Welcome To aBlackWeb

Only a few bad apples huh?...Bad Cops Thread

Dumb asses!!!
11 Pr. George’s officers suspended after gun accidentally fired at holiday party

Eleven police officers in Prince George’s County have been suspended after a gun was accidentally fired at a holiday party over the weekend and two officers were injured.

Several off-duty officers were at a private home in Brandywine, Md., on Saturday evening when a privately owned handgun was discharged, according to Prince George’s County police.

The weapon fired once, injuring one officer in the hand and hitting a second by ricochet, police said Monday.

The officers were taken to hospitals, treated and released early Sunday, police said.

Police department investigators responded to the scene that night and are reviewing the circumstances behind the shooting.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/loca...2e98f91ee6f_story.html?utm_term=.a919e646d03e
 
https://lawandcrime.com/police/lapd...revenge-porn-rape-and-physical-abuse-scandal/

LAPD Embroiled in Alleged Revenge Porn, Rape and Physical Abuse Scandal


A female detective with the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) has filed a temporary restraining order against a senior LAPD officer over allegations that he distributed revenge porn of her after an alleged romantic entanglement went awry. And the detective in question is linked to another LAPD sex scandal from earlier this year.

According to local ABC affiliate KABC 7, Robbery-Homicide Division Detective Ysabel Villegas claims she was involved with Officer Danny Reedy for five years. Then, she says, things started going south. Villegas claims that Reedy began to physically abuse her in 2016–allegedly hitting her in the head twice. Villegas also claims that Reedy raped her twice in 2017.

Villegas apparently broke things off soon thereafter. But after that, the detective alleges, Reedy distributed explicit photographs of her without her consent.

According to Villegas, Reedy distributed those images to multiple members of the LAPD in an attempt to shame and humiliate her because he was upset about their alleged breakup.

One text message, allegedly sent by Reedy to Villegas, reads: “Retire now…I’ll make sure you do..you won’t be able to look anyone in the eyes soon.”

Reedy, for his part, denies the allegations.

Attorney Michael Williams represents the accused officer and says that his client never took any photographs of Villegas, doesn’t know who took them or distributed them–and that Reedy and Villegas never had a long-term relationship to begin with.

In comments to KABC 7, Williams also dismissed the validity of California’s controversial revenge porn law.

“Even if he did it–and I’m not saying he did–it’s academic anyway if one voluntarily participated in such photographs,” Williams told the outlet.

Villegas is being represented in her action against Reedy by attorney Lisa Bloom. Bloom correctly noted that under the current law, distribution of revenge porn is illegal in California.

Under California law, anyone “who intentionally distributes the image of the intimate body part or parts of another identifiable person, or an image of the person depicted engaged in an act of sexual intercourse,” is guilty of the misdemeanor offense of disorderly conduct–or revenge porn.

“She alleges that it was a very abusive relationship. That he physically assaulted her on a number of occasions–hitting her on the head for example. That he took explicit photos of her without her consent and that he threatened to expose her. Post those photos on social media and send them out to other people if she left the relationship,” Bloom told the local CBS affiliate.

LAPD Public Information Director Josh Rubenstein noted that while the department is typically prohibited from commenting on personnel matters, Reedy is currently assigned home duty.

One additional wrinkle: Ysabel Villegas is currently married to Jorge Villegasthe former LAPD assistant chief who abruptly resigned in November over allegations that he was engaged in an improper sexual relationship with a subordinate officer.

There are currently no indications that any of the various allegations from the two separate sex scandals are related.

A hearing on the Villegas-Reedy restraining order is currently scheduled for January 15.
 
https://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-inglewood-protest-20181223-story.html

Inglewood mayor defends destruction of police records as routine; activists continue to voice concerns

Inglewood Mayor James T. Butts Jr. on Sunday defended his city’s decision this month to allow the destruction of years of investigative records involving police shootings.

Many of those records would have become public for the first time under a new state law set to take effect Jan. 1, providing a window into a police department that for years was beset by allegations of excessive force, poor officer training and lack of transparency.

Butts, a former Santa Monica police chief, told The Times on Sunday that there is no connection between the new law and Inglewood’s action. The Times broke the story a day earlier on the council’s decision.

“This premise that there was an intent to beat the clock is ridiculous,” he said.

City officials, he added, would have nothing to fear from these records in terms of liability or embarrassment. A staff report indicates that the records go back as far as 1991.

“How would they be embarrassing to me?” said Butts, who became part of city government when he was elected mayor in 2011. “I wasn’t even here for those records. The records are what they are.”

The city’s decision attracted more than routine notice because of its timing and because it represented a change in city policy. Until this month, Inglewood required the Police Department to retain records on shootings involving officers for 25 years after the close of an investigation. Records of other internal investigations were to be kept six years.

Although these records were retained, they were not necessarily available to the public. That changes next week, because of Senate Bill 1421. The new law opens to the public internal investigations of shootings by officers and other major uses of force, along with confirmed cases of sexual assault by officers and lying while on duty.

Still, Butts maintained the city did nothing wrong.

“It’s actually quite routine for us to do records destruction,” he told ABC 7’s Eyewitness News. “The Finance Department, the Police Department and other entities — whenever they want to destroy records that exceed a time limit — they submit a staff report to the City Council and the City Council approves or disapproves the records destruction.”

But longtime community activist Earl Ofari Hutchinson and a group of local civil rights leaders are skeptical. In light of the new state law, he said, Inglewood’s action “continues a pattern of lack of accountability.”

For years, Hutchinson worked with the families of those killed in encounters with Inglewood police. He said a full disclosure under the new law could reveal new avenues of legal redress and also could provide families with important details about what happened to their loved ones. The documents also would allow the public to review how well the department handled internal investigations and how seriously the department has embraced reforms.

“This action sends a terrible message that lack of transparency is still the policy in Inglewood,” he said. Hutchinson called on city leaders to delay the destruction of documents.

The city staff report and the City Council’s resolution from its Dec. 11 meeting make no mention of the new police transparency law. The resolution says that the affected records are “obsolete, occupy valuable space, and are of no further use to the Police Department.”

Butts told The Times Sunday said that the city’s old retention policy dated from 2010 and, before then, there was no policy regarding records of closed cases.

