Playmaker88
My style is impetuous.. My defense is impregnable
Nah he wasnt..
Sonny Liston could have knocked out Ali with 1 punch but he couldn't catch him. Joe Frazier should have knocked Ali out with one punch but his chin and most importantly his will was too strong and he didnt. George Foreman most certainly could have knocked him out with 1 punch but Ali outsmarted him. Even when Ali was old and washed up Larry Holmes still couldn't drop him with 1 punch and he was nothing more than a human punching bag in that fight.You guys are all making good points.
But lets go back to 1986/87 when Tyson was being trained by Cus D'Mato (sp?). Thats when Tyson was knocking people out with one punch. Some of his fights didn't last 1 minute. I remember circa 1985/86 they televised the Tyson/Marvis Frazier fight (Joe Fraizer's son) . The prefight was about an hour. The commentators talked about each fighter's style and they played clips from each other's past fights. If I recall the fight came on a Saturday afternoon on regular TV, meaning you didn't need cable.
Anyway, Tyson knocked him out in 31 seconds.
My point is, as great as Ali was, a 20 year old Tyson could have knocked out Ali with one punch.
Granted, a 30 year old Tyson couldn't beat Ali.
Lol at comparing the level of competition. Lol at comparing beating Spinks to losing to Frazier. Joe Frazier is one of the best to ever lace them up. Michael Spinks wasnt shit. Tyson did deteriorate after the Spinks fight but Ali got better after the Frazier fight. You just proved my point.Fact is Tyson deteriorated as a fighter after the Spinks fight.
The Tyson that beat Spinks 100% beats the Ali that lost to fraiser....
And I'm fairly certain any other version of Ali as well
Lol at comparing the level of competition. Lol at comparing beating Spinks to losing to Frazier. Joe Frazier is one of the best to ever lace them up. Michael Spinks wasnt shit. Tyson did deteriorate after the Spinks fight but Ali got better after the Frazier fight. You just proved my point.
Ali-Frazier was literally the fight of the century. Two undefeated champions who were both all time greats and still in their 20s. Ali came up during the greatest era of heavyweights and he dominated. The level of competition that he faced and beat only made him better. The lack of quality competition that Tyson faced helped to make him worse. Losing to Frazier and Norton made Ali a better fighter. Beating Spinks and Williams made Tyson a worse fighter. Losing to two great fighters got Ali ready for Foreman. Beating a series of bums set Tyson up for Buster Douglas. You cant be series with this bullshit smmfh.
What in the fuck does Tyson being managed by Jews have to do with Ali facing and beating better competition during a stronger era and for a longer time? Wtf are you talking about??????I hear what you're saying, but you gotta remember that Tyson's camp changed around the time he won the title. He was being trained by Cus D'Amato. D'Amato died a little over a year before Tyson became the youngest world heavyweight titleholder in history at the age of 20 years four months. Cus D'Amato died in November of 1985. After Cus D'Mato died Kevin Roony took over, then Don King and Jim Jacobs (a jew) took over and promised Tyson fame and fortune because "Black people need to stick together". Tyson fell for Don King's bullshit and one by one the people in his camp changed to the point where he was being managed and trained by jews like Jim Jacobs that knew nothing about boxing.
The Mike Tyson that was trained by Cus D'Mato or Kevin Rooney isn't the same Mike Tyson that was managed by Don King and Jim Jacobs who fought Buster Douglass.
What in the fuck does Tyson being managed by Jews have to do with Ali facing and beating better competition during a stronger era and for a longer time? Wtf are you talking about??????
So you hate Jewish people. I dont fucking care. Since you decided to go on some anti Jewish hate tirade instead of answering my original question I'll ask it again. What in the fuck does Tyson being managed by Jews have to do with Ali facing and beating better competition during a stronger era and for a longer time?If you don't know by now, I'll tell you; jewish people are sleazy and rip people off. It's their nature.
They follow The Talmud which should be in your local library. You should read it.
So you hate Jewish people. I dont fucking care. Since you decided to go on some anti Jewish hate tirade instead of answering my original question I'll ask it again. What in the fuck does Tyson being managed by Jews have to do with Ali facing and beating better competition during a stronger era and for a longer time?
1. The jews that managed Tyson were more concerned with his money than his state of mind or well being. I think Cus D'Amato really cared about Mike Tyson the person, not just the boxer. I think Don King and Jim Jacobs just saw dollar signs when they looked at Mike Tyson.
2. Tyson being managed by jews has absolutely nothing to do, "with Ali facing and beating better competition during a stronger era and for a longer time." But you'd have to admit that his managers and trainers had a lot to do with Tyson falling off. And let's not make it like Tyson fought nobodies. Michael Spinks, Razor Ruddock, Bonecrusher Smith were all contenders. He just knocked them out so it made them look like weaker fighters.
Having said all that, It seems like Ali fought tougher opponents. But Tyson was a beast when he was being trained by Cus D'Amato and/or Kevin Rooney.
Tyson lost to a journeymen in his prime. Never beat a fighter that any boxing fan would even consider great in their prime or his. Tyson is the 3rd best HW of his own era
Here goes the tyson excuses. I know u love the nostalgia. Fighters loss their trainers all the time. That his fault he couldn't stay focused . Tyson didnt beat a great fighter in their prime. Larry holmes is his best win. The term flabby and sick came from a 38 year old holmes . Hell a 200 year old George foreman gave holyfield a better fight than tyson did. Stop with the nostalgia and look at the resume. And stop making excuses for him. He didnt reach his full potential. . Lewis and Holyfield are both higher on the all time great HW list than tyson. Oh yea anf they are both older and both washed Mike.Mike was not in his prime when he lost to Douglas. Stop it. He didn't have a real team behind him. He didn't train well. He didn't even take the fight seriously. Douglas fought the fight of his life, so he deserves credit for winning, but it's a flat out lie to say that Tyson was at his best when he fought Douglas.
And people need to cut the "Tyson didn't fight anyone" shit out. So the fuck what. He destroyed most of the people he did fought regardless of their ability, and if you actually watched the fights, you can't question his abilities. What other heavyweight had his combination of speed, footwork, head movement, power, and boxing IQ? Name one. Ali was great, but even he didn't exhibit everything that Tyson did.
Here goes the tyson excuses. I know u love the nostalgia. Fighters loss their trainers all the time. That his fault he couldn't stay focused . Tyson didnt beat a great fighter in their prime. Larry holmes is his best win. The term flabby and sick came from a 38 year old holmes . Hell a 200 year old George foreman gave holyfield a better fight than tyson did. Stop with the nostalgia and look at the resume. And stop making excuses for him. He didnt reach his full potential. . Lewis and Holyfield are both higher on the all time great HW list than tyson. Oh yea anf they are both older and both washed Mike.