Golden
Administrator
That isn't nature. There are men who are emotional thinkers and women who are logical, and neither are he exception. Assigning personality characteristics to the sexes isn't helpful, it's limiting. Doesn't take into account individualism and helps further the gender divide by approaching the sexes like we're different species. That's gender essentialism.You gon have to post more than smh. You can't deny nature b
Nah it wasn't a misunderstanding, just grouping being near each other but not interacting under quality time didn't seem right to me personally. Also, the only alternative to Netflix and chill isn't a restaurant. There are parks, aquariums, museums, endless options that have nothing to do with getting dressed up.I want to clear up any misunderstanding you may have, please, elaborate
If all or most of the quality time you get is sitting next to each other and hardly interacting... and simply getting out of the house and doing shit together is the exception, not the rule? Idk. Maybe it varies by couple and people with indoor interests will enjoy that more but it doesn't read like a healthy aim to me personally.
Outings aren't solely planned by men so again, that was one of the things that I wasn't sure why they were squarely directed at women.
Take the emasculation statement. What you described is someone's efforts being undermined and not respected. That would be just as much a problem if the offence was being done from the man to the woman, yet you termed it emasculation and framed it as an attack on the man's place.
A lot of what you described IMO was just people being inconsiderate or unappreciative,it was unnecessarily gendered and playing into stereotypes.