A series of Inglewood police shootings around 2008 attracted heightened scrutiny from activists, media and federal investigators. The city’s policy on retaining records was adopted as city officials and the Police Department were trying to improve their practices and rebuild public confidence.

However, the 2010 policy eventually became an administrative burden, Butts said, because it applied to any discharge of a weapon, including cases when a dog charged an officer or when officers fired a weapon and no one was hit. The more serious cases no longer had any active threads, he said, because the related civil lawsuits had been settled and criminal investigations concluded.

But Marcus Benigno, a spokesman for the American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California, called Inglewood’s actions an attempt to thwart “the will of Californians.”

In the past, California police have shredded records to avoid scrutiny. In the 1970s, the Los Angeles Police Department famously destroyed more than 4 tons of personnel records after defense attorneys began requesting them. The move resulted in the dismissal of more than a hundred criminal complaints.

In response, the Legislature demanded that records be preserved but then took other measures, supported by police unions, to ensure the public had little access to them. The new legislation begins to unwind those restrictions.

Butts called the current incarnation of his city’s police department a model agency, despite a 2016 incident in which Inglewood police opened fire on a couple found sleeping in a car, killing both. Butts noted that five officers involved in that shooting no longer work for the department and that a review of the officers’ actions, which could lead to prosecution, is ongoing.

State law requires holding onto police records for at least five years and Butts said it makes sense for Inglewood to align with that standard.

Butts said he does not know whether documents already have been destroyed. The Police Department could have acted anytime after the City Council’s decision earlier this month, he said.

He is not inclined to reconsider.

“Then how long do you keep these records?” he said. “Do you keep these records forever? You’re not going to do that.”

la-1545608092-9mk05hen66-snap-image
 
https://www.sgvtribune.com/2018/12/...ooting-records-ahead-of-new-transparency-law/

Inglewood will destroy 20 years of police shooting records ahead of new transparency law

Civil rights leaders want the city to reconsider its 'dangerous and bad precedent'

Civil rights leaders are demanding that the city of Inglewood rescind its decision to destroy case files for nearly 150 police shootings and other critical incidents ahead of a new law that would have made those records public for the first time.

Until recently, Inglewood retained records related to officer-involved shootings for 25 years. Earlier this month, the City Council voted to reduce that time frame to five years and then voted to destroy the older records.

Activists see it as an intentional effort to avoid the accountability promised by Senate Bill 1421, a new law that allows the public to obtain personnel and investigatory records for officers involved in shootings, sexual assault and misconduct.

‘Living, breathing cases’
“These cases aren’t old, they’re still living, breathing cases that still have questions that demand answers,” said Earl Ofari Hutchinson, president of the Los Angeles Urban Policy Roundtable. “Family members are still trying to get answers as to why.”

Some of Inglewood’s files dated back to 1991. The council’s decision allows for the destruction of cases closed prior to Dec. 31, 2012.

The records slated for destruction include four fatal officer-involved shootings over a four-month period in 2008. In one instance, officers shot a homeless man 40 times. In another, Officer Brian Ragan shot postal worker Kevin Wicks after responding to the wrong apartment.

Ragan also was involved in the fatal shooting of Michael Byoune roughly a month before, and in the beating of Rene Melendez just days before he killed Wicks. The officer was cleared by the department for the shootings, but later fired in 2010 for copying internal affairs documents, according to a lawsuit in which the white officer alleged discrimination. That case was thrown out by a judge.

Police policies ‘outdated’
A U.S. Department of Justice review launched as a result of the 2008 incidents found the majority of Inglewood Police Department policies and procedures were “outdated.”

On Jan. 1, the families of those individuals could have received answers to long-standing questions, Hutchinson said. Did Inglewood conduct thorough enough reviews of those cases? Did the deaths spur any changes in the department? Were officers punished appropriately?

SB 1421 does not specify a time period, meaning many of the officer-involved shooting records could have been released.

A San Bernardino County sheriff’s union is preemptively challenging the law and arguing that it should only apply to incidents after Jan. 1, 2019.

According to a staff report, Inglewood plans to destroy nearly 150 case files, primarily related to officer-involved shootings, internal affairs investigations and use-of-force reviews. The City Council approved the destruction as part of a consent-calendar vote at its last meeting of the year. A recording of the meeting on the city’s Facebook account appears to be missing that portion of the session.

The city’s resolution states the police chief and city attorney determined the records are “obsolete, occupy valuable space, and are of no use to the Police Department.”

Mayor: Action is routine
Inglewood Mayor James T. Butts Jr. described the decision to destroy the records as routine.

“The City of Inglewood’s retention policy now mirrors the state-required minimum for records retention,” Butts said in an email.

Butts told the Los Angeles Times, which broke the story over the weekend, that he did not know if the records had been destroyed yet. Butts indicated he was not likely to bring the topic back for review.

“The premise that there was an intent to beat the clock is ridiculous,” he told The Times.

Hutchinson said he is hopeful the City Council will reconsider the destruction after the holidays, assuming the records have not been destroyed by then.

“It sets a dangerous and a bad precedent,” Hutchinson said.

Undermines accountability
Erwin Chemerinsky, dean of the UC Berkeley School of Law, called Inglewood’s actions “disturbing.” The decision undermines accountability, sets a terrible precedent and harms the ability for researchers to study these cases, Chemerinsky said.

Inglewood’s decision to reduce its retention policy from 25 years to five years just a month before the new law takes effect undermines any claim that the City Council decision was simply routine.

“It seems so clear this is being done in response to a California statute that is trying to increase accountability when deadly force is used,” Chemerinsky said.

Inglewood and other cities should see the records as opportunities for studying trends and learning from mistakes.

“Knowledge is always better than ignorance,” Chemerinsky said.
 
https://www.montgomeryadvertiser.co...st-officer-warned-another-ferguso/2227954002/

Two years before MPD officer shot an unarmed black man, complaint against officer warned of 'another Ferguson '


Barefoot and handcuffed in the street, Jerome Upshaw stood with police in the darkness outside his home, his detainment the result of a noise complaint — a non-arrestable offense — and Upshaw’s refusal to provide his social security number or date of birth to the responding officer, Aaron Cody Smith.

