how much did the store lose?

[mryounggun]

$100

 

[Race Jones]

$200

 

[Inori]

$200

explain

 

[Rubato]

They lost $100…if you’re asking for the net loss/profit that’s not possible to answer without having other info on what the store paid for the product in the first place

 

[Justauser]

As a retailer, they should factor in loss and theft. Only $100? They aint lose shit to me.

 

[PhenomTheMac]

They lost 30 from the drawer and 70 from the store. 100 dollars.

 

[King Freeman]

$200

How you get the answer to your own question wrong.

 

[King Freeman]

explain

She got tf out of dogde. The concern for the correct answer wasn't as important as her need to feel correct.

The thread ceased to matter once our answers failed to match the one she was decided on before she started the thread.

Race toxic AF

 

[Mister B. M. Ed.]

$170.

He made off with $70 of groceries and only left other $30 out of $100.

I can see where the $200 came from from, but some of that went back to pay for inventory.

 

[4thaLove]

They lost $100. -$100 - $70(groceries) = -$170 + $100(he paid) = -$70 - $30(change) = -$100

 

[King Freeman]

$170.

He made off with $70 of groceries and only left other $30 out of $100.

I can see where the $200 came from from, but some of that went back to pay for inventory.

This is wrong also. The $100 he took was money from items already paid for so if he's using that same $100 to purchase more it's going back in the till so it's a wash. He took $70 worth of product and then got $30 change so the store lost $100.

 

[Donnerswag]

Let's say the store has $500 in the register, then they lost $100, so now they have $400. Then they lost $70 worth of product ($330) but got back the initial $100 ($430). After that they lost another $30 as change ($400). So they lost $100. I think... Or it could be $30 because he pretty much traded the stolen $100 for $30 and $70 worth of goods. So if we're talking strictly in a monetary sense they only lost $30.

 

[Supahn]

$200

yes, the store "sells" the items to the thief but the store doesn't know that the $100 used is its own $100. So the store

1. Had $100 taken from them
2. Sold $70 dollars worth of items bought with the stolen $100
3. Gave $30 in change to the thief

To the store, it looks like it made a $70 sale when it actually made a $70 loss. The thief knows that they came out with free items that they needed and $30 in change that they never had in the first place.

 

[Mister]

This simple problem is whoopin some of yall asses

 

[Duwop]

This why Ricky was about to get into college

 

[DMorgan]

even if they got part of it back?

lol

The store can't get part of it back if the money paid for the items was stolen from them store in the first place.

 

[King Freeman]

The store can't get part of it back if the money paid for the items was stolen from them store in the first place.

You have to look at it like he stole $70 worth of items and got $30 change. The $100 he took out the register never actually went anywhere.

 

[DMorgan]

You have to look at it like he stole $70 worth of items and got $30 change. The $100 he took out the register never actually went anywhere.

If I steal $100 from you and buy $70 worth of whatever from you.

You are out of that $100 plus just actually gave away $70 worth of items cause that money I gave you is actually your money.

 

[mike030270]

Hint: the answer is online

Lol

 

[Duwop]

Hint: the answer is online

Lol

so are we