Marc123
You got it dude!
I trust the science. Maybe y'all should too.
OK. that's fair.
Do you believe Rand Paul was sincere in his questioning of fauci? Was he bein genuine?
I trust the science. Maybe y'all should too.
I really don't care, if the study is based in science and fact.OK. that's fair.
Do you believe Rand Paul was sincere in his questioning of fauci? Was he bein genuine?
I really don't care, if the study is based in science and fact.
it means what I said. I don't care about rand paul. He didn't conduct or publish the study. Why does it matter if it gets to the truth?I'll take that as a "no".
For all I know the paper he's referencing is bullshit. In that case fuck him.
If not, fuck him anyway, but let's see the data
it means what I said. I don't care about rand paul. He didn't conduct or publish the study. Why does it matter if it gets to the truth?
Why are y'all obsessed with rand Paul?
Like I said pages back, politicization of the pandemic has done more harm than the pandemic itself. And that goes for both sides.
it means what I said. I don't care about rand paul. He didn't conduct or publish the study. Why does it matter if it gets to the truth?
Why are y'all obsessed with rand Paul?
Like I said pages back, politicization of the pandemic has done more harm than the pandemic itself. And that goes for both sides.
DeathSantisseeing those Delta variant case numbers going up now all of sudden supports vaccines…
Do u know fauci was pushing for gain of function research in 2012 and said the benefits (including worldwide pandemic) outweighs the risks?Ugh. It's about trust.
I trust fauci based on his record and integrity
This is equivalent to police saying police killing was justified.Fauci said the paper rand was talking about IS NOT what he claims it is. And ppl in that field have studied it and agree w fauci.
They called experts who pushed lab leak hypothesis conspiracy theorists. They were that 2% u are referring to.Its jus like 98% of scientists agree climate change is man made, but there are 2% out there who are quacks. I say that to say, as Fauci said Paul is basing his entire point on ONE scientist. Odds are that scientist is a quack.
U read that wrong. Let me say it again. If it leads to the truth, I don't care what his intentions are.Plus you add the fact that rand has ulterior motives.
Do u know fauci was pushing for gain of function research in 2012 and said the benefits (including worldwide pandemic) outweighs the risks?
This is equivalent to police saying police killing was justified.
They called experts who pushed lab leak hypothesis conspiracy theorists. They were that 2% u are referring to.
U read that wrong. Let me say it again. If it leads to the truth, I don't care what his intentions are.
You're missing it bruh. Ppl who stand to lose something are the ones telling u there's nothing to see here.Bruh. That police comparison is fucked. Like frfr. No cool bro.
Literally anyone can be a cop. And there is a climate of systemic racism rooted in the American police force. That's why I'm skeptical of the police.
this is false. U only trust scientist that fit the narratives of the politicians and figureheads u don't question. Scientists conducted a study that Rand Paul regurgitated. Bc u don't trust rand Paul, those scientists are, as u put it, "quacks". U don't trust science at all.A trust a scientist way more than I trust some random cop.
Respectfully, strongly disagreeAgain that comparison is fucked and problematic
Rubato posted an article showing that antibodies from Covid infection are projected to last a life time. But I'm seeing other articles saying depending on your infection, especially if asymptomatic, that the antibodies may not last as long.Problem is how do you know? If you're asymptomatic or maybe just had a more mild case than most and didn't realize. Can they still detect that in your system now? Is there a way to identify people with natural immunity?
Fauci Argued Benefits of Gain-of-Function Research Outweighed Pandemic Risk in 2012 Paper | National Review
Fauci argued a pandemic was more likely to occur naturally than through gain-of-function research.www.google.com
View attachment 592777
View attachment 592779
View attachment 592782
View attachment 592784
View attachment 592786
View attachment 592787
I implore y'all to make up your own mind instead of reading headlines and retweets. Do yourself a favor. Fuck politics.
Look at my previous posts. I stated multiple times I'm not trusting either. Show me the paper rand is referencing..let us all see the data. That's it. Fuck a Fauci and fuck a rand Paul.OK. My main point still stands.
Fauci is claiming what rand was referring to is NOT what he claims it is.
It appears you are giving credence to what rand is selling.
I dont. Cuz i dont believe rand AND odds are Rand doesn't believe it either....its all reality TV. Rand knows the base dislikes Fauci for various reasons. So going at fauci at hearing after hearing wins him brownie points with the base. He is jus like Lindsey Graham.
Question: do you agree w what rand is alleging...that fauci lied to Congress thus should be arrested and charged?