It wasn’t until Smith’s supervisor, Montgomery Police Department Lt. T.E. Roberts, arrived on the scene that Upshaw was uncuffed. The magistrate had answered the phone despite it being past 2 a.m. and told Roberts that Upshaw had the right to deny police any information.

Hours later, after the officers left, the party ended and the sun rose, Upshaw filed a complaint with the city accusing Smith of employing excessive force and asking that MPD train its officers on interacting with "individuals of all races in low-risk situations.”

According to the complaint, Roberts apologized as he unlocked the cuffs on Upshaw’s wrists and said there were a lot of young officers on the force. Smith was 21 years old at the time of the incident.

“At one point during the incident, Lt. Roberts commented about not wanting another Ferguson here in Montgomery,” Upshaw wrote. “If the Montgomery Police Department wants to avoid the tragedy and ensuing unrest that occurred in Ferguson, Missouri, the Department should take every possible step to avoid using excessive force, and comprehensively train officers on how to interact with residents in a courteous manner, deescalating minor conflicts instead of turning a routine exchange into a possibly dangerous and damaging altercation.”

When asked about the Ferguson comment during the following city investigation, Roberts testified "he doesn't think he said that."

Upshaw filed the complaint on Aug. 17, 2014, eight days after the police shooting of 18-year-old Michael Brown rocked Ferguson and lit ablaze a national furor against police brutality, particularly the deaths of unarmed black citizens at the hands of white officers.

The complete city investigation file, obtained by the Montgomery Advertiser this week, shows that the city interviewed Upshaw and Smith as well as four other officers and three of Upshaw’s guests who witnessed Upshaw being detained.

Smith was found to have not violated city policy regarding unlawful detainment.

Four years later, Smith awaits trial, charged with the February 2016 on-duty murder of Greg Gunn, a 58-year-old unarmed black man who fled a 3 a.m. stop-and-frisk.

Gunn had been walking home from a card game when Smith asked him to put his hands on the vehicle. Mid pat-down, Smith said he felt a hard object and that Gunn knocked his hand away and fled.

Smith chased, beat, tased and eventually shot Gunn several times outside Gunn's neighbor's house. No gun was found on Gunn's person and State Bureau of Investigation agent Jason DiNunzio testified in a preliminary hearing that Smith never had charges on Gunn.

Smith argued that after a rash of burglaries in the area, "it didn't matter who was walking."

"You can't catch a burglar unless you get out and talk to someone. It was Mr. Gunn's actions that led to where we wound up," Smith said at his immunity hearing. "Once you place your hands on a police officer, you go to jail. It’s simple as that."

The trial is currently on hold as Smith awaits a decision from the Alabama Supreme Court as to whether or not he is immune from prosecution, an appeal of a lower court ruling that the shooting was not within the scope of his duty as an officer.

Throughout Smith's immunity hearing and previous proceedings, Smith's defense has portrayed Gunn as a "career criminal," citing his last arrest for stealing a refrigerator in 2005 and a 2007 altercation with police who were conducting a warrant check on Gunn at his Mobile Heights residence.

But little has been revealed of Smith's background. Mayor Todd Strange and MPD Chief Ernest Finley said that Smith has twice been named Officer of the Month, but MPD denied a request by the Advertiser for Smith's personnel file following the shooting.

Though the city investigation found that Smith did not unlawfully detain Upshaw, the complaint and investigation file portray the views of one citizen that Smith escalated a situation Upshaw believes could have been handled more civilly.

Attempts to reach Upshaw were unsuccessful.

According to the interview files included in the investigation file, Smith told Upshaw he was not under arrest.

Smith told investigators he handcuffed Upshaw because "he didn't know what the homeowner's demeanor or level of non-cooperation would be."

"Smith further stated the homeowner was not being combative, he only detained the homeowner in handcuffs until he could determine the identity for the citation," the investigation reads.

Smith responded to Upshaw's residence at approximately 2 a.m. Aug. 17, 2018, after receiving a noise complaint. Upshaw was hosting a party for the Southeast Immigrant Rights Network's annual conference and met Smith out front. Upshaw provided his name. Smith asked that the music be turned off and the guests be asked to leave, according to Upshaw.

The music had already been turned down, but Upshaw said he wouldn't ask his guests to leave.

Smith said he would issue a citation if Upshaw didn't disperse his guests and asked Upshaw for his social security number and date of birth.

"Mr. Upshaw stated when he refused to give Officer Smith the requested information, Officer Smith made the comment, 'We can do this the easy way or the hard way,' the investigation reads.

Smith asked Upshaw to step off the porch and "immediately grabbed his arm and began patting him down for weapons and handcuffed him with his hands to the rear."
 
"He told me I was being detained for not cooperating," Upshaw wrote in a statement included in the file. "The whole thing happened so quickly, I had no idea what was happening until the cuffs were on me. I had thought he was just asking me to step off the porch to continue talking and clarify the situation."

Two other officers arrived on the scene and one of Upshaw's guests, an attorney, stood with him while Upshaw was questioned "by the three white male officers."

Upshaw, a retired 20-year Air Force veteran, who is black, wrote in his statement about the impact of the moment: "I live in a quiet residential neighborhood and I had spoken with our neighbors in advance to let them know that we were planning to host a party with music and a few dozen guests. As one of the few black men living in the vicinity, I had spent years of tireless effort to build up credibility and trust among my neighbors. After that night, I feel like those 15 years of effort have vanished overnight, and I'm left feeling violated with no good cause."

Upshaw said he was cuffed for between 30 minutes to an hour and that the entire incident lasted about 90 minutes.

Despite the magistrate informing Lt. Roberts that Upshaw had no obligation to provide information to police, the investigation concluded that, "The preponderance of evidence shows Officer Smith was justified in his investigative detention of Mr. Upshaw for the purpose of determining his identity for the issuance of a noise citation."

"In addition, (Smith) also testified the yard contained about 25 individuals and many did not speak English. Therefore, Officer Smith's decision to handcuff Mr. Upshaw and detain him is consistent with actions necessary for officer safety," the investigation reads.

The other officers who responded to the scene after Smith called for assistance agreed with Smith's decision to handcuff Upshaw.

Cpl. C.L. Grier testified that "he would have taken the same action that Smith took if the homeowner refused to provide him with information." Cpl. D.M. Hathcock testified "they have always been trained to place someone who doesn't want to cooperate in handcuffs."

