OPINION Contradictions and Lies! Exposing the Democratic Party

[Knock_Twice]

The cycle is usually:

1) Dems do nothing
2) Republicans get elected
3) Republicans make shit worse
4) Dems get elected

And repeat

I think Dems rely on the Republicans fucking up so they don't have to promise anything other than "we're not them"

Which is why I said 3 or 4 days ago, FBAs, that crowd 18-45 will not support going back to plan A.
Options 4...where FBAs are at the bottom and everybody is good to live and roam free.

If FBAS are going to suffer under white supremacy, then everybody will suffer

Its only when the Dems are in office that black folks suffer the worst and are the only group that suffers while everyone else gets the benefits and hand outs

See the Somalia scam

Who was in office when that took place??
Dems or the Republicans?

 

[BlackRain]

This has been debunked. You already admitted to misquoting me.

You've admitted more than once you're inclined to be contrarian

 

[BlackRain]

I don't interject bc things are too pro left. Things are always too pro left. I simply point out hypocrisies, if im wrong I'll admit it.

When I say I was vague it's not bc it was intentional it's bc I wasn't asked to clarify or it didn't turn into a debate

U really take shit i say and twist it based on your preconceived notions, you've done it before and admitted to it.

There's no twist. I never said you don't admit when you're wrong. I said what I've consistently said about you. That your attempts to both sides everything doesn't hold up. You've staunchly defended that stance before. Multiple posters have told you that your attempts to make an equivalence between some things doesn't work.

 

[ChicagoFigure]

You've admitted more than once you're inclined to be contrarian

Post proof or stop making these claims

 

[ChicagoFigure]

There's no twist. I never said you don't admit when you're wrong. I said what I've consistently said about you. That your attempts to both sides everything doesn't hold up.

U made a false claim that I feel the need to interject when things are "too pro left". I said bc this is a heavily Dem website there is more Dem hypocrisy to point out by default. U twisted that to mean something else like you've done with other things I've said even tho it's been spelled out for u multiple times now.

You've staunchly defended that stance before. Multiple posters have told you that your attempts to make an equivalence between some things doesn't work.

Ok, and if they can convince me I'm wrong I'll admit it..if they don't, in my opinion, those "multiple posters" are wrong. So what.

 

[Mr BFK]

You still in such defense mode you missed the sarcasm and typed all that just end up proving the point that you are easily duped. Good job. It's also telling when you're comfortable using the same language and descriptions racist are and see no issue with it

please explain the bolded

 

[Mr BFK]

Apparently according to him having Meg The Stallion support you is just as bad as having literal nazis on stage supporting you. Great argument

Bringing out Quavo... Bad

Bringing out Kid Rock... Cool

No type of logic to these weird convoluted "justifications" for letting a white supremacist con artist rapist and suspected pedophile back in the white house.

these posts right here let me know that u didn't expect Kamala to win either

or u were both naive enough to believe shit is really fair and u really thought she was going to be judged to the same standard as trump

 

[Mr BFK]

@Mr BFK

No one is against different opinions fam

Let's make that crystal clear

What people are against are blatantly uninformed ones especially when these people accuse the other side of the discussion as being overly emotional under the guise of group think.

Well, wouldn't the other side of the discussion be group think as well? Or is it only group think when someone or a group of like minded people are trying to highlight the faulty basis of what your opinions are based in?

I think outside of you defaulting to everyone that disagrees with you being emotional, you've been pretty civil and I appreciate that but this position you've taken is like you trying to tell your homeboy he got something caught in his beard cause you can see it and he tells you that's impossible cause he made sure he checked his beard before he left the house.

I hear u and I can respect disagreement........but the bolded is what I was referring to

who in here is "qualified" enough to state someone else's opinion is uninformed?


no one dropped any actual "bonafides" in here....... but yet mofos are way too confident in being dismissive/hurling insults all the time in this forum

and ironically I could argue I have more objective credentials than most in this forum........but I don't even go there fr cuz this place is just joke time for me



I don't see ur groupthink counter-argument becuz ya'll stay busy attacking the poster

vs.

attacking the actual premise of the poster's argument.....that's why I say others have gotten emotional




I wasn't going to write a whole book on geopolitics/the economy/current affairs

when my points about Kamala being a weak candidate still reinforce my belief that things wouldn't be much better than what we got right now

 

[BlackRain]

these posts right here let me know that u didn't expect Kamala to win either

or u were both naive enough to believe shit is really fair and u really thought she was going to be judged to the same standard as trump

Or.. you're just wrong in the reasons behind your assessment. When asked multiple times to point out actual policies of hers you think would not have worked you went to "she had Meg Thee Stallion endorse her".

 

[BlackRain]

Post proof or stop making these claims

Trust me, I don't expect them to land here. But I'm still gonna get them off whether u guys like it or not.

Its a message board. It doesn't have to be needed. Its still relevant

And you flat out saying you'd probably be reduced to one in a real life discussion

Irl im around a wider variety of politcal beliefs that if it was reflected on here I'd prob just be reduced to a contrarian

And your somehow misguided idea that because you feel the board is more liberal leaning that means there's more hypocrisy to call out on the left because as you said you dont get pushback when calling out Republicans. Using your logic what that would actually mean is that more things on the left are discussed not that more actual hypocrisy exists. Those are different things you've conflated.

