AZTG
OG
Killing though is natural. Man always has and always will kill each other.
But there has been a progressive drop in morality. Socially as a whole people care less and less about doing what is right. Things like love, honor, goodness, and kindness are less and less encouraged. And almost ridiculed.
People don't strive to be a good person as much. It's much more open to serving yourself and immediate gratification. Ends justifying the means is much more prevalent.
Even in religious wars... People committed horrendous acts under the belief they would be rewarded in an afterlife. It was an honor to die in battle. They went in there under the belief that they were doing a good thing. And their society saw them as good people. Those who were lucky enough to survive again were often honored and considered good people when war was over. Even as recent as American history, we still have standing monuments of war heroes and these are considered because they were "good" people....
My argument is that the entire concept of "good" is making it's exit as people are no longer concerned with those things.
Like in today's age.... Who would you consider a good person?.. It's really tough to answer that question. Where as in many points in society we (as in humans) always has some sort of an idea of what we considered a good person.
And I think there's a significant correlation between that and the belief that one will enter heaven or hell in the afterlife.
Like man is going to kill. That's an absolute.
But killing under the belief that your soul will be rewarded for dying on the battlefield...has always been considered much more honorable and moral than killing for money.... At least in my opinion
I personally dont believe religion is necessary for people being good.
Again, historically morality was being taught before the Abhrahamic religions.
Christian Morality wasnt even a thing until around the 1300 when Thomas Aquinas established it. And even then, Christian Morality and Islamic Morality is based on the philosophy of Aristotle, who lived before either religion was a thing.
The concept of hell didnt even come into existence until Christian missionaries went to Scandanavia and got introduced to Hel.
I say all that to say, what we call good and evil was established in Greece and Persia, both before Abrahamic religions.
And today, we still follow those basis. And these are the current definitions of good and evil. They all have their roots in Greek philosophy, mostly Aristotle.
What we call good and evil didnt start with abrahamic religions. So to say people need religion to be good is historically false.
There are good people. And there are bad people. There are more good people in the world than good people. The issue is that a bad action has more impact than a good action, so it feels like there are more bad people.
I can see why you feel how you do, but historical precedence says thats not true.