Subway’s bread deemed NOT bread due to its high sugar content
- Thread starter VIBE
- Start date
VIBE
Do More. Be Legendary.
They’re the number 1 fastfood chain. Suing them is a drop in the ocean
16bitSheez
Je Ne Sais Quoi
Chicken, pork and not even beef, but “cattle”.
bruh toss these dudes overboard.
bruh toss these dudes overboard.
I do lol just not from no damn subwaywho tf eats a tuna sandwich anyways?
This dont even make no sense. A can of tuna is literally a dollar...might even be less than that. They can afford tom brady and steph curry for them commercials, but they skimp on one of the cheapest food products in existence.
I'd hope all their stores burn to the fuckin ground, but I know they got insurance
I'd hope all their stores burn to the fuckin ground, but I know they got insurance
VulcanRaven
Active Member
Its the American way. Spend more on promo than your actual productThis dont even make no sense. A can of tuna is literally a dollar...might even be less than that. They can afford tom brady and steph curry for them commercials, but they skimp on one of the cheapest food products in existence.
I'd hope all their stores burn to the fuckin ground, but I know they got insurance
dasmooth1
Active Member
In a capitalist world marketing/style will always be more important than substance. Sadly.
OGDirtyD
NAWF ATLANTA ×
Like that meat in the tuna can aint questionable eitherThis dont even make no sense. A can of tuna is literally a dollar...might even be less than that. They can afford tom brady and steph curry for them commercials, but they skimp on one of the cheapest food products in existence.
I'd hope all their stores burn to the fuckin ground, but I know they got insurance
The Lonious Monk
Celestial Souljah
lol Everyone thought the seafood sub was a lie, but at least that was made out of seafood (mostly pollock instead of crab). But they really outdid themselves with this shit. How is your tuna sub not just going to be tuna-free but fish-free altogether?