Welcome To aBlackWeb

The Official World Politics Thread

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/ivanka-trump-email-congressional-probe

House Dems Plan To Resume Ivanka Trump Email Probe Dropped By GOPers

WASHINGTON (AP) — New revelations about the extent of Ivanka Trump’s personal email use in the White House will be getting a hard look from House Democrats when they take power in January.

The House Oversight and Government Reform committee began looking into private email use last year after reports by Politico revealed that Ivanka Trump’s husband, Jared Kushner, and other White House officials had been using private email for government purposes in possible violation of the Presidential Records Act and other federal record-keeping laws.

Rep. Elijah Cummings of Maryland, the likely incoming chairman of the Oversight panel, said Tuesday that he will resume that bipartisan investigation, which was dropped by Republicans. And he will pressure President Donald Trump’s administration to turn over records about the use of private email for public business by Ivanka Trump, Kushner and other senior officials.

“My goal is to prevent this from happening again — not to turn this into a spectacle the way Republicans went after Hillary Clinton,” Cummings said. “My main priority as Chairman will be to focus on the issues that impact Americans in their everyday lives.”

The issue resurfaced this week when The Washington Post reported that the president’s daughter, while a top White House adviser, sent hundreds of emails about government business from a personal email account last year. The emails were sent to White House aides, Cabinet members and Ivanka Trump’s assistants, many in violation of public records rules, according to The Post.

In comments to reporters, the president, who has spent years railing against Clinton’s use of private email for public business while secretary of state, sought to downplay — and differentiate — his daughter’s email use from his former opponent’s.

“They aren’t classified like Hillary Clinton. They weren’t deleted like Hillary Clinton,” Trump said, adding: “What Ivanka did, it’s all in the presidential records. Everything is there.”

A spokesman for Ivanka Trump’s lawyer, Abbe Lowell, didn’t dispute the Post report. The spokesman, Peter Mirijanian, said no classified information was transmitted in the messages, no emails were deleted and the emails have since been “retained” in conformity with records laws. He also said Ivanka Trump did not set up a private server for the account, which he said was “never transferred or housed at Trump Organization.”

Mirijanian said that while transitioning into the government, Ivanka Trump “sometimes used her private account, almost always for logistics and scheduling concerning her family.”

“When concerns were raised in the press 14 months ago, Ms. Trump reviewed and verified her email use with White House Counsel and explained the issue to congressional leaders,” he said. He did not say which congressional leaders were briefed.

On Tuesday, Republican Rep. Mark Meadows of North Carolina, a fierce defender of the president as the leader of the House Freedom Caucus, also downplayed the matter.

“There are over 30,000 BleachBit reasons why the Hillary Clinton email scandal isn’t even close to the Ivanka email issue,” Meadows tweeted, referring to a computer program used to delete emails from her server.

The House Oversight investigation into private email used by Trump White House officials was launched in early 2017 with the support of then-Republican chairman Rep. Jason Chaffetz. After Chaffetz retired from Congress, Rep. Trey Gowdy of South Carolina joined with Cummings in demanding that the White House provide the identities of staff members who had used their personal emails to conduct official business.

In October 2017, the White House dispatched counsel’s office lawyers Stefan Passantino, Uttam Dhillon and Daniel Epstein to brief bipartisan committee staff, but the attorneys refused to identify any officials who had used private email for official business. The lawyers only said that several White House employees had “confessed” to failing to following the Presidential Records Act, according to a letter summarizing the briefing released by Cummings earlier this year.

The White House lawyers said they couldn’t provide additional information on specific employees while an internal review was under way, according to the letter.

But the White House lawyers said they would share the findings of the internal review with the committee once it concluded, according to a separate letter sent to the White House by Gowdy.

Cummings has said the committee never received that information, and Democrats have said Gowdy dropped the issue and never followed up.

The discovery of the extent of Ivanka Trump’s email use was prompted by public records requests from the liberal watchdog group American Oversight. The group’s executive director, Austin Evers, said in a statement that “The president’s family is not above the law,” and he called on Congress to investigate.

“For more than two years, President Trump and senior leaders in Congress have made it very clear that they view the use of personal email servers for government business to be a serious offense that demands investigation and even prosecution, and we expect the same standard will be applied in this case,” he said.

The emails the group uncovered include correspondence between Ivanka Trump and Small Business Administration chief Linda McMahon and Education Secretary Betsy DeVos.

GettyImages-979521656-804x537@2x.jpg
 

So I guess he told Saudi Arabia, I'll let this killing slide as long as you get your OPEC buddies to lower the oil prices? Basically saying the USA can be bought for the right price.

