konceptjones
The one between three and three.
If it stops 1, isn’t that enough? And if limiting the number of guns stops 10, isn’t that enough? And if banning assault rifles stops 20, wouldn’t that be enough?
See, this is where your bias for being able to keep your toys is on full display. If you say anything other than “yes that would be worth it”, then you’re ok with the killings as long as you keep yours. And that’s your hard truth.
Assault rifles have already been banned. Haven't been able to buy once since '86. That's something that you and your ilk utterly refuse to acknowledge. An "assault rifle" is either full auto or has select-able fire between semi auto and full auto (and sometimes "burst" fire). There isn't a single gun on the market right now that can do any of that, hence there are no "assault rifles" on sale today to the general public.
Let you tell it and this is an assault rifle:
The Ruger 10/22 is semi automatic and magazine fed and shoots a .22 caliber bullet. Must be an assault rifle, right??? After all, the AR 15 is semi-automatic, magazine fed, and also shoots a .22 caliber bullet albeit one with more powder behind it (just like my CMR30 that shoots a .22 with more powder behind it).
Know what it is you're talking about before you try to argue a point.
As for the rest of what you said:
"It stopped one but 34 still happened"
This makes sense to you???
"Yeah these other niggas dead but... um... we stopped this one"
In 2022, 74 people died in mass shootings. That same year over 10,000 people died because of drunk drivers. Are you ready to ban all alcohol sales? Cause if you're not, then you really need to kill all that noise. You don't give a fuck about the people like you claim, you don't give a fuck about "saving lives", you're simply parroting Democratic talking points about guns, which you've already shown to be the case repeatedly.