Welcome To aBlackWeb

The Official World Politics Thread

You should care that she said M&Ms instead of Skittles. That fact that she fucked that up makes her whole point hollow and empty. Don't fall for frauds. Especially white politicians who try to put on for black people. She doesn't give a fuck about Eric Garner's killer. She tried to use the deaths of other young black men as a tool to attack a political opponent an d she fucked that up. She'd be better off not saying anything at all. So while she may win some cool points for people who want to see justice for Eric Garner imagine how Trayvon's parents feel right now? I'd be pissed off if she mistakenly used my son to score political points.

Are you implying that she doesn't care what happened to Trayvon because she screwed up on what candy he was carrying? Since when did we make accuracy on minor details of an event the primary consideration regarding a person's sincerity in caring about that event?
 
Yea thats fundsmentally stupid...

I caught the read early in the debate they were trying to force a face off and manufacture a W forb Biden

Castro and Booker still came out on top.. the post mortemn for Biden was he didnt die in surgery he fought back.. there were times where i thought where the hell is kamala wasnt her greatest night but she still was the 3rd best candidate that night


None of these candidates can compete with Elizabeth Warren where it should matter incant wait til they thin the heard theybwill probably milk it and drop 4 or 6 though
 
We should also put that blonde chick somewhere in the cabinet.

She gets racial issues more than most black politicians do. And she is very progressive.
 
Bruh don't fall for that bullshit that Gillibrand was saying. She's HRC lite. She also insinuated that Trayvon Martin had M&Ms instead of Skittles. Now that may not seem like a big deal to some but it's little shit like that, that makes these politicians look fake and foolish. How do you fuck that up? How do you say that he had M&Ms instead of Skittles? I'll tell you how. You rehearse a response and answer about something that you don't truly care about.

I bet if you put up a pole on this site right now and asked every single member of ABW what candy Trayvon Martin had on him 100% of the people would say Skittles. So how does a Presidential Candidate who's literally had time to rehearse that fuck it up?


Really bruh?
 
Media really gotta stop pushing Biden to be the presumptive nominee at this point...




I'd say Warren as president with Booker as the VP at this point would be better IMO
They wont stop it.. he embodies "can beat trump" he makes whites comfortable no mater what demographic group they fall in.. imma need yall to grab your aunties and uncles stand in front of the church and give them the word foreal... and thats not even accounting for the other shit.. black people could sink his campaign but i fear they will vote with his association in mind
 
Last edited:
Media really gotta stop pushing Biden to be the presumptive nominee at this point...




I'd say Warren as president with Booker as the VP at this point would be better IMO


Booker is a Corporate Democrat, is funded by large donors (who he has to pay back with pro-corporate policies), and he doesn’t want Medicare-for-All.

He isn’t progressive enough, period.

He also wouldn’t be a fighter against Trump or Pence in a debate.

Bernie would take their heads off in a debate.
 
They wont stop it.. he embodies "can beat trump" he makes whites comfortable no mater what demographic group they fall in.. imma need yall to grab tour aunties and uncles stand in front of the church and give them the word foreal... and thats not even accounting for the other shit.. black people could sink his campaign but i fear they will vote with his association in mind

Black people especially black women are virtually the sole reason why he is polling so high.

He is destroying the other candidates with the black vote.

Half think they are being pragmatists, half don’t pay attention and know him off of name recognition and association with Obama.
 
Booker is a Corporate Democrat, is funded by large donors (who he has to pay back with pro-corporate policies), and he doesn’t want Medicare-for-All.

He isn’t progressive enough, period.

He also wouldn’t be a fighter against Trump or Pence in a debate.

Bernie would take their heads off in a debate.

How is Booker more corporate than a lot of the other folks running as Dems?

I'm not familiar enough with Bookers record to argue his case... but I think a Warren/Sanders ticket may be a lil too progressive to get elected.

Would be dope if it happened.. but folks tend to vote against their interests way too often for me to feel comfortable of Warren/Sanders winning in the current state of things
 
Back
Top