Report: Staten Island Cops Accused Of Planting Drugs On Black Teen Have History Of Racial Profiling
A pair of Staten Island police officers who allegedly planted marijuana in a black teenager's car earlier this year are now facing additional accusations of racial profiling, following an inquiry into their past arrests by the Legal Aid Society.
The analysis of recent arrests made by Officer Kyle Erickson and Officer Elmer Pastran, shared with Gothamist on Tuesday, revealed that the two partners have stopped "an extraordinarily high percentage of people of color in relation to the community they serve." In response to the findings, public defenders and police reform advocates are calling for a criminal investigation into the officers, amid fears that their alleged set-up of Lasou Kuyateh earlier this year was part of a larger pattern of evidence planting.
"While it is incredibly disturbing to watch video of Officer Erickson planting marijuana on Mr. Kuyateh, it is equally as disturbing to examine the patterns of practice among these two officers," said Aiden Cotter, an attorney with the Legal Aid Society representing Kuyateh. "Unfortunately, the actions of these two officers only exemplifies the racial bias that exists within the NYPD."
Despite working in a precinct where less than half the population is black and Latino, people of color comprise nearly 90 percent of individuals arrested by the partners since 2017. For street encounters, that number was as high as 93 percent. Out of 37 marijuana arrests made by the officers since 2017, people of color have been charged in all but four instances.
Cotter emphasized that the apparent racial bias in the officers’ marijuana arrests was largely in line with citywide enforcement discrepancies. According to a recent Times investigation, black people in New York City were arrested on low-level marijuana charges at eight times the rate of white people over the past three years.
“The NYPD does not want marijuana to be legalized because they would lose a frequently utilized tool in their over-policing of people of color,” Cotter told Gothamist. (The Legal Aid Society could not immediately provide the demographic breakdown of all arrests made in the 120th precinct)
The stark racial disparities were discovered as part of a Legal Aid Society inquiry undertaken following the controversial traffic stop and arrest of Kuyateh this past February. After officers claimed to have found a lit joint in the backseat of his car, Kuyateh, then 19, was held for two weeks in the Brooklyn Detention Center on $1,000 bail. He's made a dozen court appearances for the arrest in the months since, all the while maintaining that the officers planted the drugs.
While the charges were recently dropped, Kuyateh's attorneys are now accusing the Staten Island D.A.'s office and NYPD of blocking further scrutiny into the "abhorrent police misconduct" that led to the arrest.
Their concerns were outlined in two letters sent to Staten Island District Attorney Michael McMahon last week by the Legal Aid Society and the Association of Legal Aid Attorneys. According to Christopher Pisciotta, Attorney-In-Charge of the Staten Island Criminal Defense Practice at Legal Aid, the NYPD's own body camera videos "revealed criminal acts and misconduct" by Erickson and Pastran, including "planting evidence, arresting an innocent person, making false sworn allegations and assisting in the prosecution of manufactured charges."
They note that police body camera footage presented during pre-trial hearings shows Erickson telling Pastran: "We gotta find something, you know what I mean?" Erickson's recording device turns off moments later, but he remains visible on his partner's camera, and can be seen fumbling with an evidence bag near the window of Kuyateh's car. The footage, according to Pisciotta, then captures Erickson planting a joint in an area of the car that was previously searched. Just as Erickson purposefully reaches into the back seat to retrieve the alleged evidence, his own body camera is reactivated.
When the suspicious body camera footage was finally presented in court, eight months after the arrest, Judge Christopher Robles abruptly intervened to prevent the cross-examination of Erickson by Kuyateh's lawyers. In a highly unusual move, the judge then recommended Erickson hire a personal lawyer, according to the Legal Aid Society. The following day, the case was dismissed and sealed by the Staten Island D.A.'s office, with no further explanation from prosecutors or the judge.
Asked about the suspicious circumstances of the arrest and testimony, NYPD spokesperson Phillip Walzak told Gothamist last month that a "thorough investigation" had turned up no evidence of any wrongdoing by the officers. The department would not comment on the new revelations, except to reiterate that the officers had been cleared. The Civilian Complaint Review Board said it was investigating allegations within their jurisdiction, but would not elaborate.
"Too often, such matters are referred back to NYPD to police their own to no avail," wrote Pisciotta in his letter to D.A. McMahon. "The call for justice then rests upon you." In addition to demanding a criminal investigation into both Erickson and Pastran, the public defenders group is calling for a review of all prior convictions secured with the officers' help, citing the "ease in which the officers planted evidence" and an "undeniable pattern of racial profiling targeting black and Latino people for arrest and charges in a more diverse community."
