Bill Cosby Sentenced 3-10 Years In Prison

DOS_patos said:
So saying some shit don’t sound right with the trial is apologist shit?

who knew
Click to expand...

Guess that reply function broke. You can't even keep it clean about all that you've said in here. But yeah, not much conversation for your type. Have your little circle jerk in peace.
 
Mister said:
You're not nearly as smart as you think you are. Or I'm not nearly as dumb as you think. Either or, you read what I typed. It's nothing but truth. Refute that or keep it moving. I don't have much conversation for apologists of sexual predators.
Click to expand...


You're either caught up in your emotions..........or you don't understand the judicial system.


Either that or you're being intellectually dishonest and/or disingenuous.


So, yeah, there's no need for further discussion if we can't have an honest conversation.
 
DOS_patos said:
I think y’all go to far with this apologist shit.

we are clearly saying one thing but y’all stay in some shit that wasn’t said nor supported.
Click to expand...


They don't even think about what they're saying.


How can someone be an apologist for a sexual predator..........when it hasn't even been proven in a court of law that he is a sexual predator?



Swaggy P are you serious clip.gif
 
DOS_patos said:
I agree
Hate him once you have proof.
Click to expand...

The proof was used to convict him. The issue at this point shouldn't be whether or not he committed the acts he's accused of because he admitted to it. The issue is the way the court system went about convicting him. The problem is that alot of you niggas on the "Cosby should be free" train conflate the two and often try to assert that since he was convicted using a method that shouldn't have been used, that means he's innocent of the actual crime itself. And that's where you keep running into your biggest problem when you try to defend him on this.
 
And it should never go without mention that...the cases in which people all of a sudden rely solely on a decision made in a court to determine if someone actually did or did not do something seems to only pop up during instances of sexual assault. Which is very telling.
 
BlackRain said:
And it should never go without mention that...the cases in which people all of a sudden rely solely on a decision made in a court to determine if someone actually did or did not do something seems to only pop up during instances of sexual assault. Which is very telling.
Click to expand...
Say what you trynna say.
Please tell me what it says.
 
BlackRain said:
The problem is that alot of you niggas on the "Cosby should be free" train conflate the two and often try to assert that since he was convicted using a method that shouldn't have been used, that means he's innocent of the actual crime itself.
Click to expand...


The problem with a lot of........you.........niggas is that you're not willing to acknowledge that it doesn't make him guilty either.
 
BlackRain said:
Getting a drug for the sole purpose of giving it to someone else for sex without their consent while you remain sober is against the law. That's pretty cut and dry.
Click to expand...
He said he bought them to have sec. He never said without their consent.

Y’all giving one thing all the weight while ignoring the other saying it holds no weight.
 
Disanthrope said:



Hey homie, how you been?
Click to expand...

wait wait wait..

she apologizes after he was exonerated but not after he was released in 98?
after she defamed this man and wrote a book about it to twist the knife?
and SHE wonders how this could have happened?

how can someone read this an not be pissed?
 
DOS_patos said:
wait wait wait..

she apologizes after he was exonerated but not after he was released in 98?
after she defamed this man and wrote a book about it to twist the knife?
and SHE wonders how this could have happened?

how can someone read this an not be pissed?
Click to expand...

He hadn't been proven innocent when he was got released. The only reason this even happened is because one of the original producers of the film adaptation of the belt felt like something wasn't right with the case, dropped out of the film and hired a private Investigator to look into it. If not for the attempt to turn the book into a movie this may have never happened
 
BlackRain said:
He hadn't been proven innocent when he was got released. The only reason this even happened is because one of the original producers of the film adaptation of the belt felt like something wasn't right with the case, dropped out of the film and hired a private Investigator to look into it. If not for the attempt to turn the book into a movie this may have never happened
Click to expand...
I wonder if when he felt something wasn’t right did his people call him a rape apologist or wonder why he went so hard for a man that was “convicted” of rape.

Wonder if when he hired the PI was it also very telling.

Crazy how things can look, depending on how you see things.
 
DOS_patos said:
wait wait wait..

she apologizes after he was exonerated but not after he was released in 98?
after she defamed this man and wrote a book about it to twist the knife?
and SHE wonders how this could have happened?

how can someone read this an not be pissed?
Click to expand...
There s a bbc podcast/story about it.... shit is bonkers
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top