Upshaw said he was "scared, embarrassed and angry" throughout the incident.

"Being shackled makes you feel extremely vulnerable. Even that one incident has had an effect on my self-worth," Upshaw's statement read.

Although Smith was found to have lawfully detained Upshaw, the complaint and subsequent investigation may become part of the case against Smith.

The state earlier this year filed a motion for discovery seeking the complaint.
 


https://www.theledger.com/news/2018...ease-video-of-shooting-that-killed-haven-teen

Lakeland police release video of shooting that killed Haven teen

LAKELAND — An early morning shooting Wednesday involving Lakeland Police Department officers has left a Winter Haven teenager dead.

The incident took place during a gathering of about 200 people in the parking lot of Salem’s Gyros and Subs restaurant, LPD said in a news release. LPD spokesman Gary Gross said the agency received a call from an employee at Salem’s requesting officers to clear the parking lot at 101 E. Memorial Blvd., at the intersection with North Florida Avenue.

Michael Jerome Taylor, 17, of 3741 Imperial Drive in Winter Haven, died after being shot by officers, Lakeland Police Chief Larry Giddens said.

Officers responded at 2:21 a.m. to a call from an employee at Salem’s about a large crowd gathered in the parking lot, LPD said. Officers attempted to clear the parking lot of people loitering when Officer Raj Patel noticed a black Chevrolet Camaro that fit the description of a vehicle stolen from Winter Haven.

The vehicle, reported stolen to the Polk County Sheriff’s Office, was parked sideways facing southwest, an LPD news release said. As multiple officers approached the vehicle, the driver, later identified as Taylor, attempted to flee by rapidly accelerating the car, placing officers and others in immediate danger, LPD reported.

The vehicle accelerated south toward Officer Markais Neal, putting him in fear for his life, and he fired at the vehicle, the release said. Two other officers also fired at the vehicle as it accelerated through the parking lot, striking several vehicles and a utility pole.

The Camaro continued south, hitting another vehicle and propelling it into the wall of an adjacent business, Bike Barn. At some point during the incident, a female passenger jumped out of the stolen vehicle and was detained, LPD said.

Officers removed Taylor from the driver’s seat and immediately began first aid. A firearm was found on the driver’s side floorboard of the Camaro, LPD said.

Taylor was transported to Lakeland Regional Health Medical Center and was later declared dead. As of Wednesday afternoon, LPD said it was unclear how many times the suspect was shot or how many rounds the officers fired. The Lakeland Police Department’s Violent Crimes Unit and the State Attorney’s Office responded to the scene.

LPD released surveillance video Wednesday afternoon from a camera fixed at Salem’s showing the entire 42-second episode.

Taylor was on felony probation as a violent offender of special concern under the anti-murder act for robbery with a weapon, burglary while armed, fleeing and eluding with a high-speed chase, burglary of a conveyance and grand theft auto, LPD said. The loaded gun found in the Camaro had previously been reported stolen.

The female passenger is currently in custody, according to Giddens. LPD is not identifying her because she is a witness to a homicide.

Patel, 23, has been with LPD for 18 months and Neal, 28, for one year. A third officer, Joseph Novis, 25, also was involved in the shooting, LPD reported. As is agency policy following officer-involved shootings, the three have been placed on paid administrative leave for a minimum of three days.

Crime-scene tape surrounded the parking lot Wednesday morning. Several vehicles remained in the parking lot, and the restaurant was closed.

The black Camaro remained in place, its front end touching the parked car that crashed into the Bike Barn wall. Bullet holes could be seen in the rear window and the left and right rear side panels.

Salem’s was the site of an incident early Thanksgiving morning in which a melee broke out and several people were arrested. The eatery is a regular gathering spot for people who congregate after nightclubs close at 2 a.m., Gross said following that incident.

Gross said many of those who gather at Salem’s migrate from Rumors, a nightclub at 935 E. Memorial Blvd. in the Town Center shopping plaza, about six blocks east of Salem’s. The restaurant is usually open until 4 a.m.

Records provided by LPD show that the agency received 203 calls for service from the vicinity of Salem’s in the past year. The calls included narcotics violations, fights, theft, assault and battery and a hit-and-run incident on Sept. 23.

The records indicated LPD received 325 calls for service in the past year from the vicinity of Rumors for things such as narcotics violations, fights, assault and battery and an episode of shots fired on April 2.

Salem’s is a small chain of restaurants based in Tampa. A woman who answered a call Wednesday morning at the corporate office said no one was available to talk to the media.

Gross said LPD might have a discussion with Salem’s management to see whether the business is taking steps to ensure safety on its property.

“Like a lot of other businesses, they just call when it gets out of control,” Gross said. “It would be up to them if they want to hire a detail officer.”
 
https://www.mercurynews.com/2018/12...sing-wrong-car-but-stand-by-officers-actions/

Fatal Christmas shooting: San Jose police acknowledge chasing wrong car, but stand by officers’ actions

Family of woman killed demands more thorough investigation; chief says attempts to flee and ram patrol car were still a threat that justified deadly force


SAN JOSE — When four San Jose police officers opened fire early Christmas morning on a white Toyota ramming a patrol car after a high-speed chase, they thought they were aiming at suspects from a shooting across town.

Turns out, they were chasing the wrong car, police acknowledged Thursday. The driver, who was killed, and passenger, who was wounded, were both young women — and unarmed. Now, the family of the driver, Jennifer Vasquez, is demanding justice.

“We feel everything is unfair,” Virginia Vasquez, Jennifer’s aunt, said outside San Jose police headquarters following the news conference. “It was a different car and different person. We want this to go farther, more investigation.”

During a news conference Thursday, Police Chief Eddie Garcia said the shooting was tragic but his officers had little choice but to fire: The women were in a stolen car, led police on a high-speed chase and, after the vehicle crashed into a fence, refused to get out and surrender. Instead, police say, the driver put officers in mortal danger when she drove into the patrol car they were taking cover behind.

“We have to look at the totality of the circumstances here,” Garcia said. “Had these individuals just complied with the officers, and would have stopped, this would have ended very differently.”