"Community trust cannot remain when prosecutions are based on criminal acts and false testimony of police officers sworn to protect and serve," he added.
A spokesperson for the Staten Island District Attorney declined to comment for this story. You can read the full letters sent by the Legal Aid Society and the Association of Legal Aid Attorneys below.
Following publication of this story, a spokesperson for the Staten Island District Attorney's office provided Gothamist with the following statement: "After a thorough review of this case, the charges against the defendant were dismissed. Moreover, allegations against responding officers were determined to be unfounded."
Why did Seattle police rehire officer who punched handcuffed woman? Federal judge orders city to explain
Baltimore's New Police Commissioner Would Be City's 5th In 4 Years
Baltimore may soon have its fifth police commissioner in four years.
Mayor Catherine Pugh has nominated Joel Fitzgerald of the Fort Worth Police Department in Texas to be Baltimore's next top cop. The nomination starts the clock on what is roughly a two-month public interview process, and then Fitzgerald must be approved by the Baltimore City Council.
Fitzgerald has said he intends to "develop the type of rapport and relations necessary" to move Baltimore in a new direction. Pugh has said he is the person "best suited to lead the way forward."
He would take up the reins at a department that's been grappling for years on how to quell a stubborn gun violence epidemic. Moreover, the department's reputation is in tatters with the community it serves after an unrelenting series of scandals ranging from officer misconduct to corruption to tensions still frayed after civil unrest in 2015.
Pugh's nomination of Fitzgerald also sets into motion what many believe is an extraordinary vetting process by the Baltimore City Council.
Beginning on Sunday, a delegation of council members will travel to Fort Worth to hold interviews and meetings with business owners, clergy, elected officials and other residents to get a sense of Fitzgerald's interactions and standing with the community.
The council's findings from the Fort Worth trip will be compiled and released to the public sometime before the end of the year.
After the start of the new year, the city will hold a pair of hearings, with at least one of them open to the public, setting the stage for a high-stakes confirmation vote at the end of the January.
Members of the city council have called for more information from the mayor on how her office went about vetting Fitzgerald. They have also called for the release of a background investigation the mayor's office had compiled by an outside firm.
Councilman Brandon Scott, who has been one of the most vocal members calling for the release of the background investigation on Fitzgerald, said not having the report in hand had no bearing on his making the trip to Texas this weekend.
The mayor's selection was whittled from 51 candidates to one, Fitzgerald. He was the second choice of the panel of police executives Pugh had advising her in the search, according the The Baltimore Sun.
According to Pugh's press secretary James Bentley, Fitzgerald will have meetings of his own with members of the Baltimore community.
"As the Commissioner-designate for the Baltimore Police Department, [he] will be meeting with a wide range of community stakeholder groups in Baltimore prior to the City Council hearings, likely to occur mid-January. Until that time, he continues as the Police Chief of Fort Worth, Texas," Bentley said.
City leaders and residents alike hope that if Fitzgerald is confirmed, he'll bring some much needed stability at the top of the police department.
Interim Police Commissioner Gary Tuggle who has been serving in the position for months, withdrew his name from consideration for the permanent position in October, according to the Sun.
Tuggle was elevated to the post in May. Darryl De Sousa had resigned as commissioner after federal prosecutors charged him for failing to file three years of federal tax returns, beginning in 2013.
De Sousa, a 30-year veteran of the department, was in the top spot for only a few months after replacing former commissioner Kevin Davis. Davis was fired in January after the mayor grew impatient with the department's inability to reduce crime in the city.
Davis took over as city's top cop following the ouster of Anthony Batts, who was relieved of duties in the aftermath of the 2015 Baltimore riots following the death of Freddie Gray. Gray was a black man who died from injuries suffered while in police custody.
Aside from leadership turnover, Fitzgerald would also inherit a department trying to overcome scandal. In February a pair of Baltimore detectives were convicted by a federal jury of racketeering and other crimes related to the city's controversial and now-defunct Gun Trace Task Force.
And in 2017, the city of Baltimore and the Justice Department entered into a court-ordered consent decree, which came about after the Department of Justice report found police there disproportionately target African-Americans for stops and arrests.
