Welcome To aBlackWeb

Register

The Official World Politics Thread

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/ei...k-trump-vote-for-bill-to-reopen-govt-agencies

Dems Will Force Republicans To Make Difficult Votes On Drug Cost Legislation

WASHINGTON (AP) — Challenging the Trump administration on a high-profile consumer issue, leading congressional liberals plan to unveil a package of bills Thursday designed to radically reduce what Americans pay for prescription drugs by linking prices to lower costs in other countries.


The legislation has little chance of becoming law under a divided government, but it could put Republicans on the defensive by echoing themes and ideas that President Donald Trump has embraced at one time or another. The common denominator: Americans shouldn’t have to pay more for critical medications than consumers pay in other economically advanced countries.

The Trump administration has put forward its own plan for reducing drug prices.

Independent Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont and Democratic Rep. Elijah Cummings of Maryland plan to introduce the three bills on Thursday, according to the senator’s office. Cummings chairs the House Oversight and Government Reform committee, which is planning to take a major role on drug pricing issues.

A new idea in the package would open up generic competition to patent-protected U.S. brand-name drugs that are deemed “excessively priced.” A second bill would allow Medicare to directly negotiate with drugmakers. The third bill would allow consumers to import lower-priced medications from Canada.

“If the pharmaceutical industry will not end its greed … then we will end it for them,” Sanders said in a statement.

The federal Health and Human Services Department would get a major new mission regulating drug prices.

As a presidential candidate, Trump initially called for Medicare to negotiate drug prices and favored allowing Americans to import lower-priced medications from abroad, something that many consumers already do even if it is not legal.

But those ideas are political nonstarters for most Republicans, who favor a free-market approach to the U.S. pharmaceutical industry and prize its capacity for innovation.

As president, Trump has unveiled a complex plan to lower drug costs, relying on dozens of regulatory actions. A key goal is to eliminate incentives for major actors like drugmakers, pharmacy managers and insurers to stifle competition at the expense of consumers. Independent experts say the administration’s proposals would have an impact but they don’t limit the ability of drug companies to set high prices.

Time and again, Trump has complained that other countries where governments set drug prices are taking advantage of Americans. Indeed, one of his ideas would shift Medicare payments for drugs administered in doctors’ offices to a level based on international prices.

“We are taking aim at the global freeloading that forces American consumers to subsidize lower prices in foreign countries through higher prices in our country,” the president said in unveiling that proposal shortly before last year’s congressional elections.

Sanders and Cummings would go far beyond Trump’s proposals. Their legislation would essentially apply to any U.S. patent-protected brand-name drug, whether or not government programs are bearing its costs. By comparison, Trump’s international pricing proposal would not apply to retail pharmacy drugs purchased by Medicare beneficiaries or to medications for privately insured people.

Under the lawmakers’ plan, drugs deemed “excessively priced” by HHS could face generic competition. A medication’s cost would be deemed “excessive” if its price in the U.S. is higher than the median, or midpoint, price in Canada, the United Kingdom, Germany, France and Japan.

If the manufacturer is unwilling to cut its U.S. price, then the government could allow generic manufacturers to make a more affordable version of the medication. Generic companies taking on the task would have to pay “reasonable” royalties to the company holding the patent.

The pharmaceutical industry is already adamantly opposed to Trump’s international pricing idea and is likely to fight the lawmakers’ proposal even harder.
Click to expand...
 
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/trump-dodges-manafort-question

Trump On Manafort Sharing Polling: ‘I Didn’t Know Anything About That’


President Donald Trump said it was news to him that his former campaign chairman Paul Manafort was sharing campaign polling data with a Russian associate during the 2016 campaign.

“I didn’t know anything about that,” he said Thursday to assembled reporters before leaving for his border trip.
Click to expand...

 
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/steve-king-wants-know-why-white-supremacy-offensive

Steve King Wants To Know Why The Term ‘White Supremacist’ Is Offensive

In true form, Rep. Steve King (R-IA), who barely squeezed out a win in his latest reelection bid after he lost several corporate donors over his chumminess with neo-Nazis, has a burning question: Why is white supremacy offensive?

In a New York Times article on King’s penchant for spouting demonizing rhetoric about immigrants, King himself told the newspaper that he doesn’t understand when “that language” became “offensive.”

“White nationalist, white supremacist, Western civilization — how did that language become offensive?” King told the Times. “Why did I sit in classes teaching me about the merits of our history and our civilization?”

King also told the Times that he’s not racist and said he believes immigrant assimilation is more important than race because he values the “culture of America,” which is “based on values brought to the United States by whites from Europe,” in the Times words.

The comments add to a long, running list of racist and offensive remarks made by the congressman throughout his political career.
Click to expand...

0EBAAEE1-7AA9-4456-AA9D-DB69EF0F236A.gif
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top