The timing of everything definitely leads to this conclusion.

This is the negotiation tactic of a man with no morals.
 
So I guess he told Saudi Arabia, I'll let this killing slide as long as you get your OPEC buddies to lower the oil prices? Basically saying the USA can be bought for the right price.

The timing of everything definitely leads to this conclusion.

This is the negotiation tactic of a man COUNTRY THAT NEVER HAD morals.
 
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/obama-compares-beto-to-himself-calls-him-an-impressive-young-man

Obama Compares Beto To Himself, Calls Him An ‘Impressive Young Man’

President Barack Obama seems to agree with the frequently voiced observation that Rep. Beto O’Rourke (D-TX) is cut from the same cloth as he is, comparing their campaign styles and the authenticity that helped both men resonate with so many constituents.

O’Rourke is an “impressive young man who ran a terrific race in Texas,” Obama said on a live taping of David Axelrod’s podcast, “The Axe Files.” “What I liked most about his race was that it didn’t feel constantly poll-tested. It felt as if he based his statements and his positions on what he believed. And that, you’d like to think, is normally how things work. Sadly it’s not.”

“The reason I was able to make a connection with a sizable portion of the country was because people had a sense that I said what I meant,” Obama continued. “And that’s a quality that, as I look at what I’m sure will be a strong field of candidates in 2020, many of whom are friends of mine and whom I deeply respect. What I oftentimes am looking for first and foremost is, do you seem to mean it? Are you in this thing cause you have a strong set of convictions that you are willing to risk things for?”

He said that O’Rourke fit this description, as do “a number of people who are thinking about this race.”

Top Democratic staffers and donors will likely take note of Obama’s statements, many of whom are putting their 2020 plans on hold until the Texan congressman announces his intentions.
 


I know someone who came to the US from Senegal illegally because of political persecution. He almost got deported under Dubya (I think Ashcroft was the AG at the time) and they ruled in Federal court that him entering the country illegally didn't contradict his need for asylum.

I saw Trump say that nonsense and immediately thought of the homie. His case is online for anyone who wants more background on the issue:

https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/384/743/483806/
 
https://www.mediaite.com/online/rog...reportedly-in-plea-negotiations-with-mueller/

Roger Stone Ally Jerome Corsi Reportedly in Plea Negotiations With Mueller


Jerome Corsi, conspiracy theorist and ally of Roger Stone, is reportedly in plea negotiations with the special counsel’s office.

Per the Washington Post:

Conservative writer and conspiracy theorist Jerome Corsi is in plea negotiations with special counsel Robert S. Mueller III, according to a person with knowledge of the talks.

The talks with Corsi — an associate of both President Trump and GOP operative Roger Stone — could bring Mueller’s team closer to determining whether Trump or his advisers were linked to WikiLeaks’ release of hacked Democratic emails in 2016, a key part of his long-running inquiry.

Corsi was subpoenaed by Robert Mueller‘s office back in September as the investigation continued, with Stone reportedly under particular scrutiny.

Last week Corsi claimed that he expects to be indicted by Mueller for perjury, and subsequently bailed on an interview with NBC after his lawyer’s call with the special counsel’s office.

Corsi is an infamous conspiracy-monger and was notably one of the people most pushing the birther nonsense against former President Barack Obama.
 
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/how-pelosi-used-her-legislative-savvy-to-quell-a-rebllion

How Pelosi Kept Her Head Down And Used Her Political Savvy To Quell A Rebellion

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi has quietly taken the legs out from under the brewing insurrection in the House, looking more than likely now than ever to get the gavel.

According to a Thursday Washington Post report, Pelosi dealt with the rebellion in her usual way: dismissing breathless reports of her inevitable demise, and approaching the disgruntled members one by one to hear them out and strike a compromise.

“She’s doesn’t raise her voice; she doesn’t threaten anybody — that’s not her style,” Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA) told the Washington Post. “She wins by winning the moral argument, by winning the public-relations argument, by winning the argument with groups and activists. She’s going to be speaker.”

In rapid succession, Pelosi has deftly maneuvered challengers and opponents onto her side.

First, Pelosi got Rep. Marcia Fudge (D-OH), a possible challenger, to drop the idea by slotting her in the chairmanship of a subcomittee on voting rights. Then, she convinced Rep. Brian Higgins (D-NY), a member who signed the letter calling for a new speaker, to retract his statement and throw her his support after listening to his desire to see Medicare expanded.

Pelosi’s not quite out of the woods yet, but the tide has clearly turned with most of the Congressional Black Caucus rallying to her side, along with former President Barack Obama and progressive influencer Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY).
 
Back
Top