Scathing grand jury report says police union head allowed to hinder investigations
An investigation by an Allegheny County grand jury found Pittsburgh police failed to conduct thorough and transparent criminal investigations after two officer-involved shootings in 2017, and found the police union president deliberately tried to block investigators, according to a scathing report made public Friday.
The grand jury said in its 46-page report that Fraternal Order of Police Fort Pitt Lodge No. 1 President Robert Swartzwelder acted with “deliberate malfeasance” and “utter disregard” for the policies and ethical standards of the Police Bureau following the Jan. 22, 2017, fatal police shooting of a Larimer homeowner, as well as after a non-fatal officer-involved shooting in East Liberty in April 2017.
The union stopped investigators from gathering evidence after those shootings, the grand jury found, and that conduct led to the “appearance of impropriety,” and what appeared to be a cover-up that involved multiple officers, the report said.
“However, our investigation revealed that this lack of cooperation was actually orchestrated by FOP President Swartzwelder, who fought at every stage to ensure those tasked with overseeing the investigation would not be provided with all the facts and evidence necessary to determine whether the officers were justified in their actions,” the grand jury wrote in its report. “His efforts were effective, in part, because the command staff from the city police acquiesced to many of Swartzwelder's demands and did not enforce long-standing policies on conducting critical incident investigations.”
The grand jury found that police command staff allowed Officer Swartzwelder to use “heavy-handed tactics,” to dictate police procedure. It said the “loose manner” in which command staff supervised the critical incidents prevented the grand jury from bringing criminal charges against Officer Swartzwelder.
“While we find the actions of Robert Swartzwelder fall short of meriting a recommendation of criminal charges, we so find only because no one with any authority told him to stand down when they should have,” the report states. “We cannot allege that he obstructed the administration of justice where those who are tasked with enforcing the law did not act on their authority.”
The grand jury did not recommend criminal charges against Officer Swartzwelder or anyone else in the police bureau. It also found that the officers involved in the fatal shooting in Larimer acted within the law.
The grand jury did recommend that Pittsburgh police bring in Allegheny County police to investigate officer involved shootings (which the city began doing in 2017), that it take pains to disseminate new policies in a timely manner, that command staff meet regularly with union leaders and that all officers receive training on their Miranda rights (warnings to those being questioned by law enforcement about their rights) and Garrity rights (warnings given to government employees who may be subject to an internal investigation).
The Pittsburgh Police Bureau responded in a written statement to the grand jury findings that it holds members to the “highest standards of professionalism” while also ensuring the constitutional rights of officers involved in critical incidents like officer-involved shootings.
The bureau pointed out that many of the report’s recommendations have already been implemented at the police bureau, and says other recommendations "are either not directed to the bureau or are confusing or vague."
A police spokesman declined to comment further Friday.
Officer Swartzwelder and the FOP wrote in a response to the grand jury report that "several of the factual claims" in the report "are not accurate." Officer Swartzwelder declined to comment further Friday.
The FOP response said union officials "strongly object to the report's conclusions regarding the impropriety of [Officer] Swartzwelder's conduct" at the various incidents, and said he was doing his job as union president and protecting the rights of police officers.
"He represents the rank and file police officers,” the response reads. “His job is not to represent the city. His job is not to help the district attorney prosecute police. Nor is his job to be overly concerned about the public relations aspect of how the advice given to his members by union reps and union attorneys might play in the media."
Mayor Bill Peduto said in a statement Friday that the city cooperated fully with the grand jury investigation, and emphasized that Allegheny County police have since December 2017 investigated the city’s officer-involved shootings as part of a memorandum of understanding with the city.
“Claims in the grand jury’s report about police bureau command staff ‘passivity’ at critical incident scenes before the MOU was implemented — when the investigations were then overseen by the Allegheny County District Attorney’s office — are addressed in the bureau’s answer to the report,” Mr. Peduto said in the statement. “It must be noted that at any time the supervising detectives from the district attorney’s office could have intervened to stop the FOP president’s interference at the scenes, but did not do so.”
The grand jury investigation began in the wake of the Jan. 22, 2017, police shooting of Christopher Mark Thompkins, 57, who was killed inside his house by officers who were responding to a security system alarm.
Mr. Thompkins’ ex-wife, Brenda Richmond, who was with him during the incident, said he grabbed her gun and chased away an intruder, later identified as Juan Jeter-Clark, by firing shots down the stairs. Police said Mr. Thompkins was “firing in their direction” when officers arrived.
A spokesman for District Attorney Stephen A. Zappala Jr. declined to comment on the report Friday, calling it “self-explanatory.”
