ExactlyB....$100
he stole the 100 but in thoery gave it back and got $70 worth of free shit adn the change
Best way to put it.B....$100
he stole the 100 but in thoery gave it back and got $70 worth of free shit adn the change
I literally LOL for a good min and then you posted the wrong answerWe got a lot of GED niggas on ABW lol
This aint even that tough of an equation to be this confused.
He lost $100
The nigga traded $70 for $70 worth of goods. The thief still has $70 worth of goodz and the $30 remaining.
The owner is now down $70 worth of goodz that came out his own pocket and the extra $30 the nigga stole. That's 100. Then the owner gave an extra $30. Yall niggas slow as shit man lol
Answer - 130
Yeah except the owner didn’t pay 70 for the goods the customer paid 70 for so (BUZZARD) you’re all wrong. Jslol yo that "bill" part was gay af
I'm a man of my word, I'll send u the bread
B....$100
he stole the 100 but in thoery gave it back and got $70 worth of free shit adn the change
1. $100 in register means it was used to purchase something that was at least $100.
2. Stealing $100 from the register takes away $100 from the purchase, those items aren’t there either.
3. Spending $70 isn’t “giving it back”, that money now covers those items. Gets back $30.
4. Store loses the original $100 purchase to a thief who stole $70 in items, plus $30 in cash.
Totals $200 in losses. Right??
Eloquently put....and the answer still $100The best answer from the choices is the owner lost $100. The $100 bill that was stolen was then given back to the owner. What the owner loses is the $70 worth of goods and the $30 in change, which makes for a total of $70 + $30 = $100. The owner has lost $100.
Technically, the owner lost $30 plus the value, V, of the $70 of goods. Since stores typically sell goods at a markup, the value may be less than $70. But in the case of a loss leader, the owner may have lost more than $70.
Another strategy to solve the problem is to break it down into two stores.
Story A
A guy walks into a store and steals a $100 bill from the register without the owner’s knowledge.
How much money did the owner lose? Clearly the answer is $100. The owner is a net -100.
Story B
He buys $70 worth of goods using a $100 bill and the owner gives $30 in change.
How much money did the owner lose? The owner did not lose any money, this is a routine transaction! If the goods are valued at V, the owner is a net +100 – V – 30 = 70 – V.
The story in the riddle is the sum of the two stories. This means the owner’s position is the sum of the position in those two stories. The owner is a net -100 + (70 – V) = -30 – V. That is, the owner lost $30 plus the value of the goods. If the goods are valued at $70, then the owner lost $100.
this my nigga trillfate?Eloquently put....and the answer still $100