Welcome To aBlackWeb

Register

JONATHAN MAJORS FOUND GUILTY IN NYC FOR ASSAULTING WOMAN

Inori said:
him pushing her back in the car was likely what did it.

Keep your hands to yourself.. EVERYBODY
Click to expand...
And this absolves the chick from being the aggressor and him trying to get away.

It’s like action and reaction doesn’t even matter.

Even her continue to chase him….wasn’t that being aggressive?
 
Valentinez A. Kaiser said:
Juror wants to know the charges in full explanation, why is important for obvious reasons. I had a look and I believe that he's being charged on 4 misdemeanor counts:

  1. assault in the third degree with intent to cause physical injury,
  2. assault in the third degree recklessly causing physical injury,
  3. aggravated harassment in the second degree,
  4. harassment in the second degree.
#1

P.L. 120.00 says that a person is guilty of assault in the third degree when:

  1. With intent to cause physical injury to another person, he causes such injury to such person or to a third person; or
  2. He recklessly causes physical injury to another person; or
  3. With criminal negligence, he causes physical injury to another person by means of a deadly weapon or a dangerous instrument
(I see this as same Penal chapter as count #1)

SECTION 120.00
Assault in the third degree
Penal (PEN) CHAPTER 40, PART 3, TITLE H, ARTICLE 120

§ 120.00 Assault in the third degree.

A person is guilty of assault in the third degree when:

1. With intent to cause physical injury to another person, he causes
such injury to such person or to a third person; or

2. He recklessly causes physical injury to another person; or

3. With criminal negligence, he causes physical injury to another
person by means of a deadly weapon or a dangerous instrument.

Assault in the third degree is a class A misdemeanor.

SECTION 240.30
Aggravated harassment in the second degree
Penal (PEN) CHAPTER 40, PART 3, TITLE N, ARTICLE 240

§ 240.30 Aggravated harassment in the second degree.

A person is guilty of aggravated harassment in the second degree when:

1. With intent to harass another person, the actor either:

(a) communicates, anonymously or otherwise, by telephone, by computer
or any other electronic means, or by mail, or by transmitting or
delivering any other form of communication, a threat to cause physical
harm to, or unlawful harm to the property of, such person, or a member
of such person's same family or household as defined in subdivision one
of section 530.11 of the criminal procedure law, and the actor knows or
reasonably should know that such communication will cause such person to
reasonably fear harm to such person's physical safety or property, or to
the physical safety or property of a member of such person's same family
or household; or

(b) causes a communication to be initiated anonymously or otherwise,
by telephone, by computer or any other electronic means, or by mail, or
by transmitting or delivering any other form of communication, a threat
to cause physical harm to, or unlawful harm to the property of, such
person, a member of such person's same family or household as defined in
subdivision one of section 530.11 of the criminal procedure law, and the
actor knows or reasonably should know that such communication will cause
such person to reasonably fear harm to such person's physical safety or
property, or to the physical safety or property of a member of such
person's same family or household; or

2. With intent to harass or threaten another person, he or she makes a
telephone call, whether or not a conversation ensues, with no purpose of
legitimate communication; or

3. With the intent to harass, annoy, threaten or alarm another person,
he or she strikes, shoves, kicks, or otherwise subjects another person
to physical contact, or attempts or threatens to do the same because of
a belief or perception regarding such person's race, color, national
origin, ancestry, gender, gender identity or expression, religion,
religious practice, age, disability or sexual orientation, regardless of
whether the belief or perception is correct; or

4. With the intent to harass, annoy, threaten or alarm another person,
he or she strikes, shoves, kicks or otherwise subjects another person to
physical contact thereby causing physical injury to such person or to a
family or household member of such person as defined in section 530.11
of the criminal procedure law; or

5. He or she commits the crime of harassment in the first degree and
has previously been convicted of the crime of harassment in the first
degree as defined by section 240.25 of this article within the preceding
ten years.

Aggravated harassment in the second degree is a class A misdemeanor.

SECTION 240.26
Harassment in the second degree
Penal (PEN) CHAPTER 40, PART 3, TITLE N, ARTICLE 240

§ 240.26 Harassment in the second degree.

A person is guilty of harassment in the second degree when, with
intent to harass, annoy or alarm another person:

1. He or she strikes, shoves, kicks or otherwise subjects such other
person to physical contact, or attempts or threatens to do the same; or

2. He or she follows a person in or about a public place or places; or

3. He or she engages in a course of conduct or repeatedly commits acts
which alarm or seriously annoy such other person and which serve no
legitimate purpose.

Subdivisions two and three of this section shall not apply to
activities regulated by the national labor relations act, as amended,
the railway labor act, as amended, or the federal employment labor
management act, as amended.

Harassment in the second degree is a violation.
Click to expand...

I posted the definition of the counts on page 56

Inori said:
him pushing her back in the car was likely what did it.

Keep your hands to yourself.. EVERYBODY
Click to expand...

Agreed that's what got him the harassment guilty verdict...

A person is guilty of harassment in the second degree when, with
intent to harass, annoy or alarm another person:

1. He or she strikes, shoves, kicks or otherwise subjects such other
person to physical contact, or attempts or threatens to do the same; or

2. He or she follows a person in or about a public place or places; or

3. He or she engages in a course of conduct or repeatedly commits acts
which alarm or seriously annoy such other person and which serve no
legitimate purpose.

such a weak charge hence the misdemeanor!

On the flip side, she was also harassing him by chasing him for 5 blocks (but she's not on trial remember!)
 
DOS_patos said:
And this absolves the chick from being the aggressor and him trying to get away.

It’s like action and reaction doesn’t even matter.

Even her continue to chase him….wasn’t that being aggressive?
Click to expand...
Now you do have a point , they both per law harassed each other


Screenshot_20231218_201053_Chrome.jpg
 
IMG_2433.jpeg
I can appreciate Marvel giving the brother the benefit of the doubt. I mean, they invested heavily into him and that role, but they didn’t HAVE to.

Marvel hurting - lost the great King Chadwick Boseman who was supposed to be the focus of the franchise going forward. Now they lose the big bad of the franchise. #ripchadwickboseman
 
Don't think it's a career killer but he def fumbled that Disney bag and its gone gone gone

Positive is it opens up his schedule for more thespian roles in the future. Can be the next black John Malkovich or something
 
Too_Chi said:
Don't think it's a career killer but he def fumbled that Disney bag and its gone gone gone

Positive is it opens up his schedule for more thespian roles in the future. Can be the next black John Malkovich or something
Click to expand...
Why he gotta be a black anything?

How about he being the next johnathan majors.

Fuck then cacs

Plenty of black thespians.

I’m mad at errbody today
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top