Knock_Twice
2 Words
Her negligence cause the death of the dude.
She should be charge for her negligence
She should be charge for her negligence
Ppl get charge with negligence all the time for the actions of others that they have influenced
No different in this situation here other than when parents are charged for the actions of their child, difference is, the parents are not encouraging the kids to do such act, but they are responsible for such act of a minor.
The term negligence would mean that she was responsible for him, which she's not. Those parents are responsible for those children. Not the same.
That's just one of the scopes of what the word means, it also means to exercise the appropriate and or ethical ruled care expected to be exercised amongst specified circumstances.
She caused the man's death by her negligence breh
The entire point of law is to punish those who are harmful to society.....
Niggaz got misguided at some point cuz now law is just a pissing contest to see how good a lawyer is at getting guilty people off due top loop holes and flaws in an imperfect system.
But at its core.... it comes down to fair or foul....
Kill the bitch
Again, causation. He was already talking about killing himself prior to her, she didn;t cause these suicidal thoughts.
the messages you posted seemed to be in reference to self-harm, not suicide. she said "you'll feel worse after" in response.Again, causation. He was already talking about killing himself prior to her, she didn;t cause these suicidal thoughts.
The entire point of law is to punish those who are harmful to society.....
Niggaz got misguided at some point cuz now law is just a pissing contest to see how good a lawyer is at getting guilty people off due top loop holes and flaws in an imperfect system.
But at its core.... it comes down to fair or foul....
Kill the bitch
both good points. look @ ABW fam, debating the purpose of the law itself lolLaws and rules were made cause we're not all going to agree on what's wrong or right, so there has to be laws and rules. She did not break any law.
That has nothing do with anything breh, ppl have premeditated thoughts every minute by the minute.
If you contribute to something that's detrimental, you're at fault breh and then you're assisting with the act, breh you're at fault.
If you say, "man I'm thinking about killing my mama next month/year/day" and yo patna on some, man this is how you should do it, use poison, use this type of gun, tie her up, you should drown her, you should use this that and the third to do so, you think once the court ppl find out that your patna of yours told you these things, they will let him be free and be off somewhere chilling in the Bahamas while you're on trial??
Come on breh
Metaphorically speaking dude was on the edge she gave him the nudge to jump off, it's technically not illegal, but it should be.
Causation has nothing to do with it? lol It has everything to do with the case. U keep talking about negligence. That does not apply here.
See that's my point.Laws and rules were made cause we're not all going to agree on what's wrong or right, so there has to be laws and rules. She did not break any law.
Can you give me the definition of negligence, I admit, I don't know much about lawBreh that's being negligence
How does it not breh, she was being negligent by sending those text message on causing injury to himself?
You can't assist in harming someone nor yourself and get away it once you've been caught
So if 19-40 year old man goes out and kills his gf and then the prosecutor shows, you the judge, text messages from his dad saying this is how you should kill your ex, then the Dad gets off free with no charge?