He wouldn’t say how many times Jennifer Vasquez, 24, was shot. She died from her wounds. Her passenger, Linda Carmona-Bruno, 28, was shot once and treated and released from a local hospital before being booked into the Santa Clara County jail on an outstanding misdemeanor warrant.

Police would discover after the shooting that both women had had run-ins with police in the past. In particular, Garcia said, Vasquez had been involved in other police pursuits involving a stolen vehicle. Recent mugshots of both women were briefly displayed at the news conference.

Vasquez’s family members say they don’t know why Vasquez fled, but her cousin Conseula Contreras speculated she must have been frightened.

“She was scared. She was scared, for sure,” she said. “You know, when things happen, you don’t think.”

She also said that Jennifer had borrowed the car from a friend.

Family members said Vasquez was returning home to West San Jose — where she periodically lived with her parents — after having Christmas Eve dinner in Los Banos in the Central Valley.

“She was very kind, she had a lot of friends, always smiling,” Virginia Vasquez said, adding that her niece would often accompany her father to local flea markets to sell clothing and other goods. “She was a warm person, always making you feel welcome.”

Vasquez’s parents, Maria Elena Vasquez and Jesus Ramos, told reporters after the news conference that they are demanding a federal investigation and the immediate release of footage from police body cameras, which were in use at the time.

The pursuit began after 2 a.m. Christmas morning, Garcia said, when San Jose police responded to reports of gunfire near Story Road and Clemence Avenue in East San Jose. There, they found two people suffering gunshot wounds and a witness pointing to a white car driving down the street that supposedly carried the suspects.

As officers followed the driver, who refused to pull over, they looked up the license plate and determined the car was stolen. Police continued the five-mile chase from city streets onto Interstate 280 before the car exited onto Leigh Avenue and crashed into a chain-link fence at the corner of Fruitdale Avenue next to a playground.

Garcia said the occupants refused orders from police to get out of the car and surrender. Instead, he said, the car rocked back and forth to dislodge from the fence, and when the officers took cover behind one of their patrol vehicles, the driver rammed the cruiser. That’s when four officers opened fire. More than a dozen gunshots can be heard on a witness’s video shared with KGO-TV.

“Given the circumstances … it was reasonable and justified for the officers to feel that their lives were in danger,” Garcia said. “They weren’t the individuals responsible for the shooting … but had they not been in a stolen vehicle, had they not led officers on a high-speed pursuit, had they not tried to ram officers’ car, we wouldn’t be here today.

“At what point exactly they figured out it was a female driving,” Garcia said, “I do not know.”

Raj Jayadev, director of the watchdog group Silicon Valley De-Bug, accompanied the Vasquez family to the police station Thursday. He said that driving a stolen vehicle should not amount to a death sentence.

“Law enforcement mistakes can be lethal mistakes,” he said. “What constitutes an officer feeling the need to use lethal force has to be the highest of bars.”

At the site where the women were shot — the edge of Sherman Oaks Elementary School, near San Jose City College– mourners on Thursday brought candles, flower and photos and set them along the broken fence.

All four officers who opened fire Tuesday were placed on paid administrative leave, which is routine after an officer-involved shooting. The Santa Clara County District Attorney’s Office and the San Jose Police Department’s homicide unit are conducting a joint criminal investigation and the case is being monitored by the department’s internal affairs unit, the city attorney’s office, and the Office of the Independent Police Auditor.

Tuesday marked the city’s sixth officer-involved shooting in San Jose this year, and the second fatal incident. That count includes a shooting involving Santa Clara police that occurred in the San Jose city limits.

After Thursday’s news conference, Garcia met with the Vasquez family to personally offer his condolences.

“I can support and defend the actions of my officers,” he said, “while still having empathy and compassion for a mourning mother.”
 

https://www.azcentral.com/story/new...hootings-criticized-officer-group/2425579002/

Police association: Phoenix travel advisory over shootings a 'publicity stunt' and an 'insult'

A Phoenix police officer on Jan. 10, 2018, shot and wounded Isadore Byrd twice in the back after police say he ran from a standoff and pointed a gun at police.Phoenix Police Department, Phoenix Police Department

The Phoenix Law Enforcement Association is criticizing a local advocacy group that issued a travel advisory telling minorities to "exercise caution" when visiting the Phoenix area during the holiday season this year.

The advisory was issued on Friday by Poder in Action, a nonprofit organization in Maryvale, and cited the high number of police shootings in 2018.

"During this holiday travel season, visitors — particularly Black and Brown people — should exercise increased caution in the city of Phoenix due to the record number of police shootings," the Poder advisory said.

In Spanish, the word "poder" has various meanings. As a noun, it means "power" and as a verb it means "to be able."

On Thursday, the police association released a statement calling the Poder advisory a "publicity stunt heavy on emotion and inflammatory rhetoric designed to create racial divisiveness and the illusion that Phoenix Police officers are intentionally targeting minorities with deadly force."

Phoenix police statistics show most people involved in a police shooting in Phoenix this year were Hispanic, African-American or Native American. Poder noted that those groups make up 43 percent of the city's population.

So far in 2018, officers in Phoenix have shot 43 people, and 20 of those people died.

Of those shot, 16 suspects were Hispanic, nine were black and three classified as Native American. Fifteen were white.

Phoenix Police Chief Jeri Williams talks about the recent shooting of a Phoenix police officer, as well as the rise in police-involved shootings. Tom Tingle, azcentral.com

The police association statement said, "In each and every one of the ... instances, police or citizens and sometimes both were being threatened by criminals exhibiting active aggression while armed with weapons."

The association accused Poder of living "in a fantasy world while police officers have to deal with reality."

The Maricopa County Attorney's Office has so far deemed justified all of the shootings it has reviewed.

"Contrary to the image being ginned up by Poder of 'black and brown people' being targeted by police, the facts clearly show this not to be the case," the police association said.

"To suggest this as reality is an insult to not only all of the hard-working men and women who patrol our streets but to any citizen who read the data for themselves."

D54266BF-E628-4AA6-92DC-8F683F6AF8C2.gif
 
http://www.fox19.com/2018/12/27/cin...der-investigation-using-n-word-during-arrest/

Cincinnati police officer under investigation for using 'N' word during arrest

CINCINNATI, OH (FOX19) - A white Cincinnati police officer was suspended Wednesday after he used a racial slur while he attempted to arrest a black woman during an incident at Brownstone Nightclub in Roselawn on Saturday, according to our media partners at the Cincinnati Enquirer.