Mr. Zappala previously accused police of hindering his investigation into Larimer incident on Finley Street, saying in September 2017 that his investigators were unable to get quick access to the crime scene and were stopped from immediately interviewing the involved officers.
While the grand jury identified "severe deficiencies" during the initial investigation into the Thompkins shooting by detectives J.R. Smith and Scott Evans — former Pittsburgh homicide detectives who joined the district attorney's office — the detectives themselves testified that things went smoothly at the scene.
It was only afterward that problems developed "when they returned to police headquarters to observe the interviews of the involved and witness officers."
The detectives expected to have brief contact with the officers involved in the shooting and to sit in on interviews with witness officers. Neither happened.
"Everything seemed to proceed per usual until Detectives Smith and Evans inquired as to when the interviews of officers would take place. The detectives were then told that they would not be participating in any interviews of officers that night, whether it was an interview of an involved, shooting officer or merely a witness to the shooting," the report said.
It was later learned that officers who were witnesses to the shooting had already been interviewed that night by a city homicide detective, with a city police sergeant and Officer Swartzwelder present, the report said.
"This scenario flies directly in the face of City Council's intent in passing the ordinance mandating outside, independent supervision of these incidents," the report said.
"Our investigation did not reveal that leaving Detectives Smith and Evans out of the witness interviews was an intentional act by any one member of the command staff. What followed, on the other hand, was a deliberate attempt by the FOP president to impede the ongoing investigation and an utter failure by city command staff to do anything about it."
The report said that Officer Swartzwelder became angry at Sgt. Glick for letting the DA's detectives review body camera footage from Officer Brendan Flicker.
"Swartzwelder argued with Sgt. Glick in the presence of officers Flicker and [Harrison] Maddox that the video was Pittsburgh police property and that representatives from the district attorney's office should not be watching it. Sgt. Glick disagreed, noting that he openly shares evidence with other law enforcement agencies and expects that others do the same for him and the city police force," the report said.
Officer Swartzwelder again tried to intervene, the report said, when Sgt. Glick indicated that the DA's detectives would be allowed to read Miranda warnings to the officers involved in the shooting and ask if they wanted to make statements, according to the report.
"Swartzwelder stood up, proclaimed that the detectives were not coming into the conference room, and declared that he and Officers Flicker and Maddox were leaving unless somebody was going to arrest the officers," the report said. "Sgt. Glick tried in vain to reason with the FOP president, explaining that the officers merely had to listen to the Miranda warnings and invoke their right to not give a statement, if that was their wish."
During the dispute over the body cameras, the report said that Sgt. Glick consulted with Deputy Chief Thomas Stangrecki — then an assistant chief — who backed him. But when the sergeant sought the help of his superior over the Miranda warning, there was a different result and Deputy Chief Stangrecki "decided not to intervene.”
"He told Sergeant Glick to allow Officers Flicker and Maddox to leave although they had not yet been contacted by the supervising detectives,” the report states.
The report said the police command staff "acquiesced to the heavy-handed tactics of an off-duty, subordinate officer."
Officer Swartzwelder behaved similarly after a non-fatal shooting in East Liberty on April 29, 2017, according to the report. In that incident, Officer Gino Macioce shot and wounded 20-year-old Christopher Howard after Howard robbed two women.
Officer Gino Macioce was placed in a patrol vehicle to wait for a replacement firearm, since his would be collected as evidence.
Two DA detectives were dispatched to the scene. Detective Fran Laquatra arrived and found City Assistant Chief Lavonnie Bickerstaff, who said she'd take her to see Officer Macioce. But before the pair could get to the patrol vehicle, they were stopped by Officer Swartzwelder, who “emerged from the vehicle where Officer Macioce was seated,” according to the report.
Officer Swartzwelder told the district attorney’s detective that her presence was a violation of Officer Macioce’s constitutional rights.
“Swartzwelder even went so far as to direct Detective Laquatra to a sidewalk away from the vehicle where Swartzwelder had determined that she would be allowed to stand,” the report reads. “His interference ultimately prevented the detective from ever setting eyes on Macioce that night. Swartzwelder's conduct again bordered on criminal obstruction."
The grand jury also cited Officer Swartzwelder’s participation in a podcast called "Blue Lives Radio." Officer Swartzwelder spent an hour criticizing the investigation of Officer Stephen Matakovich, who was involved in a fight at Heinz Field and charged in the incident.
