Chill with the insult my guy not all white ppl watch fox news.#1 You watching Fox News ... that’s your first problem.
#2 Follow the logic.
What do you think would happen if Muller formally determined that the President indeed committed a crime ... and then turned around and failed to indict him per the explicit policy of the organization that employed him?
The President would have his name smeared with no due process ... no recourse to formally litigate or refute the claims made against him.
A fate that breaches his constitutional rights.
Why?
Because he is serving as the sitting President of the United States. He can’t go to court and wait out a 3 year trial.
So if it isn’t Muller’s job to determine if the President committed a crime, and should be removed from office; whose job is it?
The answer is - Congress.
And the Impeachment Process.
Its a legit question i didnt read the report and im not so 'politically inclined'.
To me it sounded like contradiction, i dont refute that trump broke laws.
The hearing also seemed to me like nothing will come of it. It seemed pointless.
Which leads to my next question. What leads ppl to believe there is a higher chance for impeachment after the hearing than before?
And btw i dont have twitter. Most of trumps tweets i read actually come from this thread.