Officer Dennis Barnette's use of the slur can be heard on the body camera of a fellow officer, Police Chief Eliot Isaac wrote in an email to his boss, City Manager Patrick Duhaney.

"This type of behavior is unacceptable and will not be tolerated inside the department," Isaac wrote.

Isaac shared details of the incident via email Wednesday night with Duhaney, who in turn notified other city officials. The emails were obtained by The Enquirer. According to Isaac’s email, Barnette responded to the Reading Road nightclub to assist with parking complaints and traffic control. During the course of his response, Barnette tried to arrest the woman, and she pushed him.

“Subsequent to the incident, Officer Barnette is clearly heard on a nearby officer’s body-worn camera using a racial slur ... ( the “N” word),” Isaac wrote.

The mother of the alleged target of the slur says the officer was physical with her daughter.

“So the fact that he grabbed her and slammed her, I was really upset about that,” said Yolanda Miller. “How dare you use your badge and your position and the authority that you have to push on a defensive woman?”

Barnette’s police powers have been suspended, and he’s restricted to desk duty. An internal investigation has also begun.

"I share Chief Isaac’s concerns regarding this matter," Duhaney told city officials in his email. "It is unacceptable and not in line with the standard of conduct we expect from city employees."

The Cincinnati Branch of the NAACP says it strongly condemns the comment, and released this statement Thursday:

“The Cincinnati Branch of the NAACP strongly condemns the racist comment from Cincinnati Police Officer Dennis Barnette … while in the performance of his duties he used the N-word directed towards an African American female while responding to a call. The use of a racial slur has no place in society, nor working for a police department that claims to be a beacon of bias free policing and accountability. The word used is hateful, and coming from someone with the authority to use deadly force, is dangerous to those whom he is sworn to serve and protect. Officer Barnette’s actions disgraced not only him but the department and city that employ him. The tone is set at the top and we expect those in authority to act accordingly and terminate this officer from his position and that he not be allowed to serve as a police officer.”

FOX19 NOW reached out to the president of the Cincinnati FOP but have not yet received a response.

Members of city council were quick to react. Vice Mayor Chris Smitherman said he has not seen the video but says the behavior of the officer is “absolutely unacceptable.” Smitherman said the city manager is out of town so he felt he needed to address the issue immediately. He wants to make sure they identify and deal with this one officer’s behavior and not let it reflect on all of the others.

“It’s a serious issue. We’re going to take it very seriously. We’re gonna investigate it, we’re gonna get to the bottom of it. We will be very transparent in that investigation,” said Smitherman.

A February 2014 police memo shows Barnette was given the department’s Award for Exemplary Conduct. The award is given to members of the department who consistently conduct themselves in a highly professional manner, leading by example for co-workers to follow, for a continuous period of 36 months free of written reprimands, suspensions.

Here is the full email from Police Chief Isaac regarding Officer Barnett’s conduct:

"I want to make you aware of an incident that occurred on Saturday 12-23-18 in District Four. Officer Dennis Barnette, assigned to D4 third shift, responded to the Brownstone Nightclub located at 7733 Reading Road to assist with parking complaint and traffic control. During the course of his response, Officer Barnette attempted to arrest a female patron of the establishment. During this encounter the female resisted Officer Barnette’s attempt to arrest her by pushing the officer. Subsequent to the incident, Officer Barnette is clearly heard on a nearby Officer’s Body Worn camera using a racial slur (the "N" word).

This type of behavior is unacceptable and will not be tolerated inside the department. I have directed that his police powers be taken and he is restricted to desk duty. I have also directed the department’s Internal Investigations Section to begin an immediate investigation to determine all of the facts of the incident. I will keep you updated on the progress of the investigation and have a recommendation for discipline to you at the conclusion of the disciplinary process."

0cd71c18d775d1d8cf9decfdfdb8aa12.jpg
 
https://www.wric.com/news/national/...d-prosecutors-ready-to-take-office/1682312010

New crop of reform-minded prosecutors ready to take office
RICHMOND, Va. (AP) — To get elected as a district attorney, sounding tough on crime used to be the most effective campaign strategy. But in recent years, district attorneys have been winning elections by sounding big on reform.

Next month, at least eight new reform-minded prosecutors will take office in cities around the country after winning their local elections by promising to be more compassionate toward drug addicts and more evenhanded in the treatment of minorities.

Some won their races against long odds and deeply entrenched tough-on-crime attitudes.

In Chesterfield County, Virginia, a Democratic defense attorney who promised to eliminate cash bonds for nonviolent offenders won a traditionally conservative district held by a Republican for 30 years.

In Massachusetts, a lawyer who pledged to stop prosecuting a list of more than a dozen nonviolent crimes became the first African-American woman to win the district attorney’s office in Suffolk County, a district that includes Boston.

And in Dallas County, Texas, former Judge John Creuzot won after promising to reduce incarceration rates by 15 percent to 20 percent and to treat drug crimes as a public health issue. “Justice is HEART work” was part of his campaign slogan.

For decades, that kind of mantra by someone running for district attorney would have been seen as soft on crime and a turnoff for many voters.

But a shift began in some communities several years ago when candidates began tapping into public frustration over high incarceration rates, disparate treatment of minorities, and the decades-old war on drugs.

“In some ways, there’s just been a gap in accountability between what elected prosecutors have been doing and what the electorate wants,” said Taylor Pendergrass, senior strategist for the American Civil Liberties Union’s Campaign for Smart Justice.

Wesley Bell, a city councilor in Ferguson, Missouri, won a seat as prosecuting attorney of St. Louis County after he promised to eliminate cash bail for nonviolent offenders and to increase the use of programs that allow defendants to avoid jail time by paying restitution, doing community service, or completing a treatment program.

Bell, the first African-American ever elected to the position, defeated fellow Democrat Robert McCulloch, who had held the seat for 28 years, but angered some voters for his handling of a grand jury investigation into the fatal shooting of Michael Brown. The grand jury did not bring charges against the police officer who shot Brown, prompting riots in Ferguson in 2014.