"Not once during the hour does Swartzwelder place any fault with Stephen Matakovich, nor does he acknowledge that a federal jury found him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Instead, he casts wild aspersions upon others regarding their competency and ethics," the report says.
4 Florida police officers on leave after video emerges of one apparently kicking suspect
(CNN) — Four police officers in Coral Springs, Florida, are on administrative leave as the department investigates bystander video that shows one officer apparently kicking a handcuffed suspect.
In the cellphone video, obtained by CNN affiliates WSVN and WPLG in Miami, three law enforcement officers struggle with the suspect in the street before they walk him over and sit him on a curb.
A bystander who recorded the video Tuesday night told WSVN another officer kicked the suspect in the head while the man was sitting on the ground. The man was in handcuffs and was cooperating, he said.
"I could not believe that this was actually happening right in front of me," the bystander told the Miami TV station.
In the video, an officer kicks at the suspect.
One officer told the colleague to stop, a witness told WPLG.
Man accused of stealing soda and candy
In an arrest affidavit, a detective writes she tried to stop the suspect, Gabriel Narcisse-Beckford, 28, but he ignored her and kept walking. The detective said she tried to grab him by an arm but he pulled away and walked into traffic.
When the detective tried to grab the suspect again, the man took a fighting stance, according to the affidavit.
The detective and an officer wrestled the man to the ground, and the suspect grabbed the detective's gun but could not get it out of the holster, the affidavit said.
After the suspect stood up, the other officer used his Taser, and Narcisse-Beckford fell down, according to the affidavit. A third officer put handcuffs on the suspect, and then they moved him to a curb, it said.
The detective wrote: "Narcisse-Beckford continued to move his body while agitated which led (another detective) to believe he was attempting to stand up. (The detective) struck him with his knee on his right side to remain seated."
The report said the suspect told paramedics he is bipolar and has schizophreniaand was not taking his medication.
He was accused of stealing a soda and candy bars.
Two officers had minor injuries, the affidavit said. Narcisse-Beckford went to the hospital because an officer used a Taser, it said, and he was medically cleared.
Chief reportedly upset after watching video
"I wasn't happy with what I saw," Coral Springs police Chief Clyde Parry told WPLG after watching the video.
The chief spoke to the officers Wednesday, said Officer Chris Swinson, a police spokesman.
Swinson said none of the officers was wearing a body camera.
"We want our community to know that we take this matter very seriously," the department said in a statement. Police are working with the state attorney's office on a criminal investigation, Swinson said.
The department is asking for anyone who may have witnessed the incident to contact investigators.
According to court records, Narcisse-Beckford was arrested on suspicion of second-degree petit theft, battery on an officer, resisting an officer with violence, resisting an officer without violence, and obstruction.
He appeared in court on Wednesday, and his bail was set at $2,000.
He was in the Broward County Jail on Friday, and the public defender's office was assigned to represent him.
Broward County Public Defender Howard Finkelstein called the footage he saw "sadistic" and "beyond outrageous."
"It was throwback as to how mentally ill people have been dealt with for decades," Finkelstein said.
"There was no need to kick him or hurt him. He was obviously in crisis. This was a gratuitous infliction of pain."
Finkelstein said it's not clear whether the case against Narcisse-Beckford will go forward.
"It is our hope that the state will see the higher crime in here in prosecuting the officers," he said.
North Carolina trooper sidelined over Instagram post about police brutality
RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) — A North Carolina state trooper has been placed on administrative duty over an Instagram post that said police beatings are deserved.
State Highway Patrol Sgt. Michael Baker tells The News and Observer that the agency is investigating Sgt. Jonathan K. Whitley, who's been a trooper since 1996. The post by Instagram user "jkwhitley2608" says people beaten by police shouldn't "get on TV in hopes of getting your check. The police already gave you what you deserved."
The writer of the post also says he hates the public education system and "indoctrination centers known as college campuses." It says he would never vote for a Democrat and "can't wait" to vote for President Donald Trump again. It also says he didn't own a slave and doesn't owe anyone low-income housing assistance.
BOERUM HILL, Brooklyn (WABC) — Police are investigating video that has surfaced on Facebook showing a young mother being arrested and tackled to the ground with her young child at a benefits center in Brooklyn. Officials say on Friday, police responded to a 911 call for harassment inside 275 Bergen Street in Boerum Hill. NYPD officers say they tried to remove Jazmine Headley, 23, from the building after disorderly conduct and obstructing the hallway.
