Welcome To aBlackWeb

COMMUNITY ABW Oversight Commission

Status
Not open for further replies.
Not gonna front G...I’m not wasting y’all time I was just tryin’ to add a little in sight...I’m a classic slacker and I wouldn’t do right bro....I’ve been mainly just trying to stay around tha music threads recently...just thought I had summin’ that might help a little...I’m sure it’s plenty of posters who will do some actual contributions to this subject tho

It's all good my g.
 
That's not the environment here.
But it really is. You can't force someone to not clown you. That's the point. People hide behind online aliases and avatars. You want real-life respect from an online forum. Not gonna happen. Understand that and you can avoid getting in your feelings. Some of you are too easily triggered.

Some peeps enjoy watching the world burn. A troll is what they are called online. A heckler is what they are called at sporting events and other gatherings. This is no different.

Learn to laugh at yourself first and your life will be so much better instead of letting some random online poster get to you in real life.
 
Not once has it been asked in this thread to get rid of any staff. Have you even read what I proposed or are you just dismissing me off the rip?

Again no one asked to reveal any numbers or formulas. I proposed if a mod acts to edit a post, account or punish a poster it be made clear which mod it was with some kind of footprint so a claim can be levied. Otherwise what's the point.

I dont see how this is over reaching. Folk can't want to moderate but hide their hands.

I was thinking of your other post about after a certain amount of strikes a mod will be reduced to jr mod and then ultimately removed. If that's not what this is then I apologize.


I'm cool with putting out site wide alerts anytime a member is banned. Same with a mod altering a member's acct without his/her permission.


As far as mass alerts being sent out when posts are edited, that's not likely. There's too many spammers in the candy shop alone to keep up with that.
 
At the end of the day tho, this whole thread is about how the mods need to be checked, when it's the non mods who get out of pocket the most on here. Where's the thread for that at?

It just seems like an agenda cuz a handful of yall don't fuck with the mods.


People rarely get banned on here, that shit chicity pulled yesterday rarely happens and that shit lasted for a whole 60 secs.


Cut it out man.
 
Homie, we have contests where people post selfies in their profile pic to win money. There's a thread for pictures and a thread for posters to post their kids.

No poster gives a fuck about getting roasted, but kids always been off lines.

You late to the party, but must of us have come from more hostile online communities... And thrived well there. Tough skin isn't the issue here. The issue here is a healthy posting environment.

People want to feel safe posting here, and the people are questioning the moderators ability to provide that environment without forcing their personal biases on posters without reason.

But trust and believe.... We posting pictures.
 
Nah, I'm still catching up in the thread.


@Goldie ?? said if it's gonna happen........he's gonna be the one to choose who's on it.......so, nobody really has a spot in anything at this point.

Nah I was talking about the staff, not the "Oversight commission"
 
I was thinking of your other post about after a certain amount of strikes a mod will be reduced to jr mod and then ultimately removed. If that's not what this is then I apologize.


I'm cool with putting out site wide alerts anytime a member is banned. Same with a mod altering a member's acct without his/her permission.


As far as mass alerts being sent out when posts are edited, that's not likely. There's too many spammers in the candy shop alone to keep up with that.

You didn't read that post properly either cause I didn't suggest they get removed since you had already taken that off the table I suggested the powers they abuse and ultimately get their privileges suspended be removed if it even gets that far.

Again I didn't ask for a mass alert to be sent out when a post gets edited I'm certain a mod can leave "post edited by..." in a post. I asked that when someone gets banned a site wide alert goes out telling us which mod has banned a user.
If they alter an account only the user of that account should be alerted.
 
You didn't read that post properly either cause I didn't suggest they get removed since you had already taken that off the table I suggested the powers they abuse and get ultimately get their privileges suspended be removed if it even gets that far.

Again I didn't ask for a mass alert to be sent out when a post gets edited I'm certain a mod can leave "post edited by..." in a post. I asked that when someone gets banned a site wide alert goes out telling us which mod has banned a user.
If they alter an account only the user of that account should be alerted.

Then we're on the same page. I'm cool with it, if the mods are.
 
But it's YOUR Mods whose actions are being questioned. Instead of listening to your constituents, you refer to the insane black hole known as Reddit. Hey bro, it's your site. Your Mods as a whole lack credibility. Don't be tone deaf, and don't silence or ban me because I don't agree with you.

My fault, i don't think I made myself clear, idgaf what you're talkin about fam. Nothing you say will ever make me change my staff. If you don't like it, go to a different site.


This site is a million times more lenient and chill than REddit, LSA, Cracka Coli, etc. If you can't handle it here, you just aint built for forums.
 
I'll throw my name in ?‍♂️
I was thinking of your other post about after a certain amount of strikes a mod will be reduced to jr mod and then ultimately removed. If that's not what this is then I apologize.


I'm cool with putting out site wide alerts anytime a member is banned. Same with a mod altering a member's acct without his/her permission.


As far as mass alerts being sent out when posts are edited, that's not likely. There's too many spammers in the candy shop alone to keep up with that.
I don't think sitewide alerts are needed because a bunch of people don't even go to other parts of the site so they really don't care. Maybe just post in the thread and say why it happened and move on. If someone asks more questions then answer them. If it's too many questions or too personal then take it outside the thread and PM them
Same could be done for edits
 
Not once has it been asked in this thread to get rid of any staff. Have you even read what I proposed or are you just dismissing me off the rip?

Again no one asked to reveal any numbers or formulas. I proposed if a mod acts to edit a post, account or punish a poster it be made clear which mod it was with some kind of footprint so a claim can be levied. Otherwise what's the point.

I dont see how this is over reaching. Folk can't want to moderate but hide their hands.
They don't want to listen bro. In their feelings. Like the blue line of the police force. Want to arrest and cite people but don't want to be recorded. And they wonder why they are being questioned. Anyways, I'm eating caramel-coated popcorn enjoying the festvities. Ya'll keep partying like it's 1999!
 
At the end of the day tho, this whole thread is about how the mods need to be checked, when it's the non mods who get out of pocket the most on here. Where's the thread for that at?

It just seems like an agenda cuz a handful of yall don't fuck with the mods.


People rarely get banned on here, that shit chicity pulled yesterday rarely happens and that shit lasted for a whole 60 secs.


Cut it out man.
You guys keep saying this in and then dismiss the issue every time which then makes it so nothing ever gets solved

that’s not what this is
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top