Welcome To aBlackWeb

Onlyfans deleting Prostitutes accounts and refunding subscribers

and this is why i called it lazy.

work for your money.

a chick can get a site up in less than a week......if she already has a following on IG.....point them to the site.
most sites have payment options.....

its really that simple.

even on OF you need to stand out some sort of way.......its the same thing.
So ur problem is what i stated..she ain't earn the arrogance of her position

it's cool to hate bruh its cool
 
So what are they classiying as sex workers? Women that accepted payments for sex or anyone who shows a titty is classified as a sex worker?
 
So mfs can go on for pages and pages about whatever tf....I ask a basic question of how we even got here then all of a sudden it's "ask onlyfans theyll help you out"

:really?:
i said they would have a better answer as that no answer will be sufficient because wit wasnt posted.....so i posted an implied answer that can be a legit reason.
 
DOS been saying it repeatedly.

It begins with scamming and deceptive marketing followed by self righteous indignation.

You see yourself as a businesswoman, you attract customers, deceive them, and then turn victim when they complain or try to shut you down?

Amazon isn't doing this. Walmart isn't doing this. The United States government doesn't do this. Why? Because even in the game of give and take, if all you do is take, your wins are short lived before you're forced out of the game.
 
So what are they classiying as sex workers? Women that accepted payments for sex or anyone who shows a titty is classified as a sex worker?
I learned the term from sex workers themselves.

Anyone, woman, man, or trans that willingly participates in the business of sex.

Strippers, prostitutes, escorts, porn stars, online content creators all qualify as sex workers because they sell sex, or the idea of sex, to their customers in exchange for payment.
 
DOS been saying it repeatedly.

It begins with scamming and deceptive marketing followed by self righteous indignation.

You see yourself as a businesswoman, you attract customers, deceive them, and then turn victim when they complain or try to shut you down?

Amazon isn't doing this. Walmart isn't doing this. The United States government doesn't do this. Why? Because even in the game of give and take, if all you do is take, your wins are short lived before you're forced out of the game.
this just shows how moral and ethics are for certain people.
 
DOS been saying it repeatedly.

It begins with scamming and deceptive marketing followed by self righteous indignation.

You see yourself as a businesswoman, you attract customers, deceive them, and then turn victim when they complain or try to shut you down?

Amazon isn't doing this. Walmart isn't doing this. The United States government doesn't do this. Why? Because even in the game of give and take, if all you do is take, your wins are short lived before you're forced out of the game.
So you are saying you want them punished to protect the consumer?
 
So you are saying you want them punished to protect the consumer?
I don't see it as punishment.

If you played James Harden 1 on 1 and he only wanted to play offense but vowed to quit if he had to play defense, the game would be over the moment he scored his first point.

Not a foul, not a tech. It's game over because he only wanted to score, not play the other side of the ball.

This is game over if onlyfans says "sex workers GTFOH" or "you can stay but you don't make money". These sex workers will leave in droves.
 
I don't see it as punishment.

If you played James Harden 1 on 1 and he only wanted to play offense but vowed to quit if he had to play defense, the game would be over the moment he scored his first point.

Not a foul, not a tech. It's game over because he only wanted to score, not play the other side of the ball.

This is game over if onlyfans says "sex workers GTFOH" or "you can stay but you don't make money". These sex workers will leave in droves.
Fam that analogy has no correlation to this argument. And no one would do only fans if there was no monetary value in it.
 
Then what are we talking about in here? Why are we assuming the platform is right but the girls are wrong?

Cmon Gabi. You know the answer.

Its cause we as dudes hate to see a woman use her body to make money.

Men pimp women? Its cool. We even call each other pimps. Women take the pimp out the equation but continue doing the same thing? They wrong and its a sign of the times.
 
no one trying to stop them.......well

people are but its not because they dont want them to eat.

niggas saying they getting the bait and switch
That's them niggas fault ala they need protecting

Tricks getting tricked, nothing new
 
It’s their platform they can do what they please. Just like @Goldie can ban you off his site if he so chooses for asking me this question. I suggest you email onlyfans and ask them.

Aye man, not taking sides but it dont work that way. You sign up and agree to a policy. They cant the next day change policy on their own and get rid of you. They will first have to email you and get you to agree to the new policy first.

Its illegal for them to change policy on the fly and get rid of you without any warnings and notifications. Not talking onlyfans. This is everything.
 
Cmon Gabi. You know the answer.

Its cause we as dudes hate to see a woman use her body to make money.

Men pimp women? Its cool. We even call each other pimps. Women take the pimp out the equation but continue doing the same thing? They wrong and its a sign of the times.
wrong bruh.....no one is even saying this.

thats a made up argument.

like no one is saying them cant make money.

no one
 
Back
Top