Welcome To aBlackWeb

Village Idiot of the Week 8/8

VIOTW


  • Total voters
    41
  • Poll closed .

Chicity

I'm what the culture feeling
Site Administrator
5 Grand for this stupid hot take

A woman should never, ever, ever be able to sue somebody that raped her. It's common sense. A girl can sit in a bar on Wall Street. Wait for a guy to pick her up, go back to the hotel, or his apartment, have sex. And then claim he raped her and then sue him for everything he's got. If you could sue somebody for rape, every bar on Wall Street would be filled with gold diggers.

But the perpetrator should go to prison if he's found guilty. That way the woman really has nothing to gain by falsely accusing somebody.

No woman is going to go through a trial, take the witness stand, get bombarded with questions by the defense attorney and have her name dragged through the mud if there's nothing in it for her. But if the end result is the guy going to prison, it would make sense.

If I was on a jury and a girl was suing a millionaire for raping her I wouldn't believe a word she said on the witness stand.


Couple other contenders in this thread but that take took the cake
 
5 Grand for this stupid hot take




Couple other contenders in this thread but that take took the cake


So you think a girl should be able to sit at a bar on Wall Street, meet a guy, go back to his place, have sex, and then accuse him of rape and sue him for millions of dollars?

You're the idiot of the week if you think women should be allowed to do that.
 
Can we just accept this first entry, since surely nothing will top this.
Not so fast, my friend. 5 could possibly beat himself before the deadline. Has Supa jumped out the window this week yet? And then you have your surprise contenders every week.
Hadn't even considered this, B. Salute.
This is actually progressive for him since he thinks all women are just waiting on some random nigga to fuck them in the ass, pussy and mouth. The only prerequisite of course being that he take a shower.

This is a very simple concept.

If you could falsely accuse somebody of rape for monetary gain, more women would do it.

But if there is zero possibility of monetary gain, then there would be no incentive to falsely accuse somebody of rape.

Now @Chicity let's hear your opposing viewpoint.
 
This is a very simple concept.

If you could falsely accuse somebody of rape for monetary gain, more women would do it.

But if there is zero possibility of monetary gain, then there would be no incentive to falsely accuse somebody of rape.

Now @Chicity let's hear your opposing viewpoint.
I'm just here to dance my man

tenor (12).gif
 
So you think a girl should be able to sit at a bar on Wall Street, meet a guy, go back to his place, have sex, and then accuse him of rape and sue him for millions of dollars?

You're the idiot of the week if you think women should be allowed to do that.

so that’s you’re only example of rape? You think that’s common?
 
So you think a girl should be able to sit at a bar on Wall Street, meet a guy, go back to his place, have sex, and then accuse him of rape and sue him for millions of dollars?

You're the idiot of the week if you think women should be allowed to do that.

Not only should women be allowed to do this, the case shouldnt even go to court and the women doing this should be given all of the guys money and properties and 90% of his future earnings.
 
Not only should women be allowed to do this, the case shouldnt even go to court and the women doing this should be given all of the guys money and properties and 90% of his future earnings.
Wait what, are y'all understanding what he's getting at. He's saying fake rape allegations
 
“Victims do not typically receive compensation from the assailant unless there is the potential of recovery in the form of professional malpractice or homeowners,” Colleen said.



Civil Claims and Damages Based on Sexual Assault
Even though a sexual assault incident can give rise to a criminal prosecution—which can result in jail time, fines, probation, and other sanctions against the offender if a conviction is obtained—a civil lawsuit is usually the only way a sexual assault victim can get monetary compensation (called "damages" in legalese) for harm suffered.

The amount and type of compensation that is available in a civil lawsuit over sexual abuse will depend on the specific facts of the case, and the legal theory on which the personal injury lawsuit is based (a legal theory is called a "cause of action" in this context). Since there is no cause of action called "sexual assault" in civil law, you’ll need to choose another legal theory under which to hold the perpetrator liable—which probably means personal injury causes of action like civil assault/battery and intentional infliction of emotional distress.




There is a class of civil lawsuits that cover intentionally inflicted injuries, both physical and mental. Intentional tort claims seek to compensate the victims of purposeful harm. While there is no specific civil claim for rape, there are several intentional torts that may apply in a rape case, depending on the circumstances:

  • Assault: If the rapist intended to and cause the victim apprehension of harmful or offensive contact.
  • Battery: If the rapist intentionally caused non-consensual contact (some jurisdictions allow claims for sexual battery).
  • False Imprisonment: If the rapist restrained the victim against his or her will.
  • Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress: If the rapist's extreme and outrageous conduct caused the victim severe emotional distress and/or bodily harm.
Any one of these claims, if successful, could secure damages for a rape victim. The exact amount of damages would depend on the particular facts in each case.


 
“Victims do not typically receive compensation from the assailant unless there is the potential of recovery in the form of professional malpractice or homeowners,” Colleen said.



Civil Claims and Damages Based on Sexual Assault
Even though a sexual assault incident can give rise to a criminal prosecution—which can result in jail time, fines, probation, and other sanctions against the offender if a conviction is obtained—a civil lawsuit is usually the only way a sexual assault victim can get monetary compensation (called "damages" in legalese) for harm suffered.

The amount and type of compensation that is available in a civil lawsuit over sexual abuse will depend on the specific facts of the case, and the legal theory on which the personal injury lawsuit is based (a legal theory is called a "cause of action" in this context). Since there is no cause of action called "sexual assault" in civil law, you’ll need to choose another legal theory under which to hold the perpetrator liable—which probably means personal injury causes of action like civil assault/battery and intentional infliction of emotional distress.




There is a class of civil lawsuits that cover intentionally inflicted injuries, both physical and mental. Intentional tort claims seek to compensate the victims of purposeful harm. While there is no specific civil claim for rape, there are several intentional torts that may apply in a rape case, depending on the circumstances:

  • Assault: If the rapist intended to and cause the victim apprehension of harmful or offensive contact.
  • Battery: If the rapist intentionally caused non-consensual contact (some jurisdictions allow claims for sexual battery).
  • False Imprisonment: If the rapist restrained the victim against his or her will.
  • Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress: If the rapist's extreme and outrageous conduct caused the victim severe emotional distress and/or bodily harm.
Any one of these claims, if successful, could secure damages for a rape victim. The exact amount of damages would depend on the particular facts in each case.



I'm starting to question whether you understand your own stance after this post.
 
Back
Top