He stole 100
He traded in $70 for $70 worth of goods.
Here's where I make it make sense. He didn't trade 70 for 70. He traded 100 for 70.... that 30 is a remainder, not additional
Watching y'all do remedial math if something else though lol
THANK U!!!!Because he paid for it with the $100 bill.
So erase the first part of the story right. The store owner essentially gave him, $70 of goods for free, and another $30 for his pocket. The original $100 stolen is now back in the cash register.
200
100 was stolen
70 was an additional loss
30 was an additional loss
It’s neither option.
He stole 100 but then purchased 70 of what a customer would pay and got 30 back as change.
Ok so the owner of said store isn’t paying 70 as the customer does he gets it at whole sale price so he actually lost less than 100...
OK so since you know the mark up price, what's the final answer.