In the video, HRA peace officers can be seen restraining the woman on the floor, while she is holding her 1-year-old son. Officers are seen prying the boy out of Headley’s arms.
Officers then tried to place her under arrest.
Officials say Headley refused to comply with officers’ orders, and was taken into custody. She is being charged with resisting arrest and acting in a manner injurious to a child among other charges.
NYC Council Member Corey Johnson tweeted,
“This is unacceptable, appalling and heart breaking. I’d like to understand what transpired and how these officers or the NYPD justifies this. It’s hard to watch this video.”
Headley refused medical treatment for both herself and the son.
A family member took custody of the 1-year-old following the incident. ACS was notified.
None of the officers were injured.
‘Appalling’ Video Shows the Police Yanking 1-Year-Old From His Mother’s Arms
A video that shows police officers trying to remove a woman’s 1-year-old son from her grasp as they arrested her in a Brooklyn food stamp office ignited a fury on social media and prompted calls on Sunday for an explanation from the police.
A Facebook user who uploaded the video said the police had been called on Friday after the woman, identified by the police as Jazmine Headley, 23, sat on the floor of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program office in Boerum Hill because there were no available chairs.
After a verbal dispute with a security guard, someone called the police, according to Nyashia Ferguson, who posted the video.
It begins with Ms. Headley lying on the floor, cradling her son and yelling, “They’re hurting my son! They’re hurting my son!”
A female sergeant and three police officers, two of whom appear to be women, surround Ms. Headley and attempt to pull the child away. Then one officer, her back facing the camera, repeatedly yanks the child in an apparent attempt to separate him from his mother.
After more officers join the fray, the officer who yanked the child waves a yellow stun gun at the outraged crowd of onlookers, which includes several children and people filming with their cellphones.
The encounter was the latest in New York to spark outrage over excessive policing against unarmed civilians, despite the Police Department’s implementation of de-escalation training.
Nearly all of the civilians involved in those incidents have been black or Latino. The training followed the death of an unarmed black man, Eric Garner, from a police chokehold in 2014 on Staten Island.
The Patrol Guide, the official police manual, states that stun guns should be used in limited circumstances: against people who are physically resisting being taken into custody; people who indicate verbally that they intend to do so; and people who are acting in a manner that could cause injury to themselves or someone else.
The Police Department called Friday’s incident “troubling” in a statement on Sunday, and said officers had responded to a 911 call for harassment. When the officers arrived, security guards told them that Ms. Headley had refused to leave.
The police officers told Ms. Headley to leave “numerous times,” the police said, and after she refused, the security guards “brought the woman to the floor.” Police officers then tried to arrest her; despite her resistance, she was taken into custody, the police said.
Ms. Headley was charged with resisting arrest, acting in a manner injurious to a child, obstructing governmental administration and trespassing. The police said she refused medical treatment for herself and her son, who was placed in the care of a relative.
She could not be reached for comment on Sunday because she was being held without bail on Rikers Island, according to online corrections records and Brooklyn Defender Services, the public defender organization representing her.
Deputy Commissioner Phillip Walzak, a police spokesman, said the officers involved are all assigned to the 84th Precinct and remained on full-duty status. He declined to give their names or say whether they followed department protocols, citing its investigation.
The department is investigating the incident with the city Human Resources Administration, which administers public benefits. A spokeswoman for Allied Universal, the parent company of the security firm visible on security guards’ patches, FJC Security, did not respond to requests for comment.
“They’re always rude,” Ms. Ferguson said about the guards in an interview. “They think that people that are poor don’t have nothing, so you can treat them any kind of way.”
She disputed the police account of the incident and said the officer who waved the stun gun, not a security guard, had forced Ms. Headley to the ground.
The police “didn’t help at all,” she said. “They made it way worse.”
For the city’s poor, applying for public assistance requires copious amounts of patience, and Friday had been no different for Ms. Headley, Ms. Ferguson said.
Ms. Headley had been waiting for about two hours, sitting on the floor the entire time, in the part of the office that helps families get child care, Ms. Ferguson said. The office was more crowded than usual, she said, and the wait times were agonizing.
A female security guard eventually approached Ms. Headley, and several more guards followed as a verbal dispute escalated. Ms. Ferguson said they taunted Ms. Headley and laughed in her face before leaving.
Ten minutes later, they returned with the police, Ms. Ferguson said. A fearful expression crossed Ms. Headley’s face as they approached, she said.
