Welcome To aBlackWeb

Register

Kyle Rittenhouse Trial (Jacob Blake Protest Shooting)

VulcanRaven said:
The problem is the law in this country. Do I agree with being able to shoot an unarmed person who is not on your property? No, but if the law says you can then he had the right. No one has not answered my question. Did they chase him or attack him? No one is in anymore danger then they were before after this verdict. I have to agree with bow to royalty. Yall too emotional and not looking at what is reality
Click to expand...

he killed two people and there was enough evidence to put him under.

end of story

lmao @ yall too emotional. he killed two people and harmed someone else tf???
 
Old Man Cain said:
Sigh.......to all those saying why does black people care or him being found not guilty shouldve the correct verdict.

This is same jackass that was video stating at a peaceful rally that "if I had my gun I would kill all them assholes". Ffwd a few hours later when said jackass gets his gun he in fact kills people at the rally. The first dude killed ehhh he started the fight so self defense in that one should've been an easy call. The 2nd killed was a guy had just someone kill a guy so he tried to stop an active shooter. Could that be considered self defense ehhh who knows.

But the 3rd person shot was just shot and he walked away from that charge clean which in itself is a joke.

Now how does this case affect black people. Some lunatic had just witnessed a right wing racist little shot walk from killing 2 people and injuring a 3rd and shooting into a crowd. That lunatic can put it in his mind to go to the next peaceful rally for black lives armed to the teeth and start shooting and easily say it was self defense because the crowd was getting to close to him/her and he felt threatened.

Could that happen maybe maybe not but we all know it did happen and a little shit just walked away with no charges from the help of a inept judge
Click to expand...
If the bold is true then the prosecutor failed to do his job and could have motioned to get the judge removed. Its a white system and it failed white people. As for someone shooting protestors, that can happen anytime just like the church shootings so people were mot safe before but protesting has not yielded any resorts and its past time to attack the system in a different way. That is a differect topic though
 
William Munny said:
The third guy he shot was coming towards him with a drawn pistol pointed at him. How that one not the MOST worthy of self defense?
Click to expand...
Because that gentleman just saw an active shooter kill two people.

Also If this the new norm then when God forbid an active shooter is ever in your area and you're fully strapped and try to save the day and you get shot or killed the shooter may walk because self defense???
 
Bow to Royalty said:
You have a habit of talking on things you don't know about instead of just sitting it out, or educating yourself before giving an opinion.

You're saying it's not self defense because nobody had a weapon. It's obvious you dunno the details of what happened. Sit it out or get informed.
Click to expand...
I hope you don't feel vindicated tho

This case was a farce from day 1
 
Race Jones said:
he killed two people and there was enough evidence to put him under.

end of story

lmao @ yall too emotional. he killed two people and harmed someone else tf???
Click to expand...
A black father killed an unarmed white teen who he said was at his driveway saying racist things and threatened to harm his son. He was found not guilty too. Now if this was a blm protestor who shot Kyle how would you feel even if Kyle was unarmed? Fuck Kyle btw but would you feel the same if it was the opposite. Remove your bias as it has no bearing on the reality
 
Also for the record I don't give a shit about this Kyle dude walking or not. The Aubrey case is more important to me. We all knew day one when the judge threw out most of the damning evidence against Kyle that this clown was going to walk.
 
Bow to Royalty said:
You have a habit of talking on things you don't know about instead of just sitting it out, or educating yourself before giving an opinion.

You're saying it's not self defense because nobody had a weapon. It's obvious you dunno the details of what happened. Sit it out or get informed.
Click to expand...

man nigga stfu. it is you that stays talking out their ass, this thread is proof

youre just cooning per usual

the two ppl that died had no gun. a skateboard vs an AR isnt even worth debating.
 
Old Man Cain said:
Because that gentleman just saw an active shooter kill two people.

Also If this the new norm then when God forbid an active shooter is ever in your area and you're fully strapped and try to save the day and you get shot or killed the shooter may walk because self defense???
Click to expand...
That dumbass should have shot him then. Then this whole situation would have been resolved a different way
 
VulcanRaven said:
If the bold is true then the prosecutor failed to do his job and could have motioned to get the judge removed. Its a white system and it failed white people. As for someone shooting protestors, that can happen anytime just like the church shootings so people were mot safe before but protesting has not yielded any resorts and its past time to attack the system in a different way. That is a differect topic though
Click to expand...

The 3rd guy ran up on him gun in hand, and testified in court that Rittenhouse didn't shoot him until after he aimed his gun at him.

That's why you can't talk to people in here man, haha. It's on video AND the guy himself is in court saying he ran up on him gun in hand.... people still want to believe something different though.
 
Old Man Cain said:
Because that gentleman just saw an active shooter kill two people.

Also If this the new norm then when God forbid an active shooter is ever in your area and you're fully strapped and try to save the day and you get shot or killed the shooter may walk because self defense???
Click to expand...
I get what you’re saying, but from a legal standpoint if the first shooting that started everything was in self defense, it’s gonna be hard to justifiably convict subsequent shooting when they chased him.

It was a very chaotic situation. A mob of people even beat the shit out of a journalist who was trying to help the first dude that got shot.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top