Let's start by saying that the meaning of "Real Man" is subjective.
If there is no set definition for what a "real woman"is, as many believe and have expressed in previous discussions. Then the same for a "real man".
So, if a man doesn't have a job, is he a mooch? or Does him taking care of home whilst the woman works considered "providing"?
To many people, A stay at home Dad is just as valuable as a man bringing in 6 figures.
If you say otherwise, does that mean you also believe that a woman who does the same is less than as well?
How about a man who provides millions but cheats on a weekly basis and never spends time with his children?
Is he a "real man" because he is providing financially but neglects other areas in the relationship?
In my opinion Khan's point is valid and speaks to the the "Mentality" a man should have. If you all thought the way that he did, you would seek to accomplish MORE than just bringing in the money. For to 'take care' of' someone is all encompassing not just financial, sexual and/or any other itemized action.
He has some nuggets to nibble on, but you'd do well to remember that ALL situations and views on said things vary per individual.
What YOU believe to be less than a man/woman may be more than for someone else.