The police officers asked Ms. Headley to come with them, Ms. Ferguson said. When she tried to explain, they cut her off. The situation quickly devolved into chaos.
“The baby was screaming for his life,” said Ms. Ferguson, who was there with her 7-month-old daughter. “The lady was begging for them to get off of her. I was scared.”
On social media, some people fumed over the police officers’ actions, and wondered what Ms. Headley could possibly have done to warrant their response.
“This is unacceptable, appalling and heart breaking,” Corey Johnson, the City Council speaker, wrote on Twitter. “I’d like to understand what transpired and how these officers or the NYPD justifies this. It’s hard to watch this video.”
Letitia James, the city’s public advocate, called in a statement for the officers to be placed on desk duty and the results of the investigation to be made public.
“Being poor is not a crime,” said Ms. James, who is also the state’s attorney general-elect. She added, “No mother should have to experience the trauma and humiliation we all witnessed in this video.”
Alex S. Vitale, a sociology professor at Brooklyn College who coordinates its Policing and Social Justice Project, said that rather than defusing tensions, the officers appear to be needlessly using force against someone who refused to comply with their requests. He said the officers deserved to be suspended.
“It’s just hard to imagine what possibly could have transpired before the video starts that would have warranted that level of force in those circumstances,” he said.
Professor Vitale added that he was baffled that no one in the food stamp office, which has security guards and social workers, could figure out how to handle the situation without calling the police.
A police officer who waved a stun gun at teenagers near Midwood High School in Brooklyn in March 2017 is facing disciplinary charges after Professor Vitale recorded the incident. “You want to ride the lightning?” the officer asked one of the teenagers, after pushing her with his baton.
In an era when New York City’s police commissioner has pushed for stronger ties between neighborhoods and the police who patrol them, Professor Vitale said incidents like these only harden mistrust of the police among poor people of color.
“This just reinforces their sense that police are a source of violence and injustice,” he said.
The police union defended the officers. “These police officers were put in an impossible situation,” said the Patrolmen’s Benevolent Association president, Pat Lynch.
“They didn’t create the dispute at the HRA office – as always, they were called in to deal with the inevitable fallout when the rest of our city government fails in its task,” he said. “Their objective was to enforce the law while protecting the safety of this mother, her child and every person in that office, some of whom were actively making a tense situation worse. The event would have unfolded much differently if those at the scene had simply complied with the officers’ lawful orders.”
Black people ‘grossly overrepresented,’ more likely to be hurt or killed by Toronto police, racial profiling report finds
How Phoenix Explains a Rise in Police Violence: It’s the Civilians’ Fault
'Hang on man, don't die,' witness heard injured St. Louis officer say after he shot man in stolen SUV
ST. LOUIS • A police officer was injured in an encounter with a man in a stolen SUV at a St. Louis gas station Wednesday afternoon and fatally shot the suspect in the vehicle, police said.
The injured suspect and officer were both rushed to Barnes-Jewish Hospital, where the suspect died, according to St. Louis Police Chief John Hayden. His name has not been released, but he was in his mid-20s, police said.
The officer who shot the suspect suffered a “very significant head injury” in the encounter, Hayden said. His condition wasn’t available, but his injuries were not life-threatening.
It began early Wednesday afternoon when two police officers began to investigate a maroon Hyundai Santa Fe at a BP gas station at 5003 Goodfellow Boulevard, Hayden said. A license plate reader alerted police to the SUV, which had been reported stolen two days earlier.
One of the officers, 31 and a two-year veteran of the force, got out of the patrol car and approached the driver’s side of the SUV at the gas station, Hayden said.
The order of what happened next wasn’t immediately clear, Hayden said, but during the encounter, the SUV accelerated backward and crashed near the pumps. The officer was caught by the open driver’s side door of the SUV and was injured in the head. The officer opened fire, striking the man in the SUV at least once in the chest, Hayden said.
The other officer did not fire his weapon and was not hurt, Hayden said.
Hayden could not provide a more detailed order of events or answer questions about why the officer had shot the suspect. He said he did not know if the dead man had a weapon.
“That’s all part of the investigation,” he said. “We’re unsure right now how the whole thing transpired.”
‘Hang on man, don’t die’
The gas station is just north of Interstate 70 in the Walnut Park West neighborhood.
Ralston Jannice, 49, works at a nearby tire shop and was at the gas station when the police pulled up, he said.
He watched as an officer approached the SUV, telling the man inside not to move.
