Welcome To aBlackWeb

The official COVID-19/Coronavirus Discussion Thread...aka I hope I don't get the Rona

All the CDC ever said is it's not approved for use for Covid because there isn't enough data. It literally takes a neutral stance.
Yet from the get go I said it’s not enough data and how’d that go?

this whole thing is not about what people think it is. The narrative keeps changing depending on where a person stands.
 
Yes, let’s play percentages. Tell me the number of people dying from the vaccine itself as a percentage of those who got the vaccine vs. the people that died from ivermectin use itself as a percentage of those that took it. This is the safe part.

Also, tell me the number of vaccinated people that caught Covid and were hospitalized or worse as a percentage of all vaxxed vs. the number of people who caught Covid and were hospitalized or worse as a percentage of all those who took ivermectin. This is the effective part.

But for the record, these are the kind of posts where people would dispute with you and you’d claim we’re attacking you for personal medical reasons for not getting the vaccine.
I’ll gather all that info in a bit.

tired of you.

drinks still on me next time in Munich.
But online it’s time for you to catch these e-hands
 
This post shows me what media is doing is working.

People aren't dying from ivermectin. Most of those stories are people who died OF COVID regardless of ivermectin self medication (the wrong ivermectin).

The people that are being poisoned are from livestock ivermectin. Human ivermectin is literally one of the safest drugs and isn't poisoning anyone.
My point was that the vaccines are safe and effective since the post I responded to tried to compare the safety and effectiveness of Ivermectin to those of the vaccine. There’s really no comparison between the two options at this point. That may change if real studies are conducted on Ivermectin. Most researchers probably don’t see the point though given the vaccines are proven.

And I do understand the difference between the Ivermectin being discussed in the media and the human version. And I do agree it’s being disingenuous to make it seem like they are linked.
 
We can debate but calling someone stupid for presenting information is no it.

there is a difference in posting info vs believing something and posting things to back it up.

Am I right?
I agree, but we know how this goes. If the information you post is skewed to one side then people start to see the agenda and that certainly drives the type of response you’ll get. Not even specific to this, but in general.
 
I’ll gather all that info in a bit.

tired of you.

drinks still on me next time in Munich.
But online it’s time for you to catch these e-hands
Never been to Munich, but I know you be in Charlotte so that’s more feasible, lol.

And I want the expensive shit too! Don’t try to push that Macallan 18 on me. I want the 25 minimum.

😂
 
I agree, but we know how this goes. If the information you post is skewed to one side then people start to see the agenda and that certainly drives the type of response you’ll get. Not even specific to this, but in general.

Consistently skewed to one side too. That's also a key. Niggas posting information for 1 side then wanna say "I'm being attacked" lol
 
People who are flat out wrong or spreading misinformation should get no love for crying wolf.

You made a dumbass statement or you're spreading misinformation now take your lashings.
 
Someone who died after taking Covid vaccine:
*"It's rare though!"

Someone who died after ivermectin:
"Haha shit doesn't work!'

Make it make sense without bringing up left or right wing

He didn't die from ivermectin he died from being unvaccinated and catching covid.

The fact that he wouldn't take the vaccine but would take some other experimental untested shit is just icing on the idiot cake.
 
Yes, let’s play percentages. Tell me the number of people dying from the vaccine itself as a percentage of those who got the vaccine vs. the people that died from ivermectin use itself as a percentage of those that took it. This is the safe part.

Also, tell me the number of vaccinated people that caught Covid and were hospitalized or worse as a percentage of all vaxxed vs. the number of people who caught Covid and were hospitalized or worse as a percentage of all those who took ivermectin. This is the effective part.

But for the record, these are the kind of posts where people would dispute with you and you’d claim we’re attacking you for personal medical reasons for not getting the vaccine.

1AE85A4B-8E0A-486E-BD63-92D2D3E51AEE.gif
 
The goal posts keep changing!

So if you don't get the third jab after the two you already got you'd be labelled as "vaxxed anti-vaxxer" ain't that right @B_A 😂

Ya'll got to stop framing shit this way. The goal post isn't moving. The pandemic is dynamic in nature and the response has to be dynamic too. Again, I got vaccinated in April and they were saying back then we would likely need booster shots, and that was before the Delta variant became a thing.

If you don't want to get the vaccine, that's fine, but you gotta stop misrepresenting shit.
 
He didn't die from ivermectin he died from being unvaccinated and catching covid.

The fact that he wouldn't take the vaccine but would take some other experimental untested shit is just icing on the idiot cake.
Yea that's what I meant saying "after taking ivermectin". Not that ivermectin was cause of death.

Oxford running a study on ivermectin now. CDC approves it in clinical trials only. And if a doc can't get a patient to get vaccinated and thinks ivermectin might help as a last resort then why not? It's cheap and safe when prescribed by a doctor.

And there were a few local stories where it helped a patient already on ventilator reverse course and get back to health.
 
Back
Top