“For years, the average citizen didn’t pay attention to DA and prosecutor races — these weren’t the sexy races,” Bell said. “But there’s been an increased awareness because of the work of a lot of good people.”

This new crop of prosecuting attorneys is facing resistance to proposals for sweeping reforms, mainly from police and prosecutors in their own offices who are accustomed to decades-old policies of locking up defendants as long as possible.

Assistant prosecutors and investigators in Bell’s office voted on Dec. 17 to join the St. Louis police union.

Rachael Rollins, who won the District Attorney’s seat in Boston, raised the ire of everyone from police to retail store owners when she promised to stop prosecuting crimes such as shoplifting, resisting arrest, larceny under $250, drug possession and trespassing. She pledged to dismiss the cases or require offenders to do community service or complete education programs.

“Accountability does not necessarily have to equal incarceration,” Rollins said. “There are many different tools we can use to hold people accountable.”

Larry Krasner, a civil rights attorney and public defender in Philadelphia, won a longshot bid for the District Attorney’s office in 2017.

During his first year in office, Krasner has let go about 30 assistant prosecutors — 10 percent of the 300 lawyers in his office — and made it mandatory that he personally has to approve any plea deal that calls for more than 15 to 30 years in prison.

One of the challenges he’s faced and the newly elected DAs will likely face is an institutionalized belief that prosecutors should always seek the most serious charge and longest sentence possible.

“I think resistance comes in many forms,” Krasner said. “There’s definitely a resistance that comes from the court system itself.”

Many of the new prosecutors have pledged to treat drug cases less like crimes and more like a public health problem.

Scott Miles, a longtime defense attorney, won the Commonwealth’s Attorney job in Chesterfield County, just south of Richmond, Virginia, after promising to reduce felony drug offenses to misdemeanors in simple possession cases. Miles promised to “replace our outdated war-on-drugs approach to addiction.”

Kevin Carroll, president of the Chesterfield Fraternal Order of Police, said he is concerned that Miles will go too easy on drug offenders who often commit other crimes to support their habit.

“If you’re not going to get in trouble for it, what’s the fear?” he said.

“The truth of the matter is, unfortunately, for a lot of the people who are addicted to drugs, their ability to understand the difference between right and wrong is compromised. The fact is they’ll do what they need to do to get the drugs, and if they have to steal, they’ll steal.”

Lucy Lang, executive director of the Institute for Innovation in Prosecution at John Jay College of Criminal Justice, said the new batch of reform-minded prosecutors represents a shift in the public’s attitude toward the criminal justice system.

“It’s a little hard to say whether this reflects a massive sea change,” Lang said.

“But I do think that this reflects an increase in awareness on the public’s part of the civil rights crisis we have found ourselves in as a result of overpolicing and mass incarceration over the past 50 years.”
 

https://www.cincinnati.com/story/ne...situation-keep-cops-lose-language/2471426002/

Union defends two cops who used 'N-word,' one black, one white

Body camera footage of a Cincinnati Police officer using a racial slur was released by the department Monday from the September incident. The Enquirer, Cincinnati Enquirer

Cincinnati's police union president is fighting for two officers, one black and one white, to keep their jobs after both were caught on body camera using the same racial slur.

Officer Dennis Barnette's police powers were suspended on Dec. 26 after a body camera caught him using what the chief called "the N-word" while Barnette attempted to arrest a black woman at a nightclub the prior weekend, officials said.

Officer Donte Hill had been caught on body camera using the same word in September, according to the police chief. After an investigation, Hill was reprimanded, but city officials have said "the matter was incorrectly categorized" is now being reevaluated.

Barnette is white. Hill is black.

The categorization error came to light after Barnette was stripped of his police powers as the city administration reviewed prior similar cases.

Several Cincinnati City Council members called for the officers to be fired, which would likely be outside the scope of what Police Chief Eliot Isaac can do under official discipline procedure and the officers' contract with the city.

Councilman Greg Landsman suggested the officers resign or called for the contract to be changed to give the chief more power to fire officers.

Dan Hils, Fraternal Order of Police Lodge 69 president, is defending both officers and said Landsman is grandstanding.

"Let's change the headlines," Hils wrote on Facebook. "White Councilman, Landsman, suggests firing African American officer and father of five."

Hils said on Facebook Wednesday he would not speak to the press because any statement taken out of context could result in "political disaster used to incite more anger."

Instead, he offered a statement against what the officers said: "The language used does not meet that standard and it is understood that the police administration will address its use with potential discipline... The FOP believes in reasonable and consistent discipline with guaranteed contractual due process."

He also lambasted those who called for the officers to lose their jobs.

"Did former mayor Dwight Tillery, Councilman Wendell Young or Councilman Greg Landsman call for the impeachment or resignation of President Barack Obama?" Hils wrote referencing a 2015 podcast with comedian Marc Maron in which Obama used the same slur, but only to indicate racism still exists.

Hils also accused the three leaders of seeking to suspend the concepts of due process, progressive discipline and contract law.

Hils himself was reprimanded in May, in part, for calling the predominantly black neighborhood of Avondale an "urban ghetto." He publicly apologized later.

“Two officers used an intolerable racial slur," Landsman told The Enquirer Thursday. "We have to support the Chief in sufficiently righting these wrongs and ensuring it doesn’t happen again."

Landsman said the city owes it to citizens, and other police, to ensure this type of behavior is over.

“Dan is doing his job, though it makes an already hard job of being a police officer even harder if nothing or very little happens in response to the two officers that used an intolerable racial slur,” he said.

The Cincinnati Police Department has not yet released the personnel files for Barnette and Hill, but Hils commented on the character of both officers on Facebook Thursday.

"[Donte Hill], who has yet to have his due process in an official hearing, is a father of five and a ten year veteran of the agency," he said. "He has been working nights in some of the most dangerous areas of the city. Officer Hill once witnessed a fellow officer stabbed. Imagine Officer Hill's trauma after such an event."

He also indicated Barnette is a Marine Corps veteran "who had been deployed during the Iraq war and survived a near miss by a scud missile."

Lou Arnold is the president Sentinels Police Association which represents black officers in Cincinnati. He said using any racial slur is unacceptable, and said the issue should be addressed with the entire department through yearly bias and cultural competency training.

"Race is a very difficult subject to discuss," Arnold said. "But it's a subject that needs to be discussed."

