All I'm saying is there's a difference between posting something for 100 followers vs posting the exact same thing for 1,000,000 followers.
100 followers is insignificant.
The problem is that 50 has a history of doing this.
The way the law works, if there's a precedent set by an earlier case than whatever the judgement was in the earlier case will apply to the new case. The Rick Ross's wife case set the precedent and 50 was found guilty.
If I was the judge I'd throw the book at 50.
He's playing below the belt, no pun intended.
Lmao...just read this again and realized you have absolutely no idea what precedent means from a legal standpoint.
Precedent is based on prior cases involving similar facts, not prior cases involving the same individuals. The facts of 50’s prior case were completely different from this situation.
Actually when he lost the case to Rossy s babymoms his defense was that her sextape was already out there and all he did was release it on his platform and lost..
bc he can afford it.So why would he do the exact same thing again?
It defies logic.
Yeah but if Joe Shmoe posted those photos, it wouldn't warrant a lawsuit.
The prosecutor would ask Joe Shmoe how many followers he has and Joe Shmoe would say, "a hundred".
Then the jury would have to decide if Joe Shmoe posting lewd pictures to 100 followers was illegal and what the punishment should be. I don't think the jury would punish Joe Shmoe for posting those pictures to 100 followers the same way they would punish 50 for posting the same photos for millions of followers.
50 stays getting sued. You'd think the money would be dried up by now, but dude totally has a business mind and has made major moves even though he's been quiet as hell music wise. I mean he still releases music, but he's no where neat where he used to be
Has 50 released anything noteworthy in the past 10 years?
This trash chick is just trying to look for a sponsor
Bc he’s a fu**ing IDIOT!!So why would he do the exact same thing again?
It defies logic.