The official COVID-19/Coronavirus Discussion Thread...aka I hope I don't get the Rona

Mr.LV said:
Click to expand...

Tweet is true but misleading. 34 on unpaid leave, thousands allowed to work while their exemptions are reviewed.

Screenshot_20211101-182639.png
Screenshot_20211101-182731.png


Thousands still haven't got the jab. 34 just didn't file an exemption and instead outright rejected the mandate.

Though they expect when those thousands run out of options the majority will stop fighting and get jabbed anyway.


Read the article!
 
ChicagoFigure said:
Tweet is true but misleading. 34 on unpaid leave, thousands allowed to work while their exemptions are reviewed.

View attachment 684541View attachment 684542

Thousands still haven't got the jab. 34 just didn't file an exemption and instead outright rejected the mandate.

Though they expect when those thousands run out of options the majority will stop fighting and get jabbed anyway.


Read the article!
Click to expand...
E3F888E0-93AF-4775-BD3E-E27D558AD22B.gif
 
Look how they report this shit...
Screenshot_20211102-202628.png



U would think there's some real info in here to dispel the theory....

Screenshot_20211102-202723.png


Notice how headline states lack of support ONLY for lab leak theory...then passively acknowledges there's no support for natural origin either yet downplays that fact then continues to hammer at no lab leak support again:

Screenshot_20211102-202932.png





Compare that to Reuters and China's reaction to the same report LA Times is referring to....

www.reuters.com

China says U.S. COVID origins report is without credibility

A declassified U.S. intelligence report saying it was plausible that the COVID-19 pandemic originated in a laboratory is unscientific and has no credibility, Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Wang Wenbin said in a statement on Sunday.
www.reuters.com www.reuters.com
Screenshot_20211102-203148.png
Screenshot_20211102-203232.png





So the actual report says "lab leak is plausible"
LA Times says "farewell to lab leak theory" and made sure to throw politics at the end of the article. That's not journalism...


:hahaha:
 
www.google.com

Clinical trials of Pfizer COVID-19 jab flawed and doctored up, says The BMJ journal

The vaccines, developed by Pfizer and Moderna, are special fat nanoparticles that contain a fragment of the COVID-19 RNA
www.google.com www.google.com
Screenshot_20211103-220603.png
Screenshot_20211103-220643.png



The BMJ article:
www.bmj.com

Covid-19: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer’s vaccine trial

Revelations of poor practices at a contract research company helping to carry out Pfizer’s pivotal covid-19 vaccine trial raise questions about data integrity and regulatory oversight. Paul D Thacker reports In autumn 2020 Pfizer’s chairman and chief executive, Albert Bourla, released an open...
www.bmj.com www.bmj.com
Screenshot_20211103-220332.png

Screenshot_20211103-220034.png
Screenshot_20211103-220106.png
Screenshot_20211103-220146.png
Screenshot_20211103-220238.png
Screenshot_20211103-220305.png


www.google.com

Fact check: Report questioning Pfizer trial shouldn’t undermine confidence in vaccines

The story published this week in the British Medical Journal lays out issues raised by a now-former employee of Ventavia Research Group, one of the companies contracted to help run some of Pfizer’s…
www.google.com www.google.com
Screenshot_20211103-220917.png
Screenshot_20211103-220939.png




5d6ff152cb3c7d31213de07185ca3730.gif
 
ChicagoFigure said:
www.businessinsider.com

A new pill designed to treat active COVID-19 infections was just approved by the UK, the first country to do so

Early trial results found that Merck's molnupiravir, the first antiviral designed to treat COVID-19, reduced hospitalizations by as much as 50%.
www.businessinsider.com www.businessinsider.com
View attachment 686899
Click to expand...
I’ll be glad when we get a treatment approved here too. Then maybe we can at least put the divisiveness about the vaccine behind us and get on to the next divisive thing, lol.
 


Fauci still denying Gain of function: "It doesn't meet the definition".

theintercept.com

NIH Officials Worked With EcoHealth Alliance to Evade Restrictions on Coronavirus Experiments

Emails show that NIH officials allowed EcoHealth Alliance to craft oversight language governing its own gain-of-function research.
theintercept.com theintercept.com
Screenshot_20211104-112020.png

Screenshot_20211104-112135.png
Screenshot_20211104-112208.png
Screenshot_20211104-112249.png
Screenshot_20211104-112315.png
Screenshot_20211104-112445.png
Screenshot_20211104-112711.png
Screenshot_20211104-112827.png
Screenshot_20211104-113006.png
Summary:
NIH: Hey man this looks like gain of function what do u have to say about this?
Dazsak: Tell u what, if this turns out to be gain of function, we'll notify u immediately if the viral load of our samples growth x10 and stop the study.
NIH: Good enough for us *changes gain of function definition*
In the lab: *viral growth exceeds x10,000*
Daszak: 🤫
NIH:
84eb5f65f5e60b0ec243f590dd00510d_w200.gif
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top