Fine. Let's pivot to abortion since you two can't debate the subject at hand.
Question 1. If a woman decides to have an abortion and goes to a doctor to perform the procedure, who really has final control over the decision, the woman or the doctor?
Question 2. If a woman wants to end the pregnancy and she lives in a state where it is illegal to do so and no doctor is willing to perform the procedure, is the decision still hers?
I'm about to shoe you just how irrelevant the subject of abortion is to the point @Ale Sharpton is making.
The subject was a woman's ability to control whether or not she's pregnant. Not the actual act of getting pregnant but simply remaining pregnant. So that's why abortion is an easy counter for that.
But even going off your example a doctor can't refuse to perform an abortion so long as it's legal in that state so that 1st scenario is pointless to even consider.
For the 2nd one that woman will most likely do what women did before abortion became legal and simply go to a state where it is legal or unfortunately find a less safe way to terminate the pregnancy. So yeah no matter how you put it the ability and final decision to carry a life to full term still lies within the person that fetus/whatever you wanna call it is growing inside.
All your questions and scenarios sound exactly like the shit people who want these archaic ass abortion laws to be implemented make. That's not a good thing.