“The guy moved,” Jannice said. He was moving inside the vehicle and at the same time it began moving backward until it crashed. Jannice didn’t see the officer caught by the door or injured.
He heard gunshots after the crash. Jannice believes he heard four, though another witness thought he’d heard two. They were among people on the parking lot who dove for cover, afraid they’d be hit.
Then he heard the injured officer, a gash on his head, yelling.
“Hang on man, don’t die, don’t die,” the officer was yelling, Jannice said. Then he shouted for an ambulance.
A video posted to social media appears to show the aftermath of the shooting. Two officers, one with blood coming from an apparent head wound, are seen kneeling and bending over a man on the ground near a maroon SUV. They appear to be putting bandages on his chest.
Jannice tried to come to terms with what he’d witnessed.
“He shouldn’t have moved, man,” Jannice said. “The dude shouldn’t have moved. … And then I’m thinking the police shouldn’t have touched the car, especially if you know it’s just a stolen car.”
Hayden said there was video from the scene that police would be reviewing to determine what happened. He said the video would be released to the public after the investigation was complete.
Reporters gathered outside Barnes-Jewish Hospital Wednesday afternoon to hear from Hayden. As they waited, a visibly upset woman arrived at the emergency room.
“The police shot my (expletive) baby!” she yelled. She left without speaking to reporters.
A large police presence on Wednesday afternoon had the gas station at Goodfellow and Lillian Avenue surrounded with crime scene tape. They photographed a damaged maroon SUV that was up against a gas pump. They went in and out of the gas station building, and examined evidence including blood on the ground near the gas pumps. They also picked up what appeared to be a medical kit.
Suspect killed in St. Louis officer-involved shooting is identified
ST. LOUIS (KMOV.com) --- An officer who was injured exchanging shots with a suspect was released from the hospital Friday and is recovering at home.
The officer was injured and a suspect was shot and killed during an officer-involved shooting in north St. Louis.
According to the St. Louis Police Department, the officer-involved shooting occurred at Goodfellow and Lillian shortly before 1 p.m. Wednesday.
An all points bulletin went out from the Real Time Crime center that a vehicle reported stolen two days ago had been spotted near the intersection, and two officers on patrol responded.
The driver of the car, identified Thursday as 29-year-old Demario Bass, pulled into a BP gas station, and the officer in the passenger seat got out to speak with him.
According to police, the 31-year-old officer was standing between Bass and the open driver's side door when the suspect put the car in reverse and hit the gas.
The officer was reportedly pinned between the door and the car. Bass eventually crashed, and the officer was reportedly thrown into the vehicle and onto the ground. During the incident, the officer fired his weapon and hit the man in his chest.
Bass, who was in his 20s, was pronounced dead at a St. Louis hospital shortly after.
Police said officers found drugs inside the car but a gun was not located.
The officer, a two-year veteran of the force, sustained a cut to his head and "oral trauma," according to St. Louis Police Chief Hayden. Police tell News 4 the injury is not life threatening.
It is unclear when the officer fired his gun during the incident or how many times he fired. Police are still investigating the vehicle and have gathered video from nearby surveillance cameras.
No punishment for officers in Jazmine Headley arrest
An NYPD Internal Affairs Bureau review of the arrest of Jazmine Headley in Brooklyn last week found no wrongdoing on the part of NYPD officers involved or action that would result in discipline or change of status.
"The NYPD has conducted a strenuous review of what happened, because the public deserves answers, and we must take every opportunity to continuously strengthen how the NYPD serves the people of New York City," Police Commissioner James O'Neill said in a statement. "This review shows that prior to the incident depicted on public video, NYPD officers are working with the client to de-escalate the situation."
Uniformed NYPD officers can be seen in the footage trying to wrench Headley’s 1-year-old son from her arms, at one point lifting the pair off the floor of a city benefits office. An NYPD officer produces a stun gun and waves it indiscriminately in the faces of onlookers.
Mayor Bill de Blasio has faced harsh criticism for waiting three days to comment on the incident and for refusing to publicly question the NYPD's actions.
The review was based on publicly available video, body camera footage, 911 calls and interviews with Jazmine Headley and her mother, the department said.
The review yielded three recommendations for policy changes going forward: establishing guidelines for interactions between NYPD and HRA officers, summoning an NYPD supervisor when police respond to calls at HRA facilities and reviewing tactics and training programs for situations in which police officers encounter someone holding a young child.