What's next
Barnette has not yet faced official discipline. He has been restricted to desk duty pending an internal investigation.

Hill was officially reprimanded after the September incident which was the result of normal police investigation, not an outside complaint. His police powers have now also been stripped as his violation is reassessed.

So neither officer is working out on the streets.

The Cincinnati Police Department's Manual of Rules and Regulations states: "Members of the Department shall not express any prejudice concerning race, sex, religion, national origin, lifestyle, or similar personal characteristics."

A first offense of violating this rule would result in a written reprimand, according to the manual. Second and third offenses result in suspension for up to seven days. A fourth offense could result in demotion or dismissal, the manual states.

Any discipline taken against an officer more than three years ago is not considered when tallying the number of offenses.

Isaac has said in letters to the city the language used by the officers is "unacceptable and will not be tolerated," but he declined to speak to the press on the matter.

The chief can take as much time as he would like in finalizing his decision on what discipline is appropriate for the officers. The officers can also appeal any decision he makes and take it to a peer review process in accordance with their contract.
 
https://www.twincities.com/2019/01/06/police-confront-2-men-1-white-1-black-only-1-is-shot-2/

Milwaukee police confront two men — one white, one black. Only one is shot
Ivan Moreno / Associated Press


MILWAUKEE — In the course of 15 months and in the space of one city block, Milwaukee police twice encountered two suspects they believed were armed.

One was black; one was white.

One was in fact unarmed; one had a gun.

One was shot; one was not.

That the black man was the one who was shot — though he had no weapon — might come as little surprise at a time when police shootings involving black men seem commonplace nationally.

Milwaukee has been an epicenter. In 2014, Dontre Hamilton, a mentally ill man, was shot 14 times by police. In August 2016, 23-year-old Sylville Smith was killed by an officer. After the first, the city equipped police with bodycams; after the second, there were riots.

The shooting of 19-year-old Jerry Smith Jr. in 2017 did not set off similar convulsions. And the blood-free resolution of the standoff involving 20-year-old Brandon Baker this past November drew little notice. But taken together, they prompt a difficult and unanswerable question:

If their races were reversed — if Smith were white, and Baker were black — would Baker have been the one who was left bleeding and writhing in pain?

___

In the darkness on Nov. 6, Election Day, Baker took to the roof of his the apartment building in which he lived and started firing guns. His neighbors, alarmed, called police.

Just after 5 a.m., two police officers sent to the scene encountered Baker on Michigan Avenue, in front of the entrance to the building.

He refused to drop the AR-15 semi-automatic rifle he was holding. He acknowledged that he had fired the shots earlier, and said he had posted a video of it on Twitter. He told the officers he was running for governor, that he was going to the polls to “air it out,” that he was going to start a militia. He had a right to bear arms, he said.

As they talked, other officers approached him quietly from behind, and tackled him.

“I’m not moving, don’t shoot me!” Baker screamed in the video he was broadcasting, which WISN-TV obtained before its removal from Twitter.

Not a shot was fired.

In addition to the rifle he was holding, Baker, had three loaded handguns — one in his backpack, another in his waistband, and a third in his jacket, prosecutors said. In his apartment, they said officers found LSD, psilocybin mushrooms and the psychoactive ingredient of marijuana.
Baker faces numerous charges, including recklessly endangering safety and “maintaining a drug trafficking place.” His public defender has ordered a second doctor’s evaluation to determine whether he’s competent to stand trial.

___

On Aug. 31, 2017, officers Melvin Finkley and Adam Stahl received a call about a man with a gun in the predominantly black neighborhood west of downtown Milwaukee. Finkley is black; Stahl is white.

It was around 1 p.m. when they got to the parking garage at North 29th Street and West Wisconsin Avenue. Jerry Smith was on the roof.

That afternoon, he and a friend had gone to a house in the neighborhood to confront someone with whom Smith had a problem. Police later said Smith and his friend were looking for a fight, and after a brawl ensued with several others, Smith left to get a gun. When an officer approached him to ask about the fight, he ran away and took to the roof.

A handful of officers below were yelling commands, telling him to put his hands up because they had him surrounded.

Two officers stood on the stairs leading up to the garage’s roof. When Finkley and Stahl approached, Finkley asked: “He got the gun in his hand?”

“He doesn’t have a gun in his hand, but he was hiding behind the AC unit,” an officer responded.

Finkley and Stahl climbed to the roof with their guns trained on Smith and joined the chorus of officers yelling commands. Smith briefly extended his arms just above his waist to show his empty hands, palms out, then began crouching slowly to the ground. That’s when the two officers fired three shots, with one bullet grazing Smith’s head and the others striking his abdomen.

“I’m going to die!” Smith wailed, on the ground. “I didn’t do nothing.”

The encounter lasted about 10 seconds. No gun was found.

___

Smith survived, but his right leg is partially paralyzed and he needs a cane to walk. He wasn’t charged with a crime and has a pending federal lawsuit against the police, alleging officers acted “with deliberate indifference.”

“I had my hands up. It’s on them,” Smith said at a recent news conference.

But the Milwaukee district attorney’s office reviewed Smith’s shooting and concluded the officers’ actions were justified because they “reasonably believed” Smith was armed, based on information from dispatch.

Milwaukee Police Chief Alfonso Morales said people need to consider “the totality of the circumstances” when an officer is involved in a shooting. He said officers are under stress and taking in a lot of information — from what they are told while responding to a call to their own observations — and they have to make sense of it all in seconds.

Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett declined to comment on Smith’s shooting because there’s pending litigation, but in a statement he cautioned against comparing the Smith and Baker cases.

“Comparing two separate incidents is inevitably problematic because circumstances police officers face and observations they make are different in every situation,” he said.

Others, though, are troubled by two encounters with very different outcomes.

Alderman Khalif Rainey, who is black, contrasted Smith’s shooting with how police apprehended Baker “without having to harm him at all.”

Rainey said he’s stopped believing he’ll never find himself in a situation like Smith’s.
“It’s real serious. At one point in time I thought, ‘Not me,’” he said. “But now it’s like, something goes wrong, you make the wrong move, you make the wrong gesture … and now I’m shot. Now I’m paralyzed. Now I’m dead.”
 
Back
Top