial??

Come on breh


Causation has nothing to do with it? lol It has everything to do with the case. U keep talking about negligence. That does not apply here.
 
Causation has nothing to do with it? lol It has everything to do with the case. U keep talking about negligence. That does not apply here.

How does it not breh, she was being negligent by sending those text message on causing injury to himself?

You can't assist in harming someone nor yourself and get away it once you've been caught

So if 19-40 year old man goes out and kills his gf and then the prosecutor shows, you the judge, text messages from his dad saying this is how you should kill your ex, then the Dad gets off free with no charge?
 
Laws and rules were made cause we're not all going to agree on what's wrong or right, so there has to be laws and rules. She did not break any law.
See that's my point.

The court is trying to prove If she " broke a law"'


Regardless if she broke a law, she still dead ass Wrong...

And being that wrong in my opinion Weighs heavier than the law to me...

And Since when did yall anti government Niggaz become such advocates for our legal system....

These Niggaz been fucking up for like 400 years.... But now all of a sudden they got it right??

Foh
 
Breh she's an accessory to the crime, no matter how you try and spend it.

An accessory to a crime is a person who participates knowingly and voluntarily in the commission of a crime. An accessory can be categorized as before or after the fact (the commission of the crime). They need not be actually present at the scene of the crime in order to be held liable.


Shid my ole lady was a beast with this law game, and I watch to much Judge Mathis not to be up on this law thing, (I miss her) may shoot that "Hey U" text but just like they get niggas on conspiracy to sell drugs, Are they really selling drugs (no) but the plot, plan, trick, ploy is all that they need to charge yo ass.
 
Last edited:
How does it not breh, she was being negligent by sending those text message on causing injury to himself?

You can't assist in harming someone nor yourself and get away it once you've been caught

So if 19-40 year old man goes out and kills his gf and then the prosecutor shows, you the judge, text messages from his dad saying this is how you should kill your ex, then the Dad gets off free with no charge?



@ bolded , she didn't cause bodily harm. Not physically.............. and he was already thinking about doing it prior to her so she didn't even mentally CAUSE it either.


Causation bruh
 
Back
Top