Both said in response to discussing your need to both sides and be contrarian. You won't use the word but admit to using the same tactics

 

[ChicagoFigure]

And you flat out saying you'd probably be reduced to one in a real life discussion



And your somehow misguided idea that because you feel the board is more liberal leaning that means there's more hypocrisy to call out on the left because as you said you dont get pushback when calling out Republicans. Using your logic what that would actually mean is that more things on the left are discussed not that more actual hypocrisy exists. Those are different things you've conflated.

Both said in response to discussing your need to both sides and be contrarian. You won't use the word but admit to using the same tactics

The last quote was already explained to u which is the one u admitted to misunderstanding. Crazy u are using it yet again. The other quotes don't mean I'm Contrarian it only means I'm not gonna stop expressing my opinions just bc u don't like it.

U Just in here saying anything.

 

[ChicagoFigure]

And your somehow misguided idea that because you feel the board is more liberal leaning that means there's more hypocrisy to call out on the left because as you said you dont get pushback when calling out Republicans. Using your logic what that would actually mean is that more things on the left are discussed not that more actual hypocrisy exists. Those are different things you've conflated.

The political threads are overwhelmingly supportive of democrats and u guys show your hypocrisy often. Nothing u said here disputes that.

 

[BlackRain]

The political threads are overwhelmingly supportive of democrats and u guys show your hypocrisy often. Nothing u said here disputes that.

That doesn't mean that there's more hypocrisy to call out on the Dems. That just means because you view the board as more left leaning you see those opportunities more. If the board was more right leaning then by your logic you'd be in here calling them out and making pro Democrat posts.

 

[BlackRain]

The last quote was already explained to u which is the one u admitted to misunderstanding. Crazy u are using it yet again. The other quotes don't mean I'm Contrarian it only means I'm not gonna stop expressing my opinions just bc u don't like it.

U Just in here saying anything.

That last quote is you saying in your own words you'd be viewed as contrarian. Thats not me saying anything thats repeating your own words.

 

[AP4.0]

I hear u and I can respect disagreement........but the bolded is what I was referring to

who in here is "qualified" enough to state someone else's opinion is uninformed?


no one dropped any actual "bonafides" in here....... but yet mofos are way too confident in being dismissive/hurling insults all the time in this forum

and ironically I could argue I have more objective credentials than most in this forum........but I don't even go there fr cuz this place is just joke time for me



I don't see ur groupthink counter-argument becuz ya'll stay busy attacking the poster

vs.

attacking the actual premise of the poster's argument.....that's why I say others have gotten emotional




I wasn't going to write a whole book on geopolitics/the economy/current affairs

when my points about Kamala being a weak candidate still reinforce my belief that things wouldn't be much better than what we got right now

IDK what else to call it when you admitted you weren't up on Kamala's proposed policies when you said things wouldn't be much better with her in office had she won

Again, even if the bar was status quo and she kept everything Biden did, that was still better than what's currently happening. To me, in this discussion, it should be ok to point out obvious things. That shouldn't require any qualifications.

I think there is some confusion that we (myself, czar, black, etc .) would be just fine with that and I feel pretty confident that I can speak for them when I say you would be wrong.

Things could always be better. We should always demand more of the political representatives in office but to Chicago's point, if the Republicans can put the bar back in hell, the Democrats will always look like the knights in shining armor when they have to come in and clean things up

 

[ChicagoFigure]

That doesn't mean that there's more hypocrisy to call out on the Dems. That just means because you view the board as more left leaning you see those opportunities more. If the board was more right leaning then by your logic you'd be in here calling them out and making pro Democrat posts.

The consistency is ill call it out whenever it happens. Regardless of party. But like u said since there are more pro Dems here, once again, by default........

 

[ChicagoFigure]

That last quote is you saying in your own words you'd be viewed as contrarian. Thats not me saying anything thats repeating your own words.

Bruh u literally admitted u misinterpreted that post (your own words) and you're in here misinterpreting it again. Are u okay?

 

[BlackRain]

The consistency is ill call it out whenever it happens. Regardless of party. But like u said since there are more pro Dems here, once again, by default........

But you're not consisten at all with it. Like when the back and forth was happening previously about media access and control over what does and doesn't get reported. You kept trying to both sides it after already admitting that one has gone further than the other. But because you're so committed to seeing both sides as equal you just couldn't leave it at it being worse.

 

[ChicagoFigure]

But you're not consisten at all with it. Like when the back and forth was happening previously about media access and control over what does and doesn't get reported. You kept trying to both sides it after already admitting that one has gone further than the other. But because you're so committed to seeing both sides as equal you just couldn't leave it at it being worse.

Now you're moving the argument to something else without acknowledging why I criticize Dems more on this board. U can disagree with how I equate things I don't care about that. So what.

 

[BlackRain]

Now you're moving the argument to something else without acknowledging why I criticize Dems more on this board. U can disagree with how I equate things I don't care about that. So what.

Im not moving anything. I acknowledged why you say you criticize them more i just don't think you apply that logic as consistently as you think all around. The disagreement has always been rooted in the bold because it's consistently lead to you trying to equate things that lack perspective you either intentionally ignore, you wanna revist that terrible Aaron Roger's and MLK are the same take or Joe Rogan takes, or try and downplay because it's out of your wheelhouse to actually understand ie whenever race is brought into the conversation.

You seem to take umbrage at the consistent thought that you're mascarading as a maga republican yet don't see how your consistent defenses of any criticism of them paints that picture. Again given the reasoning you gave if this board was more right leaning then would you be just as critical of Republicans as you are Democrats? Based on what you're saying you would be...but whenever any criticism of them is brought up you jump right to the defense of them to try and minimize things.